
Hello everyone,
and welcome to another German Word of the Day “What is the difference”-special.
And today, we’ll look at a difference that many of you didn’t even know was a thing that you need to be aware of – the difference between
erst, nur and einzig
All three are translations for only, but they’re not synonyms. Of course. I mean – we’re talking about German, after all. I mean, come on. There’s always more than one word for a thing.
Mixing up erst and nur or einzige and nur is a pretty common mistake learners make, often without realizing. You’ll usually be understood and chances are native speakers won’t tell you because busy switching over to English…. I mean, in Berlin they do that.
But yeah, using the wrong “only” in German sounds pretty bad and it’s definitely a mistakes worth fixing.
Today, we’ll go over each of the three words one by one and see what they mean and when to use which and I’ll also give you a bit of background about the words, because if you know WHY they mean what they mean, it’ll stick in the brain much better.
So if you’re ready, let’s hop right in.
The meaning of “einzige”
Einzige pretty much directly comes from eins which means one.
The ig-ending usually makes an adjective out of something and add a sense of “like”, so in a way “einsig” literally means “one-like”.
And the z … well, it sounds harsher so German was like “Hell yeah.”
But yeah, einzig is technically the most literal translation of only. And guess what… only is the exact same thing. Is used to literally be “one-like” and was used like an adjective. So in a phrasing like this one:
- This path is the only way across the icy mountains.
Only then broadened and became the word it is today (I think it’s an adverb… when in doubt, it’s usually an adverb). Einzige on the other hand didn’t change and it is an adjective to this day.
- Ich war der einzige Spanier im Deutschkurs.
- I was the only Spanish guy in German class.
- Practice pronunciation – click once to start recording and again to stop
- Das einzige, was mir gefallen hat, war, wo er mit dem Drachen gesprochen hat.
- The only thing that I liked was when he was talking with the dragon.
- Practice pronunciation – click once to start recording and again to stop
In the second example, there is no noun following the einzige. This is because in German all adjectives can do the job of a noun.
- Thomas ist der einzige, dem Maria ihr Geheimnis verraten hat.
- Thomas is the only one, whom Maria has told her secret.
- Practice pronunciation – click once to start recording and again to stop
Now, whenever people feel like einzige is not only enough, they go for einzigste… we could think of it as “only-est”. Sound stupid but it is very wide spread. There’s a website that collects snapshots of it … it’s everywhere… in ads, in signs… even in a tattoo (check out the page here). You should definitely stick with einzige for now :).
Now, you can find einzig here and there outside of this adjective context…
- Du bist echt einzigartig.
- You’re truly unique.
- Practice pronunciation – click once to start recording and again to stop
- Das ist einzig und allein Thomas’ Schuld.
- That is solely Thomas’ fault.
- Practice pronunciation – click once to start recording and again to stop
- Das Essen war echt lecker, einzig der Suppe hätte ein bisschen mehr Geschmack gut getan.
- The food was really good, only the soup could have benefited from a little more taste.
- Practice pronunciation – click once to start recording and again to stop
Neither of those is rare but especially the last phrasing does sound scripted and I don’t think people say it that often. You can of course use it if you want but what you really need to remember is that whenever you have a phrasing like
- the/my/your… only something
that’ll be
- der/die/das/mein… einzige ….
If you use nur in that case, that sounds really really wrong and I am not sure people would understand.
Why not? Well, because nur has never been an adjective. Not even close.
The meaning of “nur”
Nur has been a sentence…. sort of. It comes from ni waere which is (very) short for wenn nicht wäre and that translates to if there weren’t… let me give you an example. In an old Germanic village people sit around the fire, eating boar and drinking beer. Then, the brewer stands up and says
- “Wir haben kein Bier… (everybody goes like Huh?)… Ni wären die 10 Fass hier. (everyone is relieved).
- “We’ve got no more beer… if it wasn’t for those 10 barrels.
Obviously the old Germans didn’t bother all that much with word placement and agreement of subjunctive mode and that crap interesting grammar like that. This is how the phrase was used so the German nur was born form the idea of “if it wasn’t for that there wouldn’t be any”.
It became a fixed phrase, people used it a lot, and they got lazy about it, so the phrase was shortened. Much shortened. But it does make some sense… ni waere … I mean … endings get skipped all the time so we have niwaer, and if you fuse the i with an English version of w then you’re already at something that sounds like newer.
And from there to nur it’s not that far.
As the phrase shortened, the meaning broadened and today it does a lot that only also does. It can tell us that something is considered “not a lot”
- Wie soll ich das alles machen? Der Tag hat nur 24 Stunden.
- How am I supposed to do all that? The day only has 24 hours.
- Practice pronunciation – click once to start recording and again to stop
- “Kommst du?”
“Ja, ich will nur noch schnell eine Email schreiben.” - “Are you coming?”
“Yeah, I just want to write an email real quick.”
(here, it’s “not much” that we have to do) - Practice pronunciation – click once to start recording and again to stop
It can tell us that there is “not much variety”.
- Ich esse viel Pasta, aber nur Capellini.
- I eat a lot of pasta, but only angel hair.
- Practice pronunciation – click once to start recording and again to stop
It can express a condition, a requirement
- Nur, wenn du die richtigen Worte sagst, geht die Tür auf.
- Only if you say the right words will the door open.
- Practice pronunciation – click once to start recording and again to stop
- Ich mache den Abwasch nur für eine Massage.
- I’ll do the dishes only in exchange for a massage.
- Practice pronunciation – click once to start recording and again to stop
As we’re at it, the same sentence again with a “not much”-nur.
- Ich mache den Abwach für nur eine Massage.
- I’ll do the dishes for (just) one massage (only) .
- Practice pronunciation – click once to start recording and again to stop
So, if only is used as an adjective then it will be einzige but other than that nur is a fine translation… unless… well… and that brings us to erst.
The meaning of “erst”
The number one translation for erst is first but as similar as they may look, they are not related. First come from fore and that goes back to the overwhelmingly ancient Indo-European root *per… you might know it from prefixes like ver- or pro- or prepositions like für or for.
We can take forward or forth as a basic idea here, so first is essentially about being locally ahead of the pack.
Erst is originally the most-form what would later become the English word early. Early, earlier, earliest. Yep, that totally makes sense.
We’d have to take out something, but that was a lie anyway… … ahem…. … …. … I thought that was clever but anyway…
Erst comes from early and it is about being ahead of the pack in time.But I mean… time and space really go hand in hand… when you’re the winner of a marathon, you ahead of everyone else (first) and you arrive the earliest (erst).
All right.
So, just like einzige, erst started off as an adjective and it is still used that way.
- Die erste Frau.
- The first woman.
- Practice pronunciation – click once to start recording and again to stop
And, just like first, it is also used as .. uhm… let me think… uhm… an adverb of time… probably.
- Erst koche ich, dann esse ich.
- First I cook, then I eat.
- Practice pronunciation – click once to start recording and again to stop
But that’s not it. From there, erst broadened even further and became one of those hard to grasp word. It’s really hard to describe what it does in one sentence. But luckily we’ve already talked about erst in detail (I’ll add a link below) so we’ll just focus on the part that matters today:
Just like nur, erst can expresses that the speaker considers something “not much”but it talks about ongoing processes. Which makes sense, because erst used to be a time-word. Nur talks about what is there. Erst (as a translation for only) talks about what is there plus it expresses that the speaker thinks its “work in progress”.
Imagine you, your loved one and a few work colleagues are going out for a few drinks.
- Ich habe nur zwei Bier getrunken.
- I(‘ve) only had two beers.
- Practice pronunciation – click once to start recording and again to stop
- Ich habe erst zwei Bier getrunken.
- I’ve only had two beers (so far).
- Practice pronunciation – click once to start recording and again to stop
The first sentence works perfectly fine the next day.The second one would be appropriate if your loved wants to go home. Note that it DOESN’T necessarily imply that you will have more. You’ll probably give in and go home. The erst just expresses that you thought you were going to be there longer. It expresses that you think it’s “early” in an ongoing process. And that is lacking in nur.
- Ich war nur/ erst einmal in Paris.
- I’ve only been to Paris once (so far).
With nur, this is a simple counting. The erst doesn’t really express that I have plans to go there again. Maybe I really hated Paris. But it acknowledges that I am alive and that is an ongoing process. I mean, who knows, maybe I’ll have to go for job reasons.
- I had been learning German for only 2 months, so I couldn’t really talk all that much yet.
There is no so far here, but still there are enough hints. The had been learning instead of just learned , the context, and of course the yet… all those suggest that, I considered the learning at this particular time as ongoing. So it should be erst.
- Ich hatte erst seit zwei Monaten Deutsch gelernt, konnte also noch nicht wirklich viel sagen.
- Practice pronunciation – click once to start recording and again to stop
Nur wouldn’t be totally wrong because the whole thing is in past. But in the following example it would stick out quite a bit.
- Mein Sohn war erst 2, als er schon geschwollen daherreden konnte.
- My son was only 2 years old when he could already pontificate.
- Practice pronunciation – click once to start recording and again to stop
Why would nur stick out here? Well, we’re talking about age, and that is a “work in progress”. Living beings always age (except men, or course; we ripen). So the “ongoing-ness” of this verb (be some age) is so strong that the exact phrasing or context doesn’t matter. It’ll always be erst, and never nur.
Let’s do another example.
- I’ve only been in Berlin since Monday.
This is another example where nur would stick out as wrong. And the reason is since. Since clearly tells us that I haven’t left. No need for a so far or a yet. Since in this phrasing makes it clear that it’s ongoing.
- Ich bin erst seit Montag in Berlin.
- Practice pronunciation – click once to start recording and again to stop
All right. So this is erst. You need it whenever you want to express that you consider something ongoing or of something is kind of ongoing by default (like life). Using nur is understandable but people will definitely notice. Just keep in mind. Nur really only counts and deems it “not much”. Erst comes from early and brings in a time-component…. like a preliminary result. Sometimes, we can add that component by using extra words, by the way. For instance in the beer-example.
- Ich hatte bis jetzt nur zwei Bier.
- I’ve only had two beers so far.
- Practice pronunciation – click once to start recording and again to stop
This is perfectly fine and communicates the same as erst would. But this only works for “countable” things…. like beers, or times in Paris. It would sound wrong with age, for instance.
All right. We’re almost done here, but there is one more use of erst that doesn’t really fit in with what we’ve learned so far.
- only then.
This can be either… erst dann or nur dann but there is a difference.
- You need to do this, this and finally this, only then the door will open.
If you use nur here, you’re expressing that the door will only open IF you’ve done all this.
If you use erst, you’re saying that the door will only open AFTER you’ve done all this. Just think “earliest then”. Nur is about condition, erst is about time.
So … what would we need here?
- You need this, this and this. Only then the door will open.
We need nur because we’re just listing items. There is no time involved.
But enough with the boring nuances that no one can remember. This is it for today. This was our What is the Difference-Special for the German words for only. We could just say it’ll be nur except when either:
- the phrasing is similar to “The only blah” – then it’ll be einzige in German
- or we are talking about a work in progress and there might be more to come – then it’ll be erst
And now is the perfect time for an exercise.
- There is only one sentence in this exercise.
The exercise has exercised a lot. That’s why it is so little.
And with that unfunny pun, we’re done. Yay! Voll gut!
Go ahead and try your own example with the words in the comments. And of course if you’ve questions or suggestions, just let your hand know to let the computer know to let the router know to let my server know to let me know :).
I hope you liked it and bis nächstes Mal.
Oh, if you want to recap and test yourself about this, I have made a quiz lesson too. You can find it here.
Further reading:

> It can tell us that there is there is “not much variety”.
The second “there is” is just a typo?
> But luckily we’ve already talked about erst in detail (I’ll add a link below)
Was the link added? I don’t see it (maybe I’m looking in wrong places?)
> der/die/das/mein… einzige ….
but the example with Essen/Suppe used “einzig”, without -e. What’s the rule there?
> The ig-ending usually makes an adjective out of something and add a sense of “like”
Does -eln also has some meaning? I seem to confuse einzig and einzeln, maybe that would help me keep them separate :-)
Yeah there was a “there is” too many :)
The link was indeed missing, added it now and here it is for convenience:
https://yourdailygerman.com/erst-meaning/
Sorry for that, I sometimes forget that I said this when I reach the end of an article.
“einzig” is an adverb, “einzige-” is an adjective.
– Only the tree knows this. (adverb)
– Einzig/Nur [der Baum] weiss das.
– [The only tree] that knows this. (adjective)
– [Der einzige Baum], der das weiss.
“einzeln”.. single. Not in a group or pair.
– Ich habe eine einzelne Nudel im Bett gefunden.
– I found a single noodle (it was lonely) in the bed.
– Ich habe eine einzige Nudel im Bett gefunden.
– I found only one noodle in the bed. (not more than one)
Let me know if that helps :)
> “einzig” is an adverb, “einzige-” is an adjective.
Yes, I got that. I was rather asking specifically about this expression:
Das Essen war echt lecker, einzig der Suppe hätte ein bisschen mehr Geschmack gut getan.
Here “einzig” is an adverb (I presume) but then the text says, that when this kind of expression is used then it is:
der/die/das/mein… einzige ….
so now it is an adjective. Does it mean that both are possible? What would be an example of such expression with “einzige”?
> “einzeln”.. single. Not in a group or pair.
Yes, I know the meaning of both words. What I meant was that they are so similar to me, that it takes a second to decide which meaning is which word. I get that sometimes in English with “then” and “than” :-) (or, again in German, with “einigen” and “eignen”)
But I guess I can use “doppel” to help me with that. It has -el ending and means “double”, so maybe it will help me to anchor the meaning of “einzeln” as single/individual. We’ll see :-)
So there are two structures basically:
– der/die/das/ein/mein/… + einzige(-) + noun
Here, it’s an adjective and means “only” as in the/a/my/your only noun
The example with the soup uses einzig as an adverb synonym for nur. It has NOTHING to do with any noun.
The example is
– … einzig der Suppe…
but it could also be:
– einzig im Sommer (only in summer)
You do NOT need to use this version of einzig, stick with nur here.
You need the adjective einzige.
As for einzeln vs einzige.
einzeln is talking about a manner – one at a time
einzige is talking about an amoun – ONLY one
Hope that helps.
“Turn off” your phones, not “of”.
“Of” is a possesive prepostion – English analog of “von”. Its usage is inevitable in the language that has no verb declination.
Fixed, thanks!
Hi Emmanuel!
I just wanted to chime in and say that, whenever I have a question about German, your blog is always there to answer it.
To be honest, I find it rather astonishing how comprehensive it is!
Thanks for your effort, help, and writing!
-Avishay
It’s taken a while to build it :). But gladly language doesn’t change that fast. Thanks for the great feedback!
I was watching YouTube and I saw this title “Was ist nur falsch mit diesem Mario Maker Level?”. I checked the translation and it said “What’s wrong with this Mario Maker Level?”. It means that nur can also be used to emphasize an adjective? is it possible to get rid of that “nur”? Thanks in advance.
Nice question!!
The “nur” here is for color. The factual question doesn’t change if you take it out, but it adds the idea of “What on earth??”
A vibe of disbelief.
Hope that helps :)
Thank you so much!!!!
1) Will, Simply put. For “nur” and “Einzige”
Is the difference between
Only the boys
The boys only ( the only here is not necessarily “nur” ),but this is a simply summary : not a guide.
“Ich habe erst zwei Bier gertunken”, I think this depends
John : Hör auf zu trinken.
LiLy : Ich habe erst zwei Bier gertunken ( I wanna drink more).
The context of party would fit your usage up.
The two sentences you gave about the boys are both with “nur” in German. “einzig-” is used if “only” is between “the” and the noun.
I meant that “einzige” seems to have subset element to it ” the only boys who…”
“’Wir haben kein Bier… (everybody goes like Huh?)… Ni wären die 10 Fass hier. (everyone is relieved).
“We’ve got no more beer… if it wasn’t for those 10 barrels.'”
Girrrrl,
“ni wären” = “if it ***weren’t*** for those 10 barrels.”
Noch ein toller Artikel. Das hiflt mir sehr, was diese 3 Wörter voneinander unterschiedet, zu verstehen.
First time writing a German comment here, please correct me :)
It would be more idiomatic to move the “was”-sentence to the end.
– Das hilft mir sehr zu verstehen, was diese 3 Wörter voneinander unterscheidet.
Aber sonst perfekt :)
Only if you say the right words the door will open. This sounds strange, wouldn’t it be better if it were the other way around? Only if you say the right words will the door open. The inversion makes it ok for the verb to come first. Another option would be: If you say the right words the door will open. But in this second case, it loses that mandatory “feel”.
Hah… the version with the “will” first is actually closer to the German structure. Good to know. Another one of those millions of English subtleties :) Danke
Danke!
Ich habe noch eine Frage…
Wenn ich sagen will “I’ve only been in Vienna 3 weeks”, mit der Betonung, dass ich hier neu bin, ist es – Ich bin erst seit drei Wochen in Wien? (weil ich noch in Wien wohne..)
I’ve been saying the above using “nur” (and reading your awesome blog, I think now I’ve been saying that wrong) but noone’s been correcting me…too nice maybe?!
Ja, definitiv “erst”… wenn du “nur” sagst, dann könnte man verstehen, dass du nur Urlaub machst. Oder, wenn der Kontext dagegen spricht, dann war es halt ein Fehler :)
Quick question regarding the sentence “Das Essen war echt lecker, einzig der Suppe hätte ein bisschen mehr Geschmack gut getan”.
Why is die Suppe “der”?
Is it Dativ because you’re thinking about adding some more flavour to the soup and hence it’s having something “done” to it to make it dative in grammar?
I was kind of expecting that question actually :)… your idea was exactly right… let’s “normalize” it…
– EIn bisschen mehr Geschmack (subject) tut (Verb) der Suppe (dative object) gut (rest of verb).
The infinitive is “gut tun” and as you said, you do that TO someone.
The “Suppe” comes first in that sentence to mirror the order of things in the preceding one… both sentences are statements about food and they start with that food.
– Das Essen war…
– Der Suppe hätte…
If the second sentence were to start with “Ein bisschen Geschmack” it would sound disjointed… like… how do we get from “really good” to “a little taste was missing. You can do the same in English… just with different grammaruca roles
– The food was really good. Only the soup lacked some taste.
– The food was really good. Some taste was lacking only from the soup.
The first one sounds better… at least to my ears.
Wann benutz man “bloß”? oder gibt es einen großen Unterschied?
There is some overlap with “nur” but there are also differences…. “Bloß” is in the works already and I hope it’s done soon (stupid interns… can’t ever keep a deadline ;)
Bloß is more or less mere(ly). Can be used both as an adverb and an adjective.
Ich frage mich, wie verbreitet die “zu”-haltigen Adjektive sind (z.B. “auszubildend*”). Wäre es verständlich wenn ich so vorginge:
Dieser Kram muss weggeworfen werden. ->
Dieser Kram ist wegzuwerfen. ->
Dieser wegzuwerfende Kram. ->
Etwas Wegzuwerfendes.
Macht das keinen Sinn?
Doch doch, Sinn macht das alles und jeder würde das verstehen. Aber es ist nix für die gesprochene Sprache… es gibt ein paar Wendungen, die öfter verwendet werden aber von denen mal abgesehen, sind die Formulierungen nicht besonders schön… sehr trocken und durch diese “ist zu machen”- Grundlage etwas herrisch… also…beim Schreiben ja, beim Sprechen lieber nicht.
OK, noch ne Frage.
Es gibt 2 Verben, die gleich geschrieben werden, haben aber entgegengesetzte Bedeutungen: erschrecken (ich erschreckte jmd), erschrecken (ich erschrack). Das ist ein kausatives Paar (wie fallen/fällen, sitzen/setzen, schwimmen/schwemmen usw.), und wie es für solche Paare üblich ist, ist das eine Verb stark und das andere schwach. Deswegen entsteht folgende Situation: man kann theoretisch sowohl “ich bin erschrocken” (Perfekt), als auch “ich bin erschreckt” (= “ich bin [von jmd] erschreckt”, also Zustandspassiv) sagen. Die Frage ist dann: wird die zweite Variante als richtig erkannt, oder als falsche Form der ersten Variante empfunden?
Schwer zu sagen, der Sinn ist ja der gleiche und es gibt immer einen Agens, auf eine Art… ich würde es wahrscheinlich nicht merken und es als Adjektiv verstehen… also ohne große “Passivheit”. Sprich, es klingt fr mich wie eine Variation der ersten…. und die ist mit 22.000 Treffern bei Google nicht so selten (die richtige hat allerdings 10 mal soviel)…
Ich habe nur eine Frage aber erst möchte ich mich bei dir für diesen großartigen Artikel bedanken!
Das Einzige, was mir noch nicht ganz klar ist, ist, ob die Vögel, die am Zweig droben auf der rechten Seite stehen, was besonderes andeuten. Deinem Blog folge ich erst seit ein paar Monaten, und wenn ich mich nicht irre, waren diese Vögel früher nur schwarz-weiß.
:p
Sie waren ja damals gefroren.
Ne, die wohnen da einfach nur :D
Vielen Dank! This was super helpful.
Ist das Käsekuchen?
Vielleicht!
Ach ja, dein heutiges Bild hat mich daran erinnert:
https://pbfcomics.com/253/
Hallo,
Sind diese Sätze richtig?
1.) Es gibt nur einen Satz in dieser Übung.
2.) Es gibt erst einen Satz in dieser Übung. (implying there are more sentences yet to come.)
Ich bin erst ein Anfänger und ich shätze Ihre Hilfe!
(I am a beginner and I appreciate your help!)
Erst kann ich nur sagen, dass ich Ihnen für Ihre Hilfe danke.
(First, I can only say, that I thank you for your help.)
Are these sentences correct?
Vielen Dank!!
They are all perfect :)… okay almost. The last one is a little odd. The “erst” in combination with “können” makes it sounds like “at first I am only able to say…” implying that you’ll “learn” how to say more later on…. don’t know if it makes sense why it doesn’t work :). I think in German the phrasing would be either with “können” or with a “first” word… hier ein paar Beispiele
– Zunächst will ich sagen, …
– Zuerst lass mich sagen,…
“Erst” alone wouldn’t be used unless you want to “squeeze” this part before whatever it is you actually want to say…like here:
– Ich habe ein paar Fragen aber erst muss ich mal sagen,…
Hope that made sense :)
Alles klar…Thank you very much for taking the time to respond and help!
Vielen dank für dein einsigartigen Artikel . Yetz verstehe ich besser Unterschied zwischen ertz und nur ;
Freut mich zu hören :)
Can it be „Es gibt nur ein Satz in dieser Übung“?
„…nur einziges“ doesn’t seem as common. :-)
It can :)… “einzige” would not be proper because then the original would be:
– Es gibt nur einen *einzigen Satz in dieser Übung.
– There is only one *single sentence in this exercise.
Now we just need to decide whether “erst” would be possible too ;)… hint: I can edit the posts at any time.
Also: In diesem Artikel gab es nur ein Wort. Ich denke, dass das richtig wäre, weil der Artikel schon gemacht worden ist und man sollte nicht damit rechnen, mehr Worte zu sehen.
Aber ich würde sagen: Ich habe erst ein Wort gelesen. Das heißt, es ist möglich, dass ich mehr Worte lesen werde.
Genau :)