
Hello everyone,
and welcome back to our look at the German past tense. Last time we spoke about what we call the written past (‘dem scholars call it preterit) and we’ve seen that it’s fairly similar to how it works in English. So some verbs build the form with an ending, others change their stem and for those you should just learn what change is happening.
If you haven’t read that part or you’re like “Hmm… I feel a bit shaky, maybe I should review” then you can find it here
Oh wait, wrong link…
“Man, Emanuel, you really can’t help it with these silly jokes, can you?”
Nah, not really.
Anyway, what will we do today? Today we’ll find out the verbs you need to use the written past are the idiomatic choice even for spoken German and we’ll check what effect is created when the other form is used. Because that varies. For some verbs it just sounds strange, for others it actually could change the meaning.
Sounds like we’re in for a lot of fun. Okay, no actually it sounds like work. But make no mistake, the things we talk about today are crucial if you want to speak idiomatic German. So let’s dive right in, shall we….
When to use the written past
Super quick recap first. German has two forms of past tense. The boring, old school oh-my-god-we-love-Latin-so-much-names are preterit and perfect but we call them written past and spoken past.
Why? Because the spoken past is mostly used in spoken German, the written past is used for novels and such.
Most verbs, 98.6152 % I’d say, use spoken past in spoken language, no matter the content. That’s a big difference to how it is in English and Germans really have to hustle to wrap their heads around the use of present perfect.
But anyway, for the remaining… uh… few verbs the written past is the idiomatic choice in spoken German.
Problem is, that these few verbs are pretty much the mostest verbs ever, so written past is effectively used all the time. Just like the world’s wealth. The top 1 percent get like 50% of the pie.
Looks like they have some serious free market capitalism going on, too.
Anyway, so this was our little recap. And now let’s find out for which verbs we need the written past.
haben, sein and the Modals
These are really not a big surprise. They all have their special conjugation and they’re super common. Luckily the forms are not that crazy, and for haben and sein the connection to English really shows.
- Ich hatte gestern einen Kater.
- I had a hangover yesterday.
- Practice pronunciation – click once to start recording and again to stop
- Ich war vorgestern auf einer Party.
- I was at a party the day before yesterday.
- Practice pronunciation – click once to start recording and again to stop
| ____ | sein | haben |
| ich | war | hatte |
| du | warst | hattest |
| er/sie/es | war | hatte |
| wir | waren | hatten |
| ihr | wart | hattet |
| sie | waren | hatten |
| – |
It’s actually a bit ironic that haben and sein would use the written past for themselves. I mean… they play such a big role in forming the spoken past. But then again, it would be kind of double.
- Ich habe gestern keine Zeit gehabt. (sounds “clumsy”)
- Ich hatte gestern keine Zeit.
- I didn’t have time yesterday.
- Practice pronunciation – click once to start recording and again to stop
- Wo bist du gewesen? (sounds a bit high brow)
- Wo warst du?
- Where have you been/where were you?
You’ll probably hear the spoken past versions here and there. Some people might even claim that there’s a difference in meaning but even if there is – that’s interesting for a linguist but for a language learner it’s a waste of time as absolute as −269.15 Celsius (4 Kelvin)… get it? Get it? Haha. Physics puns. They’re the best.
What’s that? Oh 4 Kelvin is NOT absolute zero? Well I guess you haven’t heard of this thing called Global Warming then. Duuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuh. And it’s gonna be at 10 Kelvin if we don’t cut emissions of gr…
“Hey Emanuel, why don’t YOU cut your emissions of bullshit for a start.”
Uh… uhm… okay.
Let’s move on to the modals. Their forms are not that similar to the English counterparts, but they are actually pretty much in line with the regular written past we learned in the last part.
- Ich konnte letzte Nacht nicht schlafen.
- I couldn’t sleep last night.
- Practice pronunciation – click once to start recording and again to stop
- “Wo warst du denn gestern? Die Party war voll cool.”
“Ich wollte kommen, aber ich musste eine Präsentation fertig machen.” - “Where were you yesterday? The party was really great.”
“I wanted to come, but I had to finish a presentation.” - Practice pronunciation – click once to start recording and again to stop
- Am Anfang mochte Thomas seine neue Kollegin nicht.
- In the beginning, Thomas didn’t really like his new colleague.
- Practice pronunciation – click once to start recording and again to stop
- “Du solltest mich nach der Arbeit anrufen.”
“Ich weiß. Ich hab’s vergessen.” - “You were supposed to call me after work.”
“I know. I forgot.” - Practice pronunciation – click once to start recording and again to stop
- Der kleine Tim durfte gestern zum ersten Mal Assassin’s Creed spielen.
- Little Tim was allowed to play Assassin’s Creed for the first time.
- Practice pronunciation – click once to start recording and again to stop
If there’s an umlaut, you take it away and you have to note that for mögen you have to change the “g” to “ch” but that’s really it. The rest is like we know it. That’s why I’ll only give you the full table for können. You can do the others yourself :).
| ____ | können |
| ich | konnt-e |
| du | konnt-est |
| er/sie/es | konnt-e |
| wir/sie | konnt-en |
| ihr | konnt-et |
Now, how’s it with the spoken past for the modals? Is it idiomatic?
Well, for some it is and you might hear it once in a while but believe me… you do not want to do that.
Why? Well, this is what spoken past of modals would look like if we use the rules we learned
- Ich habe arbeiten gemusst.
- I had to work.
- Ich habe das nicht machen gewollt.
- I did not want to do that.
Problem is that
THESE ARE WRONG!!!
Spoken past for modals works a little differently. For one thing, you do NOT use a ge-form but the dictionary form (infinitive)
- Ich habe arbeiten müssen.
- Ich habe das nicht machen wollen.
And that’s the easy part. It gets really tricky once you start making side sentence. But let’s not go there. These things are for advanced learners. Don’t get me wrong. It’s not that they’re super difficult or anything. You can comprehend the rules, no problem. But thinking about this stuff and trying to apply it will slow you down big time whilst not making your German sound any better. Just stick with the written past for the modals until you’re fluent.
Cool.
Now with usual suspects for special behavior out of the way, let’s take a look at which other verbs use the written past and when they do it. Oh and before you get confused… I will NOT give you the full conjugation table for the verbs.
Yeah, I know….
#emanuel #worstteacher #giveusthetables
But hey… if you want it, you do it :). If you’re not sure, just review the last post in this series or just ask me in the comments. But you can do it, you’re smart enough. That’s a big part of language learning in my opinion actually – getting over the language-angst, realizing that you’re smart enough to understand the rules and apply them. You need to get rid of that doubt that says “Ohh, what I think is probably wrong,” because often it isn’t wrong at all. And even if it is… you need to say it with Trumpian resolve.
Seriously, you got this! And I really mean that!
But enough with the pep-talk… let’s look at the verbs.
“gehen” – “ging” or “ist gegangen”
There are essentially two gehens we’re dealing with; the factual gehen with the idea of going places, and then all the various abstract metaphorical variations of things going. The factual gehen uses the spoken past, the more abstract, metaphorical gehen usually works with the written past.
- Ich bin zu Aldi gegangen.
- I have gone/went to Aldi.
- Practice pronunciation – click once to start recording and again to stop
- Das Konzert war scheiße. Sei froh, dass du nicht hingegangen bist.
- The concert was shit. Be glad you didn’t go [there].
- Practice pronunciation – click once to start recording and again to stop
- Gestern ging es mir nicht so gut.
- I didn’t feel very well yesterday.
- Practice pronunciation – click once to start recording and again to stop
- Ich habe versucht, den Computer aufzumachen, aber das ging nicht.
- I tried opening the computer but it wasn’t possible (the plan wasn’t “going”)
- Practice pronunciation – click once to start recording and again to stop
And gehen is pretty strict about this. Here are two examples where I used the “wrong” past version:
- Mir ist es gestern nicht gut gegangen.
- I wasn’t feeling well yesterday.
- Das Konzert war scheiße. Sei froh, dass du nicht hingingst.
- The concert was shit. Be glad, you didn’t go [there].
The first example is super clumsy sounding, the second one sounds like you’re standing on a theater stage performing a play from 300 years ago.
So rule of thumb for gehen: spoken past for going places, written past for the rest.
“finden” – “fand” or “hat gefunden”
Just like with gehen, we have a factual and a metaphorical side of the verb. The factual one is actual finding, as in finding your phone or just a 10 dollar bill on the street. The abstract one is finden in sense of opinion – a usage that is much more common in German than it is in English.
And based on what we learned about gehen, what would you say which finden uses which past form?
Exactly! The factual one works with the spoken past, the opinion-finden takes written past.
- Ich habe die Mütze gefunden.
- I found the hat.
- Practice pronunciation – click once to start recording and again to stop
- Hast du eine Wohnung gefunden?
- Have you found an apartment/a flat?
- Practice pronunciation – click once to start recording and again to stop
- Ich fand die Mütze zu teuer.
- I found the hat too expensive.
- Practice pronunciation – click once to start recording and again to stop
- Wie fand’st du den Film? (“e” is often swallowed in spoken German)
- How did you like the movie?/What did you think of the movie?
(lit.: “How did you find the movie?”.. super common phrasing)
Just like gehen, finden is pretty strict, so you shouldn’t mix up the two.
- Ich fand mein Telefon.
- Ich habe den Film gut gefunden.
The first one sounds incomplete. Like… you didn’t tell us your opinion yet. And the second one leans a bit toward the idea that you had no problem finding the cinema.
Just to make sure though… there’s technically nothing wrong with these. It’s just that people don’t ever say this and that’s why it sounds strange.
So … spoken past for the factual finding, written past for the metaphorical ones. I wonder if we found a pattern here. Let’s see.
“sehen” – “sah” or “hat gesehen”
Sehen itself pretty much always uses the spoken past.
- Maria hat gestern einen Film gesehen.
- Maria watched a movie yesterday.
- Practice pronunciation – click once to start recording and again to stop
- Ich hab’ gestern bei der Party Brad Pitt gesehen.
- I saw Brad Pitt at the party yesterday.
- Practice pronunciation – click once to start recording and again to stop
And using the written past would once again sound a bit archaic or pompous. Like in this famous quote by Cesar.
- Ich kam, ich sah, ich siegte.
- Practice pronunciation – click once to start recording and again to stop
Now, for sehen, there isn’t a common abstract use that would be worth mentioning. But there is a SUPER useful prefix version: aussehen. Aussehen is to look in sense of someone’s appearance. And for this one, you should stick with written past.
- Maria sah gestern echt gut aus.
- Maria looked great yesterday.
- Practice pronunciation – click once to start recording and again to stop
- Ich wollte gestern joggen gehen, aber es sah nach Regen aus.
- I wanted to go running but it looked like rain.
- Practice pronunciation – click once to start recording and again to stop
For the du-form the spoken past is actually the slightly better sounding option though. so please… don’t take any of this as a rule set in stone. It’s just a description of what’s more likely.
“geben” – “gab” or “hat geben”
(I mixed up the colors here, sorry for that)
The literal geben, the one about giving someone something, uses the spoken past. But even if you’re a beginner, you might have already come across the other geben, the really confusing abstract geben – geben in the sense of “there is” (“es gibt”). This one uses written past and kaboooooooooom…
#patternconfirmed
To be honest though, geben is not as strict as finden.
- I gave you the book.
- Ich habe dir das Buch gegeben…. proper spoken German
- Ich gab dir das Buch.
(sounds stilted and old school. Like you’re studying literature or something)
- 100 years ago, there were bears in this forest.
- Vor 100 Jahren gab es in diesem Wald Bären.
- Vor 100 Jahren hat es in diesem Wald Bären gegeben.
(Sounds a bit more complicated than it needs to be, but not too bad either)
The written past in the first one does sound quite stilted, but the spoken past in the second is not exactly beautiful, but it rings okay; to my ears anyway.
And the next two verbs are even more laissez-faire about it.
“stehen” (“stand” vs “gestanden”) and “liegen” (“lag” vs “hat gelegen”)
Stehen and liegen in the sense of being positioned usually uses the spoken past BUT the written past sounds fine, too, especially for objects.
- “Meine Beine tun weh und meine Nase läuft.”
“Warum das denn?”
” Ich habe 5 Stunden im Regen in der Schlange gestanden.”
“Ich stand 5 Stunden im Regen in der Schlange.” - “My legs hurt and my nose is running.”
“Oh, why?”
“I was standing in line in the rain for five hours. “
- Ich hab’ bis um 2 im Bett gelegen. (sounds better)
- Ich lag bis um 2 im Bett.
- I stayed/was lying in bed till 2.
- Das Buch lag auf dem Tisch. (sounds better)
- Das Buch hat auf dem Tisch gelegen.
- The book was lying on the table.
In some contexts one past version is preferable for the other but looking into details like this would be like laying out carpet in your new home when the walls aren’t even finished.
When it comes to the abstract uses, things are as usual: the written past is by far the more idiomatic choice.
- In der Mail stand nichts von einem Vertrag.
- The email said nothing about a contract.
- Practice pronunciation – click once to start recording and again to stop
- “Der Abend war nicht so schön, aber das lag nicht an dir.”
- “The evening wasn’t that great but that’s not on you/your fault.”
- Practice pronunciation – click once to start recording and again to stop
Oh, those are the main abstract use of stehen and liegen, by the way. Tadah. “Liegen an” is a common way to assign responsibility and stehen is the German counterpart to to say in contexts of the content of texts.
Wow, contexts of the content of texts…. what a messy sentence :).
All right.
Now, we’ve seen that there is a pattern, or actually let’s call it more of a trend. But for there are also some verbs that leave it completely up to you.
Simple Past or Perfect – wissen, denken, werden
For these ones it really doesn’t matter, which past version you pick. Both ways sound fine, both are used and you can pick whichever is easier for you.
- Ich dachte, du weißt das.
- Ich hab’ gedacht, du weißt das.
- I thought you knew that.
- Ich wusste das nicht.
- Ich habe das nicht gewusst.
- I didn’t know that.
- Die Bar ist vor 2 Monaten eröffnet worden.
- Die Bar wurde vor 2 Monaten eröffnet.
- The bar was opened 2 months ago.
Actually werden is a bit controversial. Some books, online sources and teachers argue that there indeed is a clear and fleshed out difference in meaning between the two past versions for werden. But I have to say... whenever I come across that I’m basically like this:
Well… with a two day old beard. But yeah, I don’t care that much and neither should you. There is some underlying trend but there are thousands upon thousands of examples that show that people DO NOT make a distinction in meaning, so at least for a learner it doesn’t matter.
Now, these were not ALL the verbs that, at times anyway, get used with written past in spoken German. Kommen (kam-), hängen (hing-), laufen (lief-), kennen (kannt-) would be some other examples. But I actually think with the pattern or trend we’ve found you should be fine – the abstract meanings tend to work with written past, the factual ones with spoken. Let’s try it.
- Ich laufe nach Hause. (I walk home.)
- Die Prüfung läuft gut. (The exam goes well.)
What would you say, which one takes which past?
Exactly, number 1 sounds better with spoken past, number 2 with written past.
- Ich bin nach Hause gelaufen.
- Die Prüfung lief gut.
I guess we should also mention that there are significant regional differences, especially for the less common ones. Like… the South uses spoken past for pretty much everything while the North sticks with written past more often. Because the North remembers.
It remembers the time before the spoken past came around.
That’s an interesting topic actually, because knowing the origin of the spoken past and the English Present Perfect could give us some cool insights into why the present perfect is the way it is and also to how this shines through in the German spoken past. In fact, we’ve talked about the evolution of Present Perfect before (I’ll add a link below).
But I think we’ve had enough input for the day and we’ll wrap it up here.
This was our look at when to use the written past in spoken German and guess what:
we’re actually DONE with the past tense.
You now know everything you need to know for daily conversation. Hooray :).
As always, if you have any questions about any of the things we’ve talked about today or if you want to talk about the usage of some verbs that I haven’t mentioned today in more detail, just leave me a comment.
I hope you liked it and see you next time.
Oh… in case you’re a beginner and you don’t know what to learn next: by now, you should know
- present tense
- past tense
- main sentences
- questions
- the first part of adjective endings
If you haven’t completed this list yet, head right over to the course section and do it. If you know all this already, now is the perfect time to look into cases ;).
Further Reading:

Die Bar ist vor 2 Monaten eröffnet worden.
Die Bar wurde vor 2 Monaten eröffnet.
Die Bar war vor 2 Monaten eröffnet
Is there a difference between the 3rd sentence and the 1st and 2nd sentence?
Can I just use ‘war’ instead?
“Die Bar war vor 2 Monaten eröffnet.”
This sounds weird. A bit like it was open two months ago but is not open anymore.
Do not use this.
Wow – came back to check on my modals (which ones have umlauts, usw) and I see you have done a LOT of clean up work here! It looks better, reads better, and the list of articles and topics at the bottom really helps organize the material. Language, like music, has limbs that can be so big (and that spawn other limbs) that knowing when you have to tell a student “There is a lot more out there, but for now, we need to go back to the trunk and go further up the tree” is a real judgement call. Without the limbs, the tree is nothing but a stick, but people can get lost in the twigs and leaves if they can’t find the trunk. I really enjoy seeing how things change (always for the better) on this site. PS – I like how you include haben and sein with the standard modals. They behave LIKE them and they are the trunk of the tree.
Thanks a lot and I really love your tree metaphor and your improvisation over it!!
On “geben” it looks like you accidentally highlighted “spoken past” in blue instead of green. I was confused for about 2 seconds, but got over it fairly quickly. :)
Oh sorry for that! I can’t fix it right now, but I put a disclaimer there to at least save others the confusion. Thanks for letting me know!!
lmao… Was für eine Stimme für “Ich kam, ich sah, ich siegte.“
Das ist tatsächlich Julius Cäsar. Man hat vor ein paar Jahren bei Ausgrabungen (excavations) alte Tapes aus Rom gefunden, und digital rekonstruiert ;)
Hi Emanuel,
I have to write something for a Hochzeit Gästebuch and I assumed that the spoken past would be used. Is this correct?
Some examples I have found use the written past for all the past tense verbs.
I don’t want to get it wrong!
Depends on what tone you’re going for. If you want to narrate a longer story about one of the newly weds, then maybe written past sounds more epic, if it’s just a small note like “Great wedding, I enjoyed it a lot” then definitely spoken past.
Thanks for the response.
Definitely feel more confident now.
Hello,
I wanted to ask about the other “sehen” prefix words (ansehen, umsehen, etc) . Do they also use written past more often or is it just “aussehen” that does it?
Some of them like “ansehen” sometimes can work with both, but generally, spoken past is more common for them.
Great article. Thanks for clarifying something I’d long suspected but couldn’t crystallise.
For modals you give two examples:
But a little later you conclude, “Just stick with the written past for the modals until you’re fluent.” Equivalent examples in the written past however are not given. Should the spoken idiomatic forms be:
You also mention geben used figuratively, eg Alles ging gut. I think you can also use laufen in this context, namely… Alles lief gut.
BTW I personally find the labels “written past” and “spoken past” a little confusing, ie saying one can use the written past for some verbs in spoken German. The way I learnt it was there are two tenses: the imperfect tense and the (past) perfect tense. The latter is colloquially known as the “conversational tense” which is supplanted by the former for some important common verbs—because it just sounds more fluid. I know the former is otherwise used exclusively in news reporting and stories about past events without any need to give it a colloquial labeI. I know it’s nuanced but it works for me.
Yes, the two written past sentences you made are correct and the natural choice in daily life.
You also mention geben used figuratively, eg Alles ging gut.
Where do I mention “Alles ging gut?”
“laufen” is indeed the natural choice here and “gehen” does not really work (I’m talking more about this in an upcoming article).
As for the names… totally agree that they’re not ideal, but they’re plastered all over the site at this point and I think it’s better to stay consistent. I’ve been using these for 10+ years now.
When I came up with them, I wanted to specifically not use English tense names because that adds a layer of confusion and possibly false parallels.
So yeah… I’m kind of relying on people understanding what I mean and then just supplement whichever terms work best for them in their mind, pretty much like you do it :)
Under “gehen” you give example of “ging” used figuratively. “Alles ging gut” was just my own example. My Austrian wife suggests either ging or lief sound fine to her ears in this example. I guess it’s another one of those regional things. It’s a small matter.
She also confirmed that the perfect (“spoken past”) is used almost exclusively in Austria with the exceptions generally as you describe. She noted, as you do, that northern Germans typically make bigger use of the imperfect (“written past”) in conversation—paralleling English more. I think I’ve noticed it too. All very interesting.
BTW When I first learned German, even after a few years, I still found it often unnatural or awkward to use the past perfect where English “demanded” the simple past (imperfect). But now, after more usage, the past perfect in Austria seems the only natural way.
So to my ears, there’s a difference between “laufen” and “gehen” in a figurative sense, with “laufen” being about a process, and “gehen” being more binary about “works/doesn’t work” or about feeling.
I’m talking about “gehen” in the most recent article and “laufen” in this sense is coming up soon, but yeah… in your example, I would say “Alles LIEF gut.” because you’re clearly talking about how a process went.
Hope that helps.
And Glückwunsch for your Sprachgefühl about past perfect :). It’s really fascinating when that happens in a new language and you can basically see how your brain gets “used” to something and then wants it to be that way all of a sudden.
Hi Emanuel, great article! One thing I’m not sure though. You said that when verbs are used in a figurative/abstract sense they tend to use Preterit and the examples were quite clear, but what about those verb-preposition combos that change the original meaning of the verb.
Think about “ankommen”, which literally means to arrive (no preposition combo), therefore it would likely use the Perfect when forming the past.
However if we consider the combo “ankommen auf”, which means to depend on someone, the verb itself changes meaning. I think it leans more towards an figurative/abstract sense than a literal one. Would this one use Preterit or Perfekt when speaking in the past?
Quick correction:
verb-preposition combos
Would you mean is “prefix verbs”. The “verb preposition combos” is better for things like “warten auf” where you need a fixed preposition to go with the verb but it’s NOT a prefix.
About your question:
Yes, for the prefix versions goes the same.
– Ich bin um 9 angekommen.
– Es kam auf mich an.
I am Vers confused. Do we place the sentences in written or spoken past?
You’re referring to th exercise, right? You have pick/decide depending on the meaning/context.
Thank you so much! Why do 3 and 5 take the spoken past tense?
Because they’re the “normal” meaning of the verb… actual giving and actual seeing.
Echt? Hat niemand gefragt wer die Frau ist?
Statt
du solltest mich nach der Arbeit anrufen. Du hättest mich nach der Arbeit anrufen sollen. Geht das?Ja, the difference is that “solltest” talks about what was the agreement, and “hättest sollen” talks about what would have been the proper course of action. There’s an overlap of course.
I get it, thank you. BTW great website. My German studies are in Houston, TX.
Danke dir! Viele Grüße nach Texas!
so i meant to ask you this but forgot. i think i heard someone use “empfand” in conversation the other day, or maybe a podcast.
Is it normal?
And also to use prateritum for prefix versions of findeń in spoken deutsch?
Like “es befand sich in der Müllerstraße”
or
“ich fand heraus, dass mein Onkel sein ganzes Geld verschwunden hatte”
or
”Fast keine weißt, dass Hegel die Playstation erfand”
hi Emanuel, if you missed this i’d still be interested to know your thoughts..
It’s normal, but maybe not super common.
All your examples sound a bit like written German, like someone journaling, but I wouldn’t raise an eyebrow if I heard them spoken.
cool thanks
Great presentation. If you have more sentences in which one must choose between the two past tenses, please let me know. I do have a question. Knowing that there’s no IMPERFECT tense in German as there is in French, do you know if it is okay to use the simple past in spoken German where the French use the Imperfect? Danke schön!
I can’t answer that. You should use the German tenses in German as I described here. It doesn’t matter what it would be in French, because German and French use different “paradigms”.
Once again, YDG had the right thing for me at the right time. Was watching “Kleo” on Netflix (2nd time through, this time German with German subtitles), and noted that ‘ging’ was used in a few scenes. I started wondering which verbs and modals used the written past more and under what circumstances. This article helps clarify exactly that. Thank you.
As a German teacher in the states your explanations help. As a native speaker myself I find it sometimes hard to explain this types of things. Where are are you from in Germany? I’m from Hannover. I think I use written past more than average :)
I’m from Berlin.
I think I use it below average, but it’s not just region but also age group and peer group, that influences how much someone uses it.
Glad you find my work helpful, even as a native :)!! Liebe Grüße
Hey Emanuel,
A small nit-pick: The spoken past in the first line in geben section uses the blue color instead of green.
One of your sentences above is, “Wo warst du denn gestern?” With my little practice so farm in German, the sentence doesn’t sound weird, but I don’t think I would have ever guessed to add the “denn” in the sentence. Why is it not simply, “Wo warst du gestern?”
That’s also correct! “denn” is often added to questions, to express a range of vibes, but it doesn’t really change the question itself.
You can check out my article on “denn” if you want to dig deeper, but it’s nothing you need to worry about as a beginner.
Just don’t use it for now :)
Okay, good to know. I’m making my way through the grammar courses right now, so I guess I’ll be getting to the article on “denn” soon enough. Subscribed and loving the content. Thank you!!
Not directly. Single words are not part of the grammar progression. You can find the archive in the menu under vocabulary, or you can just search for the word. The “details” there will have a link to the article then.
If you’re curious about it, just read it now, before interest wanes :)
Ich weiß nicht, wie man das sagt. * in past tense
Is that homework?
this was a super helpful lesson that I WAS NEVER TAUGHT in class (insert crying emoji)
Well, it found its way to you :)!
Hi, I just wanted to leave the exercises here even tho there are the solutions, but I did answer first and then heard them, so;
I corrected the ones I got wrong, but yes, there’s that :)