
Hello everyone,
and welcome to another part of our YourDailyGerman Grammar Course. The course with the most freedom because YOU decide what you learn.
And today,you’ve decided to learn about something we do every single day.
No, not breathing, not eating, not checking our phone.
Today, we’ll learn:
How to make Comparisons in German
Usually, making comparisons is one of the more simple grammar topics in language learning.
In German however it is… well…
Nah, kidding. Just wanted to scare you a little.
German comparisons are pretty simple overall. Sure, there are some speed bumps like weird forms and sentence structure but nothing too bad.
This whole thing is going to be a two part episode.
Today in part one, we’ll learn all about regular comparisons and we’ll see what the more-form is and how to build it.
In part 2, we’ll look at the most-form and we’ll find out what the difference is between am besten and das Beste.
So if you’re ready, let’s jump right in.
***
And I’ll actually start with one of my favorite things: background.
Really love background. I think I’ll marry background some day. I’ll introduce background to my parents
“Hey mom, this is background. Background, this is my mom”
And they’ll get along so well and Background and I will have little middle ground childr
“Emanuel… can you please stop this and start the lesson?”
Oh… I’m sorry… of course. Here we go.
The Two Types of Comparison
Suppose we want to compare two items, A and B.
Whenever we want to compare two thing, no matter what language we’re in, there are essentially two ways to do that. Or we could say, there are two points of view we can take.
One is talking about “equality ” and one is talking about “difference”.
Take this example:
- A is as big as B.
This is the “equality”-angle. We’re looking at the items and say whether they are equal or not.
And now take this example:
- A is bigger than B.
This is the “difference”-angle and we basically look at one item and check if it is “more” than the other.
Generally, we tend to go for the equality-angle if the items are indeed equal, and for the difference-angle if they’re not, because that’s the most precise, but technically, both approached can express equality or difference.
- A is not as big as B.
Here, we’re saying that they’re not equal, but it’s a bit unclear which one is bigger.
- A is not bigger than B
Here, we’re saying that A is not “more” than B, but we don’t know if it’s equal or “less”.
Anyway, so these are the two types of comparison.
They have a different focus and, as we can see in the examples, quite a different grammar.
And there is another difference, because both ways are not limited to simple yes or no. We can kind of “grade” them and the words for that are different, too.
- A is [(by far) not – almost – about – just – exactly] as big as B.
- A is [not – almost – a little – considerably – much – a lot – infinitely ] bigger than B.
Do all languages work like that?
Well, not sure to be honest. But most languages do and German definitely does.
So when we want to learn how to form comparisons, there are two separate patterns we need to learn.
Let’s start with the angle of equality.
Comparisons – Equality
The English construction for this type of comparison is
- as … as
Many learners translate this with als, but that’s actually wrong.
The German counterpart for as… as is:
- so … wie
No als. It’s a common mistae
And it makes sense in a way. Imagine you tell someone about a huge fish you caught. In English you’d say
- It was that/(so) big.
and spread your arms. In a way this is also a comparison… only that one side is not put into words. Now, in German what you would say is this:
- Er war so groß.
Not “das groß”. So is the prime answer to wie (how)?
- Wie groß? So groß. (for more on so check here)
- How big? That big.
And that’s why using so for these comparisons isn’t all that weird after all. And what about wie? Well, a few centuries back people would still use instead the second as but als is super busy. It’s used for past and for the difference approach and I guess that started to be confusing. And wie and so make a great team anyway. And that’s why in German it is:
- so … wie.
Examples…
- Thomas ist so groß wie John.
- Thomas is so tall like John (lit.)
- Thomas is as tall as John.
- Ich habe gestern nicht so viel geschafft, wie ich mir vorgenommen hatte.
- I didn’t do as much as I had planned yesterday
or with a negative
- Mit Fahrrad bin ich nicht so schnell wie mit Bus.
- By bike I’m not so fast like with bus. (lit.)
- By bike I’m not as fast as by bus.
Now, we were talking background we learned that we can “grade” comparisons. So we can throw little words in there to make it more or less or simply… not. So let’s look at those and collect some vocabulary :)
- Ich bin beim Schach [bei weitem ] nicht [annähernd ] so gut wie du.
- I am [by far] not [nearly] as good as you at chess.
- Ich esse Pizza [fast / beinahe / annähernd / quasi ] so gerne wie Nudeln.
- I like eating pizza [almost /nearly] as much as I like eating pasta.
- In Berlin kostet ein Bier [ungefähr / in etwa / zirka ] so viel wie in Hamburg.
- A beer in Berlin costs [about] as much as in Hamburg.
Now, there is actually one important word missing in that list and that word is genau. You may know it as the German version of exactly.
- “Deutsch hat also 4 Fälle?”
“Genau.” - “So, German has 4 cases?”
“Exactly.”
Germans love to say genau… genau, genau, genau. Achso, stimmt and genau and you’re set for any conversation pretty much. People would say
- genau so … wie
all the time. So much so, that it finally lost its meaning.
- Ich esse genauso viel wie du.
- I eat as much as you.
The German sentence doesn’t have much focus on EXACTLY, that’s why I would translate it as just a normal comparison. It doesn’t “feel” exactly to me. And that’s probably also the reason why it is officially written as one word… so we can distinguish it from the case when we actually want to express exactly. Although, even then people might use an extra exact.
- Ich esse exakt genauso viel wie du. (up to the calory)
- I eat exactly as much as you.
And then, since we’re at it… here’s a different inflection of the same sentence with a slightly different meaning.
- Ich esse exakt genau SO viel wie du.
- I eat just as much as you (and not a crumb more – implies a certain reluctance).
Anyway.. generally I’d say for very short comparisons that involve just one verb people tend to use genauso instead of so just for flow. As soon as the phrase gets a little more complicated so will do and the genau starts to sound more and more exact. And you shouldn’t worry about that too much anyway… I just wanted to mention it so you don’t get confused by all the genauso-s you hear.
Now, a few things before we move on to the difference-comparison.
Not all comparisons are complete. In English, it’s simple because either part is introduced by as. In German, there are two different words so you need to think which part you’re talking about… the characteristic or the thing you compare with.
- It is not as bad. (for example: as expected )
- Es ist nicht so schlimm.
- (Contrived example: I’ll do it as good) As you wish.
- Wie du wünschst.
And then, there is a very handy phrasing you should know…
- so gut wie
Literally, this means (as) good as but in German it is used much more … always in a sense of practically or almost… even as a stand alone.
- Der Winter ist so gut wie vorbei.
- The winter is practically over.
- “Bist du mit deiner Hausarbeit fertig?”
“So gut wie.“ - “Are you done with your homework.”
“Almost.”
All right. We’ll come back to that later when we talk about sentence structure but first, let’s take a look at the second way of comparisons.
Comparing – Looking at Differences (“than”)
The structure for these comparisons is very similar in German and in English.
- A is newer than B.
Obviously we need 2 things… the word than and a special form of the adjective. The German word for than is … als. So in German we literally say
- “A is newer as B.”
That feels wrong of course but not so in German. In German als “feels” unequal. Just like than “feels”unequal in English. That’s why als doesn’t work for the other comparison any more.
- A ist so groß als B. … (wrong)
That is confusing because the als makes me feel that B is everything… but not equal to A. But you’ll get the hang of it pretty quickly. Than is als. Now what about the special form. The correct grammar jargon term for it is comparatively
unknown so let’s just call it the more-form. English has two ways to do it.
- nice … this is the normal form
- nicer… this is the more-form
- interesting … normal form
- more interesting… more-form
The first way is how it was done by the old Germanic tribes… just add -er… and possibly mess around with the vowel a bit, as we’ll see later. The more-way is how they do it in French and Italian. More nice, more fast, more interesting. And I guess the Brits, who kept importing old Latin terms, just figured they’d just use the same grammar as the Romance languages… at least for the “new”words. Now, German did import all those words too. But German has ZERO shame when it comes to “fitting in” foreign words…
- Die neuen, freshen Shows.
- Der Film hat mich gebrainwashed…
That is no joke. People do that every day. If you don’t believe me, just check out the other 22.000 hits Google has for that.
It it was just the same back then. Germans were just like “Oh optimal is an adjective?! Great.”
“Zwei Bier sind optimaler als ein Bier.”
“Sehr schön gesagt! Prost!”
The French who were also in that bar shuddered and tried to object…
“Well, first of all ‘optimaler’ isn’t a word. It should be ‘mehr optimal’.
And secondly optimal is already the maximum so there is no mor…”
But in vain. Nobody was listening. And there we are today… to build the more-form of an adjective you have to add -er, no matter how Latin, no matter how long, no matter how compound
- schön-er (prettier, more beautiful)
- interessant-er (more interesting)
- introvertiert-er (more introvert)
- herausragend-er (more distinguishable)
- vernachlässigbar-er (more neglectable)
And no matter whether adjective or adverb
- schnell-er – quicker AND more quickly
Now, of god damn course there are exceptions to this. The very basic ones behave totally differently.. but that’s the same for English.
- gut -besser
- good -better
- viel – mehr
- much/many – more
German has many more. But they’re not all that bad. Actually, let’s not call them exceptions. Let’s call them “rule with a bonus”. And what other could the bonus be than German’s truly… the umlaut
- groß – größer (tall/big)
- lang – länger (long
- warm- wärmer (warm)
- klug – klüger (smart)
- hoch – höher (high)… okay, here also the c drops out but whatever
I think there is no way of telling when the umlaut hits.
- wach – wacher (awake)
- schwach – schwächer (weak)
In courses and text books hey make you learn many of those early on and they do pay attention in tests and exams… a little too much for my taste actually. Sure, the forms are important and if you say “hocher” you sound incredibly clumsy but you will be understood. So unless you need it for a test I’d say the best is to just pick it up over time. Speaking of time… time for some examples… what was than again?… uh yeah… als
- Heute ist es kälter als gestern.
- Today it’s colder than yesterday.
- Ich hab’ heute mehr als genug gearbeitet.
- I’ve worked more than enough today.
- Maria läuft verführerischer als Jane.
- Maria walks more seductively than Jane.
- Ich habe weniger von dem Kuchen gegessen als du.
- I ate less of the cake than you.
It’s really simple. The main challenge for most of you will be to get this “more-pattern” deactivated and just add -er. But if you say “mehr teuer” instead of “teurer” you’ll still be understood. Just… be aware and concentrate a bit and it’ll come.
Cool.
Now, for the grading words…there are more than for the equal comparison so let’s just do the important ones…
- Das kostet [nicht] mehr als letztes Jahr.
- That doesn’t cost more than last year.
- Thomas’ Küche ist [kaum / ein bisschen / nur wenig / nicht viel] sauberer als sein Bad.
- Thomas’ kitchen is [barely / a little / scarcely / not much ] cleaner than his bathroom.
- Der Rotwein schmeckt [deutlich / bei weitem / viel / unendlich viel] leckerer als erwartet.
- The red wine is [clearly / by far / a lot / infinitely] tastier than expected.
- Ich gehe dieses Jahr [definitiv /ohne Zweifel / ganz klar / eindeutig] öfter laufen als letztes Jahr.
- This year, I go running [definitely / no doubt / clearly / (unambiguously) ] more often than last year.
Another useful thing might be this very common idiom… which seems to exist in quite a few languages :)
- mehr oder weniger
- more or less
Here, we can also see that the German word for few actually has a regular more-form… or less-form… wenig – weniger. And you can also use that to build less- comparisons. And those do come in handy if the adjective has no real opposite
- Das ist weniger wünschenswert.
- That is less desirable.
All right. And now for the structure…
German Comparisons and Sentence Structure
There are a lot of small structural differences and it would be tedious to look at all them all…. but there are two things that are worth noting. The first one has to do with the equal-comparison. So … wie… as in English, we’re dealing with two parts here but in German there will probably more stuff in between… namely the infamous leftover verb.
- Ich kann fast so schnell denken, wie ich reden kann.
- I can think almost as fast as I can talk.
- Heute habe ich fast so viel vor wie du.
- Today, I have almost as much planned as you. (is that idiomatic?)
- Ich weiß, dass ich nicht so schnell sprechen kann wie ein Muttersprachler.
- I know that I can’t speak as fast as a native speaker.
The German sentences have the usual features. The first 2 are main sentences. So the first part of the verb has its fat ass parked on position 2 and it won’t move an inch… then comes all the rest including the so and then comes the leftover verb. And in the third example, we’re looking at a side-sentence. The verb können (kann) got grossed out by the dass and so it moved to the end. And I know that many of you kinda sorta feel like these examples are against one of the most basic rules so let’s get right to the second structural thing. And this applies to both way… the equal way and the difference way…
- Thomas hat sich mehr von dem Film erwartet als Maria.
- Thomas expected more of the movie than Maria did.
The glaring question about this is “We’ve learned that the verb always goes to the end of the sentence… so uhm… why TF isn’t it there?.”
Well, take this example …
- Ich habe ein Müsli gegessen, weil ich hungrig war.
- I ate a musli because I was hungry.
The because-part belongs to the sentence so based on the rules we’d expect the gegessen to be at the very end. But in fact, the rule should be “The verb goes to the end of the activity”. We have two activities here… eating and being. It is possible to fit in the because-part before the gegessen but having them one after the other is better. Now you are probably like “Okay, yeah I kinda knew that… but what does it have to do with the comparisons?”
Well, let’s take this example…
- Thomas is bigger than Maria.
On the surface, there is only one verb here… to be. But there is actually a second is implied.
- Thomas is bigger than Maria is.
It is the same verb, sure … but it doesn’t have to be. We can replace it by all kinds of other verbs without altering the underlying structure
- Thomas is bigger than Maria thinks/expects/likes/can handle.
Now, let’s try a different example…
- I ate as much as you (ate).
The ate doesn’t give us new information and so it can be left out . And in clunky German it SHOULD be left out.
- Ich habe so viel gegessen, wie du (gegessen h…
This is soooo boring I can’t even finish typing it. We all know what’s going on and there is no need to spell it out. And so the als du just sits there all alone looking as if it had been moved out of the sentence. But no. It is right where it is supposed to be. What I can do is take it and move it INTO the sentence but the normal position is behind the verb… because in the underlying structure there is a second verb, a second activity there.
- Ich habe mehr gegessen, als du dir vorstellen kannst.
- I have eaten more than you can imagine.
Here, we can’t skip the second verb because it’s different to the first. In theory we can still move the whole als-part into the first sentence…
- Ich habe mehr, als du dir vorstellen kannst, gegessen.
But this isn’t very nice. Just like with the because-example we had earlier it is good to keep activities separated. Especially if we’re already in a side-sentence.
- My girlfriend is angry because I slept longer than what we had said.
- Meine Freundin ist sauer, weil ich länger, als wir gesagt haben, geschlafen habe.
I know, you’re probably like “Hmmm… Gesagt haben geschlafen habe … that’s so awful, it’s probably poetic by German standards”. But no… it sounds bad. So it’s better keep the als-part separate.
- Meine Freundin ist sauer, weil ich länger geschlafen habe, als wir gesagt haben.
Bottom line of this… the als-part usually comes AFTER the final verb because in essence it is just a truncated side-sentence.
All right.
We’re almost done for today but there is one more thing we need to talk about…. the word gern. Gern is an adverb that means roughly something like with pleasure. It is used a lot though, and especially so in the construction that means to like.
- Ich schwimme gern.
- I like swimming. (I’ll add a link below for more info on that)
This gern can also be used in comparisons.
- Ich schwimme genauso gern wie ich reite.
- I like swimming as much as I like riding.
And gern also has a more-form… you’ve probably seen it already… it’s lieber.
- Ich trinke lieber Rotwein als Weißwein.
- I drink red wine with “more with pleasurely” than I drink white wine. (lit.)
- I prefer red wine to white wine.
All this is pretty by the book but the whole gern-expression is so different to English, that it seem confusing. It is really used a lot though so it is really worth an effort.
Anyway… I think that’s enough for today. Part 2 will be about endings and the most-form but with what you have learned today you should be set to compare anything to anything.
The 3 important points to take away from this are:
- as … as… translated to so … wie …
- than translates to als
- the more-form in German is always done by adding -er … and adding some umlauts here and there
If you have any questions or suggestions just leave me a comment. I hope you liked it and see you next time.
Check out Part 2 here.
Comparisons in German 2 – The Best
Oh… and if you want to read more…

Hi Emmanuel!
In the example: “Meine Freundin ist sauer, weil ich länger geschlafen habe, als wir gesagt haben.” I don’t understand why is the first “habe” not in front of the “ich”; Sth like: “Meine Freundin ist sauer, weil ich habe länger geschlafen, als wir gesagt haben” (also this can apply to the 2nd oneas well not being in front of ‘wir’)
I had the same question while doing exercises in the previous chapter (sorry if you already answered this, the discussion was too long to read), for example “Die Katze ist sauer, weil das Kind sie nicht in Ruhe lässt.” —> “Die Katze war sauer, weil das Kind sie nicht in Ruhe gelassen hat.”
Thank you for everything you do, my German has really improved!
Best,
Lea
“weil” creates a side-sentence, so the verb goes from position 2 to the end.
– Ich habe länger geschlafen, ….
– …, weil ich länger geschlafen habe,…
When people speak, they often use “weil” with verb in the second position (like “Ich esse, weil ich habe Hunger.”) but this is NOT appropriate for writing and especially not for language learners since everyone will think it’s a mistake.
– “Die Katze ist sauer, weil das Kind sie nicht in Ruhe lässt.”
– “Die Katze war sauer, weil das Kind sie nicht in Ruhe gelassen hat.”
In both examples, ALL the verbs are at the end. The only difference is that the second one has the helper verb haben there as well.
Hope that helps :)
Hi Emmanuel!
In this example you gave, du is in the nominative.
Is it always the case? If not do you have an examples?
Thanks a lot for all your work
The case after “als” depends on the role the elements in the comparison have.
– Ich habe dir mehr Kuchen gegeben als mir.
– Ich habe Maria öfter gesehen als dich.
Hope that helps.
It does, thanks :)
Can you explain how the sentence structure also changes? I like Pizza as much as I like Pasta = Ich Mag Pasta so sehr wie Ich mag pasta or ich pasta Mag? Does the verb also go at the end here? So is it like a connecting sentence?
Dear Emmanuel, THANK YOU SO MUCH for explaining about the verb kann being at the end of the phrase, I finally can make sense of it because it’s not explained on the other platform. Many thanks.
Happy I could help!!
Thank you so much for these lessons.
Emanuel
How would I translate the comparative ursprünglicheren in this sentence: Es kam schon im 19ten Jahrhundert zu uns, wobei sich aus der ursprünglicheren Bedeutung, die heute geläufigere herausgebildet hat?
Vielen Dank
I think I would go with “original meaning” or “older”. To be more precise, you’d need half a sentence and I think that’s just not worth it.
Hi Emanuel! Why did you stop doing quizzes? It was so helpful
Actually, I started adding quizzes later, after first publishing the articles, and I haven’t gotten this far yet :)
Aha ok thanks for the answer, saw more quizzes later. Keep pumping up the awesome materials!
As to the sentence: er ist nicht so gross als ich …it’s a negative comparison, and in English, I still say: he is not so tall as I. Sue me.
Papers are on their way!
Seriously though, for context, what part of the English speaking world are you from?
I’m asking because I wonder if this is a BE vs AE thing.
Oh and just to make sure:
It should be
Danke für das “wie.” Ich wurde in Boston geboren. Bis 2005 habe ich im Nordost gewohnt: Boston (erste zwölf Jahre) Maine high school), Vermont (college), New York City (graduate school and later, living) und Connecticut (36 Jahre). Seit 2005: Albuquerque.
Wenn ich fragen darf, was bedeutet BE vs AE? Keine Ahnung.
Ah, das bedeutet “British English” und “American English”. Zumindest habe ich das oft in diesem Kontext gesehen :)
I learnt my equal-comparisons with the help of this Ohrwurm https://youtu.be/tcFRF5ZaGns
Hahaha, how did you come across this song?
Right at the beginning of my German-learning journey I asked a friend for some songs in German and he gave me several in different genres. This was one of them:
Schlager = Songs that everybody pretends to hate but that will go on very late into the night, in a weird specifically German social ritual (sort of like Disco Polo?). They are quite bad, you have been warned.
Helene Fischer – Atemlos durch die Nacht https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=haECT-SerHk
Olaf Henning – Cowboy und Indianer https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-dIRsi3j0uU
Spider Murphy Gang – Skandal im Sperrbezirk https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=StgXz5S8g48
Donikkl – Fliegerlied https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tcFRF5ZaGns
I use music as one of my main tools really, (the others being you, Lingopie, and YouTube). When you find a catchy song, you want to listen to it multiple times, find out what it means, and sing along. This is exactly what I’ve been recommended to do to learn to speak, but it doesn’t feel like work, so I can do it for hours a day.
Thanks, now I have ear pain :D.
Seriously though, songs are great. Helped me a lot back when I was first “boosting” my English to prepare for my students exchange abroad.
*******************
EVERYONE!!! URGENT!! READ THIS!!
******************
Someone once recommended a site in the comments where you’d see the lyrics of a song and people could (and would) add translations and some explanations for context. I can’t remember it nor find it though.
Maybe someone reading the comments knows it.
Maybe you’re referring to the Genius website?
YES!!! That’s the one. Amazing, thank you!
Glad I could help!
Mein auto ist billiger als der bus oder den bus… Wenn der bus ,dann warum benutzen wir der bus.. Warum nicht den bus????
Es ist “der Bus”.
Er hat die gleiche Rolle wie “mein Auto”, also Subjekt. Deshalb ist er auch im Nominativ.
Macht das Sinn?
Vielen Dank für deine Übungen! Sie sind extrem hilfreich.
Freut mich, danke :)!
Hi, you mentioned a part 2 where you explain a difference between between am besten and das Beste and so on. Did you do a part 2, and if so, where can i find it?
I have to admit, I haven’t done it yet :/. For shame! I actually honestly forgot that it’s missing, and just realized this year when I went through the course.
It’s on my list for 2021. Sorry for that!
Oh please give us part 2! Don’t do this to us :'(
Another vote for part 2! Please!
Noted :)!
Yet another vote for part 2 bitte
I’ll set up a post now, so I don’t forget and I’ll do it in fall!! Promise! If I fail, you get a discount!
Did you do part 2 yet? :D
Argh…. nope :D. Still not. But I really want to do it this year!
I’ll ask you again on December :D
Please do so I can post the link here :D
I was thinking about your example: Der Winter ist so gut wie vorbei.
The winter is practically over.
In English there are really subtle differences between as good as, almost, and practically although people often use almost and practically as interchangeable.
Here is how I use them.
As good as over implies that it isn’t over yet but for some reason something has made it seem as though it is.
Practically implies that you are on the precipice of it being over..
Almost is further back than the precipice but close.
Is there a distinction in German like that? It’s so typical of English to have three words with such nuanced differences.
Well, the options are:
– fast
– quasi
– so gut wie
– im Prinzip
and I bet a few more that I can’t think of.
“fast” is the furthest back, but still it can come very close to the edge. In terms of winter, I would say like two weeks or so. And the others would work well for two weeks as well. It depends on what you’re talking about actually.
If you’re talking about ordering a new load of firewood even though you still have some, then the precipice “feels” different than if you’re talking about a last minute skiing trip then the precipice is still a bit away.
Not sure, if that makes sense :).
But that’s why I can’t really put them in an order. I don’t think it would hold up in practice.
Thanks! I guess German has the same nuanced kinds of meanings. Most people in the US don’t really think about them, they just use them instinctively. I never thought about how I use them until I saw your example. It just didn’t feel quite right, not wrong, just not what I would have said. It’s interesting how much I’ve thought about English and how I use it while learning German. Love your blog, it always makes me think.
Yeah, that’s one of the perks of language learning… you really get to see new ways of expressing things and you get a better feel for your own language, I think.
Hi, I came across this sentence and am a bit confuse what happens after the “und” because I thought it is similar to wie, and als work in the way that it resets the sentence structure, and because it doesn’t normally send the verb to the end, I am not sure what ist is still there. Thanks
“Weil ich Geburtstag habe und ein Restaurant schöner ist.”
“und” is a connector word that connects elements that have the same “status” and role in the sentence. But it works for all kinds of elements.
It can connect two nouns:
– Ich trinke kaffe und Tee.
or two normal sentences:
– Ich trinke Kaffee und (ich) lese Zeitung.
or two verbs.
– Ich will Zeitung lesen und Kaffee trinken.
or – and this is what happens here – two side sentences
– weil ich Geburtstag haben und (weil) ein Restaurant schöner ist…
The “weil” spans over into the second half.
Hope that helps :)
Ich bin ueber deine Online-Kurse gestolpert, und finde die bloss genauso super wie eine Schatzkiste.
Vielen Dank!
Super, das freut mich :). Danke für das schöne Kompliment!!
Eine kleine Korrektur: das “bloss” passt nicht wirklich in den Satz. Was wolltest du damit sagen?
“A is not as big as B.
Here, the size is NOT equal,”
English is tricky here. In context this often means that A is smaller than B instead of meaning that A is not equal to B. So I want to double check the meaning of “Thomas ist so groß wie John”. Does it always mean the heights are the same, or does it always mean that Thomas is at least as tall, or could it be either depending on context like in English?
Great observation! German is the same as English I would say, so
– Thomas is nicht so groß wie Marcus.
I would understand that to mean that Thomas is smaller.
When you say “so groß wie” that does imply equal-ness though. So not smaller, not taller but the same.
schön
Thank you so much! I never knew where to put the comparison elements within the sentence. Now I know; always at the end.
“Always” in sense of “almost always” of course :)… I am sure there is an exception somewhere.
Hello Emmanuel, gibt es ein Unterschied zwischen mieten und verpachten (to rent). Herzlichen dank, Lucius
Hi Lucius,
ja den gibt es. Ich musste aber auch erstmal nachschauen, denn es ist was rechtliches. Also… eine Quelle sagt folgendes:
Pacht = Nutzung + Fruchtziehung
Die Fruchtziehung bedeutet, dass du die Erzeugnisse des gepachteten Objekts behalten kannst. Pachtest du z.B. eine Kuh, die dann ein Kalb kriegt, dann gehört das Kalb dir. Bei Miete wäre das nicht so. (Hier die Quelle: https://www.anwalt-berlin-blog.de/2009/06/was-ist-der-unterschied-zwischen-miete-und-pacht/
In der Praxis ist es allerdings nicht so einfach und die Grenzen zwischen Miete und Pacht sind fließend.
Wenn ich ein Restaurant habe und ich sage, du kannst die Räume benutzen, dann ist das Miete. Wenn ich sage, du kannst das Personal, die Kaffeemaschine, die Spülmaschine, die Kasse und den Namen auch nutzen und den Gewinn behalten, dann ist das Pacht.
Ich hoffe, das hilft. Sag Bescheid, wenn du eine Übersetzung von einer Stelle brauchst :)
Schönes Wochenende, Ema
jetzt ist es ganz klar. Herzlichen Dank Emmanuel !! Lucius
Please can you tell me if there are any differences between da hinten, hinten & da vorne, vorne or they are interchangeable?
Well, the words alone use your personal coordinate system … so if you and your friend are facing a direction and you say “vorne” then he or she will look forward. With “da” you can point in any direction and define that as “vorne”. So you and your friend sit in a park and you see a pretty woman from afar. The you can say
Siehst du die Frau dahinten/davorne/da?
and so long as you point, it’s fine. It’s your choice what is “vorne” and what is “hinten” after all. But if you just say
Siehst du die Frau vorne?
then this wouldn’t apply for a woman that is on the right. Hope that helps.