The meaning of “werden”

Hello everyone,

and welcome to our German word of the Day. Summer is over. Finally!
It is autumn. Or as I liked to call it Awesumn.
Because I love it.
Days are becoming shorter and it is getting cold and rainy. Which is great by itself already, but there’s another great aspect of autumn, captured perfectly in the poem “Autumn” by Goethe**:

Colds will be caught,
Jackets will be worn,
Sheep will be shorn.
German will be taught.

(**might not actually be by Goethe)

Fall is awesome and it is the season in which we tackle the BIG things.
No more humpdy dumpty like in summer.
Fall is the time to step up the game.
It’s simple math: fall + game = stepped up.
And for my enginneeer out there: f ( fall ) = stepped up (game).
And for my computer science people out there:
if (season==fall)
{while (game<stepped_up)
{game++;}
}

Yeah… if you’re new here on this site, you’re probably pretty confused now.
But the explanations are usually pretty good.
And today, we’ll talk about something that really could use a good explanation.
We’ll take a look at the meanings and functions of

werden

And there’s actually three of them. First of, werden is the German word for to become.
But it’s also used as a helper to build the future tense. And as if that wasn’t enough, it’s also used to build the passive voice.
In this article, we’ll of course look at the grammar a bit. But our main focus will be exploring WHY German uses werden for those three things.

Like… why does it mean to become and what happened to the German bekommen?
Why does German use werden for future?
And why do we use it for passive when so many other languages use to be?

So… are you ready to dive in? Then let’s go!

Get My Newsletter

I'll send an email whenever I post a new lesson (once per week usually).

werden, bekommen and become

So, we already mentioned, that werden is the German word for to become.
And for many learners, that raises the question, what about bekommen?
So let’s talk about that first.

Obviously, become and bekommen are brothers. But the translation of bekommen is to receive. Something clearly went wrong there. I mean, the translations clearly have nothing to do with one another.
Or do they?
When we look a little closer, we’ll find that the idea of receiving and the one of becoming are actually that crazy a pair. In fact, English has a word that expresses both: to get.

  • I got an e-mail…. you receive something
  • I got tired…. you become tired.

What those two share is an underlying notion of reaching. The only difference is the direction. The email reaches you.. you receive it. You reach the state of tired.. then you become. But in both instances, you and something move “toward” each other until you “meet”.
Back in the old Indo-European language, this phenomenon of bidirectional verbs was quite common. And there are still some verbs like this around. We already mentioned to get, which can mean to obtain, but also to become and even to reach places (get home). But there’s also to make. You can make a salad or you can make a bus. Same sentence structure, just a different object. And boom, the meanings are completely different. When you make a salad, you “bring” the salad toward you. When you make the bus, you move toward the bus.
Now, the ancestor of to become/bekommen is the Germanic *bikweman, and that used to be bidirectional verbs, too. But then, this happened…

“Fellow English men, we have this word bikweman
and it means two things… that is confusing. Let’s pick one.”

“Yay!”
“Which one should we pick then.”
“We have to get for to receive..”
To get kicks ASS… best word ever.”
“But we also have weorðan for the other mea…”
“Whatever. weorðan sucks anyway. Let’s use bikweman instead.”
“Okay…so from now on bikweman shall be our new word
for
weorðan.”
“I have a question… can we use to get for that too? Pleeeaase???”
“Uhg… fine.”

Shortly after that, in Germany…

“Fellow Germans. We have this bikweman and it means two
things. Brits just picked one. Let’s pick one, too.”

“Jaaaa.”
Brits picked to become. Should we do the same?”
“No way! We’ll look like weak copycats!!
“And we have werden and werden is awesome… best word ever. WE can NOT replace that.”
“So, the from now on we shall use bekommen only for to receive.”

“Hooray!

Well… not really sure if that’s how it went down. I wasn’t there at the time because I was on vacation.
Anyway, so both languages used their version of to become for different things, and to us now they seem completely different.
And while English git rid of its version of werden, German kept it and uses it as to become to this day.
Time for examples.

  • Wie kann ich in wenigen Tagen fließend werden?
  • How can I become fluent in just a matter of days?
    (the answer: you can’t unless you’re a snowman)
  • Practice pronunciation – click once to start recording and again to stop

  • Maria erklärt, warum sie Vegetarierin wurde.
  • Maria explains why she became a vegetarian.
  • Practice pronunciation – click once to start recording and again to stop

  • Thomas wird immer arroganter.
  • Thomas becomes more and more arrogant.
  • Practice pronunciation – click once to start recording and again to stop

Now, English actually has a whole bunch of words for the idea of development. But they are all translated with werden.

  • Maria wird müde.
  • Maria is getting tired.
  • Practice pronunciation – click once to start recording and again to stop

  • Sarah wird diesen November 24.
  • Sarah becomes/turns 24 this November.
  • Practice pronunciation – click once to start recording and again to stop

  • Man, bist du groß geworden.
  • Man, you’ve grown tall.
  • Practice pronunciation – click once to start recording and again to stop

  • Thomas is going crazy.
  • Thomas wird verrückt.
  • Practice pronunciation – click once to start recording and again to stop

So, whenever the core is self development or changing from one state to another statewerden is probably the word you need because the concept is the very core of that verb. But where did it actually get that idea? Where does the verb actually come from?
Well, let’s find out. Because that’ll be the key to the other uses of the verb.

The origin of “werden”

Werden comes from the implausably ancient Indo-European a root that meant to turn, to wind. Looks like a rather specific activity… but man oh man… there are a LOT of words coming from that root.
Here are some examples from English…

  • vortex, vertical, warp, versus,
    worth,
    ergonomic or worm

and in German…

  • Wert (worth, value), werfen (throw),
    werden
    ,
    Werft (shipyard) and many many more…

What does werden have to do with turning then?
Well, it is actually not that big of a distance. If you want to become something you kind of have to turn/bend your life in that direction. In fact, the verb to turn is actually often used in a sense of evolving.

  • In fall the leaves turn red and yellow.

We could also use to become here. To turn is used with that exact meaning. And that is exactly what happened with werden. The only difference is that werden lost all connection to bending and turning while to turn still has it.

Cool.
So now that we know what werden means and where it comes from, let’s look at its other two function and see if those uses actually make sense.

“werden – Why its used for the future

In English, there are a couple of ways to express that something is in the future. But the main one is using the verb will. German, especially in spoken, doesn’t always bother with the future, but when it does, then it uses werden.

  • Ich werde morgen ins Ballet gehen… Spaß, natürlich nicht.
  • I will go to a ballet tomorrow… kidding, of course not.
  • Practice pronunciation – click once to start recording and again to stop

  • Ich frage mich ob die Menschen in der Zukunft mal auf dem Mars leben werden.
  • I ask myself whether people will be living on Mars in the future.
  • Practice pronunciation – click once to start recording and again to stop

Now, that’s kind of weird. German and English are really close when it comes to helper verbs usually. So why would they use different words to build the future, to begin with? The answer to that is that …oh wait… Steve, my producer, wants something… … … what?… I….. I don’t understand, what do you mean “out of time?!”… … but… but… I can’t just stop here. We just started intensive-season man! How intensive is it to just stop right when we got going… ….. oh… … … oh yeah? well tell the network executives to go hang themselves off a cliff if that is so cool… … … … fine.

So guys… as it seems we have to stop here, because the network thinks the show is “too long”. I know it sucks but so does Kanye West.
That didn’t even make sense.
So… if you have any questions about werden so far or you want to complain about the sudden stop, just leave me a comment. I hope you liked it and see you next time.

If you’re curious you continue with part two right away here:

.

4.8 34 votes
Article Rating
Emanuel

Emanuel Creator & Author

World's best teacher of German words and grammar. Full Bio →

German GrammarVocabulary • Etymology

Get My Newsletter

I'll send an email whenever I post a new lesson (once per week usually).

Your Comments and Questions

guest

49 Comments
Newest
Oldest

btarduno
btarduno

I’m glad I got 7/7 responses correct, however I noticed it didn’t give me the explanations after each answer. Maybe it’s because I got them correct- the site didn’t feel I needed a response to explain. :-)

Emanuel
Admin
Emanuel
Reply to  btarduno

No, this is just an older quiz where I didn’t use this method of feedback on the answers yet.

Hajarfaried
Hajarfaried

Guten Morgen
“Für all jene, die das Leben verstehen, würde das viel richtiger klingen.”
Is this “würde” an equivalent to would?

Hajarfaried
Hajarfaried
Reply to  Emanuel

Danke

Hajarfaried
Hajarfaried

“Wie kann ich in wenigen Tagen fließend werden?
(not the most idiomatic German sentence ever)”
What would you change about it?

Also, you used “I ask myself” as a translation for “Ich frage mich ob..”. Would “I wonder whether..” be more suitable here?

Hajarfaried
Hajarfaried
Reply to  Emanuel

Danke!
A while back I found “to wonder” as a translation for “sich fragen”. I looked it up, even though I know what it literally means, because I found this combination a little weird. That’s why I commented about it :)

mikehinton
mikehinton
Reply to  Hajarfaried

I went to an automatic teller to get cash but the teller indicated my account was empty. Since it’s an unforgiving machine, I mentally asked myself, “How can this be? My wife perhaps?” To wonder is “to think about things in a questioning and sometimes doubting way.”

Harvey Wachtel
Harvey Wachtel

That “Goethe” verse is insufficiently German in its soul. For a true appreciation of Autumn, find Klaus Groth’s “Ernst ist der Herbst” and Brahms’s gorgeous setting of it, “Im Herbst”.

On that somber note, I appreciated the possibly unintended depth of your “on vacation” joke. It reminded me of Mark Twain’s remark, “I do not fear death. I had been dead for billions and billions of years before I was born, and had not suffered the slightest inconvenience from it.”

Foysal sheikh
Foysal sheikh

Thanks

jordan s
jordan s

Super job – thank you!

Foysal sheikh
Foysal sheikh
Reply to  jordan s

Thanks

pietrodmk
pietrodmk

Hi, Emmanuel, the article is great as always, but I got confused with the etymology part…
I couldn’t grasp the relation between “weave” and the “werden”-family. I’ll explain why, but It’ possible that I just misunderstood those paragraphs, so please tell me if it is so.
Since you didn’t mention “weave” among the words derived from the common PIE root, I was trying to understand how it fitted as a related word to “werden”. I mean, with a little mind bending I can understand that when one weaves, one “turns” the threads within each other. But to be sure I went to the only (sadly, only) source I know for Germanic etymology, which is Wiktionary – which I know is not 100% secure, and this is why I’m asking. It says there that the root for “weave” is PIE “webh” (meaning exactly “to weave, to braid”), while the root for “werden” is PIE “wert” (meaning “to turn”). I’ll add the links below. So, according to Wiktionary, they would be different roots… but they are still very similar words for me, “webh” and “wert”. Please keep in mind that I’m doubting Wiktionary, not you, at this point. Could you enlighten this matter a bit? In your research, did you find a common root for “webh” and “wert”, or “weave” and wert-derived words?

Thanks a lot! Your blog is a blessing for my German studies.

weave: https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/weave#Etymology_1
webh: https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/webʰ-
werden: https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/werden#Etymology
werþaną: https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Reconstruction:Proto-Germanic/werþaną#Etymology
wert: https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/wert-

EM C
EM C

Hi Emanuel, can you please kindly explain the Unterschied between “werden” and “werden zu”? That´s really confusing! Im voraus vielen Dank!

Roger
Roger

Hi –

Ein weiteres interessantes Thema. Danke für das Teilen.

Es scheint, dass “bekommen” auch die Vorstellung haben kann, „to get something done“?

Zum Beispiel im folgenden Satz:

Andere wurden jedoch sehr sparsam erzogen und werden Probleme haben, den Krug leer zu bekommen. Deshalb gibt es die Regel, dass der Krug leer sein muss.

Wenn dies zutrifft, ist diese Konstruktion die bevorzugte Ausdrucksweise, um “etwas zu bekommen” auszudrücken.

Vielen Dank!!

Pax
Pax

Hallo, Emmanuel.
Meine Frage betrifft nicht das Hauptthema, sondern einen Beispielsatz und zwar: “Maria erklärt, warum sie Vegetarierin wurde.”
Nach meinem Verständniss (oder nach dem, was jeder Deutschlehrer sagt) braucht man vor “Vegetarierin” einen Artikel. Neulich habe ich jedoch einen ähnlichen Satz gehört (“Er ist Gast hier”), also auch ohne Artikel. Deshalb meine Frage: Was mit der eisernen Regel, dass man vor zälbaren Nomen einen Artikel braucht? Gibt es mindestens eine Daumenregel, die lässt beim Sprechen auf den Artikel verzichten?

erina
erina

Hello, i have below two sentences and want to know the difference between the two. Which one is correct when and when its used ?

Ich wurde Arztin. und Ich bin arztin geworden.

Nabil
Nabil

Hello there, just asking if there is a meaning for the structure ,, werde gesollt,, and the structure ,, werde sollen,,

Soooooo thankful to you.

hybrid00eyes
hybrid00eyes

Great explanation. Loved the imaginary dialog!

Anonymous
Anonymous

Can you please simplify this, without all the stories at the beginning? Just present the structures, and let’s get on with it!

berlingrabers
berlingrabers

Yeah, I think “go/went” and “be/was” are the only examples in English. I learned about “went” in Greek class – there are a few more of those in Greek (at least New Testament Koine Greek). The verb for “carry” is “phero” but its past (aorist, if that means anything to you) form is “ēnengka,” obviously from another older verb.

I guess that “get” in Genesis probably is basically “receive/acquire,” though as I recall the verb it translates (“qanah,” presented as the etymology for the son’s name, Cain or in Hebrew “Qayin”) can either mean “get” in that normal sense, usually applied to livestock or slaves, or “create” (some more contemporary translations reflect the latter meaning). Luther translated it with “gewinnen.” But then there’s also “beget” with the reproductive meaning…

berlingrabers
berlingrabers

There’s also English “worship,” which didn’t originally mean “anbeten/Anbetung” but was a noun meaning “honor/dignity/renown.” That’s why some officials still have “worshipful” or “Your Worship” as titles; classically it just meant “honorable.” I guess the “wer-/were-” in “werewolf” comes from that “turn” root too? And “weird.” Would make sense.

Apparently “went” as past tense for “go” actually came from “wenden”/”wend”; somehow “go” poached the past tense from “wend,” which still exists, usually to describe a river (“The Mississippi wends its way through the heart of the North American continent…”) but now, I’m fairly sure, has “wended” as its past form.

Also, yet another fun use for “get” can be found in Genesis (1. Mose) 4:1 in the good ol’ King James translation. (Hope my HTML works right…)

“Get” really is the best verb of all the verbs.

André Rhine-Davis
André Rhine-Davis

“Sarah wird diesen November 24.”
Is “diesen November” in the accusative case? That’s the only way I can see it fitting with “diesen”, but I don’t see how that makes any sense :S

Also, as a noun and adjective, Old English “weorþ” does still exist, as English “worth” (c.f. German Wert/wert). The verb “weorðan” survived into Middle English as “to worth”, and although it is effectively dead and gone now, there are still some archaic frozen phrases that apparently still exist (although I’ve never personally heard anyone say them) such as “Woe worth the day” (with “worth” in the present subjunctive and “the day” in the dative) i.e. “may woe happen to the day”.

“For, adds our erudite Friend, the Saxon weorthan equivalent to the German werden, means to grow, to become; traces of which old vocable are still found in the North-country dialects, as, ‘What is word of him?’ meaning ‘What is become of him?’ and the like. Nay we in modern English still say, ‘Woe worth the hour.’ {Woe befall the hour}”
– Thomas Carlyle, “Past and Present” (1843)

Adriano Marcato
Adriano Marcato

I don’t know if the exposed chronology is right, but if “werden” came to be used for future, what would they use before? something like “will” or maybe the portuguese future conjugation?

Adriano Marcato
Adriano Marcato

ok, it was already answered in part 2, sorry

iyz
iyz

hi
stimme means voice or sound
and the be- prefix with a verb means to inflict something on another something
so bestimmen means to inflict sound on something as I understood from your be- article
how on earth could bestimmen means to accertain or to be right as in ( Das bestimmt= That’s right)
please explain
and thanks in advance

Andrew
Andrew

Hi Emanuel,

I was just wondering if you knew why the conjugation of werden changed from the more regular “werden wirst ward geworfen”, like the verbs helfen and werfen, to changing the simple past to “wurde” which is irregular? I thought it was interesting cos people seem to like to form verbs by analogy to other verbs (like when people use bring brang and brung in English). :)

Andrew
Andrew
Reply to  Emanuel

That makes a lot of sense to me, and it’s interesting the way Icelandic kept the archaic declination patterns. Ich fand den Schreibstil des Antwortenden nebenbei sehr wortgewandt, seine Sprache hat so eine Genauigkeit, die nett zu lesen war. Das ist was ich am meisten an Deutsch mag, glaube ich :) Das Wort “wurde” war also vielleicht wirklich eine Anologie, aber zu Hilfsverben und nicht dem Ablautmuster. Irgendwie wie das Wort “Antwort” weiblich ist obwohl “Wort” sächlich ist. Ich dachte vielleicht das liegt daran, dass die meisten Nomen, die mit einem T enden und aus Verben geformt sind, weiblich sind. Aber ich weiß nicht ob das wahr ist oder nicht, aber es ergibt Sinn möglicherweise :)

Danke für die Antwort :)