
Hello everyone,
and welcome to our German Word of the Day. And this time, we’ll take a look at the meaning of one of your least favorite words…
hin
Hin is really confusing for a lot of learners and even advanced speakers often make mistakes with it. Or better, without it. Like here…
- Ich bin da gegangen.
This is wrong, it should be:
- Ich bin da hingegangen.
- Practice pronunciation – click once to start recording and again to stop
Forgetting hin is a really really common, I’m sure many of you have made it. And even though you’ll still be understood, a missing hin sounds quite bad and really really ruins your language swag. Kind of like this:
- I drinks a beer.
It’s just a letter, it’s understandable, but it sounds like I am an A2 student.
Today, we’ll take a thorough look at hin and see what it does and why it sounds so bad if you forget it. And we’ll talk about its weird nature and how it can’t quite decide whether it wants to be a prefix or not.
Here are the links to the sections so you can hop around (but I’d say you shouldn’t).
- German’s OCD about Space
- The Core Idea of “hin”
- “hin” – the indication of #destination
- “hin” – generic destination
And now let’s jump right in.
The purpose of language is ultimately to convey information – of any kind. Be it facts, opinions or feelings. There’s an unlimited amount of information to choose from and for the most part, what we say depends on what we … well… want to express. But to an extent, it also depends on the language we’re using. Because each language has a different focus on certain aspects of reality.
Arabic for instance finds it really important to make a grammatical distinction between “you two” and “you many”.
Japanese and other Asian languages abound with information about the status of the speakers in relation to each other.
Many of the Slavic languages really care about whether an action is brought to an end (perfektive) or not and English, while generally quite easy going, does care about whether something is ongoing or not.
And German?
Many of you are probably now silently screaming “gender”. And yes… German does care what grammatical gender a freaking chair has.
But besides that, there’s another area where German cares a great deal to be precise.
And that is … location.
German’s OCD about Space
Courses and textbooks usually don’t talk about that, because it’s not generally considered “a thing”, but German actually makes a big effort to be precise and explicit about spatial relations. All those prepositions, the two way prepositions, hin and her… all these are symptoms of German really caring about being precise in that area.
And there’s one aspect in particular that German really is kind of OCD about and that is… OCD!
The distinction between origin, current location and destination.
Well, actually it’s mainly the distinction between current location and destination, but then it wouldn’t be OCD.
Anyway, let’s look at an example in English:
- I am coming from the market.
- I am at the market.
- I am going to the market.
Obviously, English also expresses that by using prepositions. But in comparison with German, English (and many other languages) are pretty chill. In particular, they don’t bother with the distinction between destination and current location.
- I am there.
- I am going there.
English leaves this up to Captain Context and he does a pretty fine job.
German on the other hand can’t help it but to make it explicit, resulting not only in it being super clear, but also in a massive headache for learners because they have to deal with seemingly pointless bits of grammar.
One tool German uses for that are the so called two-way prepositions.
Just in case you don’t know what those are, here’s a fictional example with a fictional character…
- Thomas kotzt unter dem Tisch.
- Thomas kotzt unter den Tisch.
Both sentence translate to “Thomas vomits under the table.”. But the Dative in the first one marks “under the table” as a fixed location, where the vomiting takes place while the Accusative in the second one marks “under the table” as the destination of the vomit. This is gross, by the way. I really need to have a talk with my peons… erm… I mean interns.
Anyway, so yeah… these two-way prepositions are one way for German to make clear whether or not something is a destination.
And another important tool is hin.
The core idea of “hin”
Hin is a cousin of her and hier and together they form a trinity that is kind of similar to the OCD one we just learned about.
her – hier – hin
Hier is the stationary here, the current location of the speaker.
Her expresses a very general idea of toward the current location/speaker, while hin expresses the very broad notion of outward, toward another location.
Here’s an example
- Ich jogge immer her. (I always run here.)
- Ich jogge immer hier. (I always run here.)
- Ich jogge immer hin. (I always run there.)
The first sentence says that I’m jogging to here, the second sentences says that here is where I do my running, and the last one expresses that I run to there from here. As you can see in the translations, English doesn’t mark these things. The first two sentences are the same and we’d need context to tell what they mean. And the last sentence could also mean that I do my running there.
In German, it’s clearly marked whether we’re in one location (hier) or not (her, hin) and where the new location is.
Now, technically her and hin both express directed motion. But her has this vibe of inward, toward the speaker and in essence it’s only referring to one location: here. Sure, “here” can be anywhere but in any situation there’s just one of it.
Hin on the other hand with its notion of outward, away from the current location can refer to any location other than here. So it’s much more general. And that’s basically its core function:
Hin is used to establish a generic destination that is not “here”.
And that makes it a very useful word because we’ve learned just how important this is for our favorite language (German, I mean German).
Now, hin can be used in two slightly distinct ways. The first one is as a sort of destination-tag.
“hin” – indicating a #destination
Take this sentence:
- I’m going there twice a week.
When people want to say this in German, a LOT of times they say
- Ich gehe zweimal pro Woche da.
All the words are translated correctly. And yet, it’s wrong. And with what we’ve learned about German’s OCD, we can understand why.
You see, the German word da is a metaphorical pointer to a location. Just like there. The problem is that it can only answer at the question “at what place”.
The sentence, however, is obviously about me going to some place. So the location is in fact a destination and giving an answer to the question “to what place“.
You’re probably like “Okay… so what.”
And English is like “Yeah, whatever, it’s fine.”
But German REALLY flips its shit.
“WHAT?! You’re trying to answer to what place with an element that answers at what place?!?! OMG, this is outrageous! I … I’m out of words.”
And that’s what we need hin for.
- Ich gehe zweimal pro Woche da hin.
- Practice pronunciation – click once to start recording and again to stop
Hin is basically like a hashtag #destination that’s added to the static location da.
Here’s another example.
- Ich lege das Buch hier hin.
- I’ll put the book here.
Ich lege das Buch hier… NOPE!- Practice pronunciation – click once to start recording and again to stop
Again, the sentence involves a destination. But hier by itself only indicates a fixed location. The directional part is missing and we can add that by using our little tag hin.
Now you might think like “Ah okay… so I’ll add hin whenever there’s a destination.”
But not so fast, young Jedi. Work that will not.
Take this sentence:
- I’m going to the gym five times per week.
It’s the same as the one above, only that I’m serious about my fitness goals this time around, and there’s this really hot Pilates trainer there. She is so freaking gorgeous it’s unreal. Makes me get off topic if I even think about her. Where was I… oh yeah… hin.
So yeah, the other difference in the example is that we now replaced the generic da/there with an actual location (the gym).
Now what would you say… which of the following translations is considered correct, or at least idiomatic. Number one, number two or both?
- Ich gehe fünf mal pro Woche ins Fitnessstudio.
- Ich gehe fünf mal pro Woche ins Fitnessstudio hin.
The answer is… only number one is considered correct.
Why?
Well, for one thing, the location is already unambiguously marked as a destination by the preposition (and case) we’re using.
- to the gym
- ins Fitnessstudio
Those two phrases are clearly destinations, they answer the question “to what place” , so there’s no need for an extra marking.
But the bigger problem, the thing that makes it sound really weird to add hin to that is the fact that hin isn’t only a tag – it can actually be a destination itself.
hin – the generic destination
Take the following sentence:
- I’m putting the book.
This sounds wrong, right?
The reason is that to put involves a location, a destination to be precise. It wants an element that answers “to what location/whereto” but no such element is in the sentence.
You could add it by saying “on the table“ for example. But there are also more generic options you can use
- I’m putting the book down/away.
And in German, the most generic option for a destination is … hin.
- Ich lege das Buch. NOPE!
- Ich lege das Buch auf den Tisch. Yup
- Ich lege das Buch hin. Yup
As you can see, hin fills up the “whereto”-slot of the sentence. And now we can understand why the sentence we had earlier sounds at least weird.
- Ich gehe fünfmal pro Woche [ins Fitnessstudio] [hin].
We have two fully functional, complete sounding answers to to what place here: ins Fitnessstudio and hin. And that sounds weird, and often wrong.
Cool.
Time for a quick recap:
Hin expresses the notion of “destination (other than “here”).
It can add this notion to words like da or hier, which by themselves can only answer “at the place”.
And it can be used to “fill” the “to what place”-box by itself.
This is pretty much all you need to know if you want to understand what hin means and does.
What we haven’t talked about yet, is the grammatical side of it.
Is it a prefix? Is it a stand alone? What about wohin? Is it da hin or dahin?
And that’s what we’ll talk about in part two.
Yup, that’s right… we’ll take a break here :). Originally, I wanted to do it in one post, but besides grammar, I also want to go over the most common phrasings with hin and I realized that all of it together would have been a little too much for one article.
So, for now just let that sink in and test yourself in the little quiz we have prepared.
And of course, please ask all your questions and your friends’ questions in the comments and I’ll try to clear them up. Oh, and let me know if you found this clear and helpful so far. Using hin correctly isn’t the most crucial thing in terms of being understood but it makes a huuuuuuge difference in how your German sounds, so it’s really important to me that you understand what’s going on.
So yeah, let me know your questions and feedback in the comments.
I hope you liked it and see you next time.

“Sie warf den Schraubenzieher zum Fenster heraus” am I right in thinking that the “her” used here is because the intended location was out the window, which happens to be away from the person throwing the screwdriver?
I can’t answer that without context.
Technically, yes, “her-” would indicate that whoever says this was outside and the screwdriver got tossed there BUT it can also just be that the writer is trying to sound fancy or is overapplying rules or comes from a region and time where it doesn’t matter.
If the speaker wanted to stress that the thing got tossed TO them, they’d use a different way, this her is too generic overall.
Does that help?
Or do you have more context by any chance?
Good overview. Clear.
Thanks, happy to hear that!
Could you explain why the answer to the second question of the quiz is “Ich will da gehen” and not “Ich will da hingehen”? What’s the difference between this and the “Ich bin da hingegangen” example you gave?
The question is asking which one is NOT a translation.
I wasn’t able to find part 2. I think you haven’t written it, right?
It is briefly mentioned in the article “Da” under the section called: “da” and “dahin” as “there”.
Yeah, I got stuck when I was writing it and then I usually just let it sit, which can be years sometimes.
Do you plan to write it? (craving for another article)
Lol, yeah, but it’s not happening this year. I’m currently getting stuck often enough on my book, so I need the website content work to “flow” :)
Hello,
First of all, thanks for such a great explanation!
At the same time, I am a bit lost. In the article about “her”, I quote:
“Because hier is about a current location, her is a destination.”
In this article:
“hin” – indicating a #destination
A bit confusing. It seems I understand the differenct, at least on exact examples, but the explanation, if you could somehow to rephrase it.
Just to note. I can imagine, how difficult to share such things. Even in my native Russian language I do not think about such differences.
Ah, good catch.
I had quite some time pass between writing these two articles so they’re not really well connected.
Think of “her” as “to here” and “hin” as a more generic destination which is more like “to there” or just “down”.
Does that help?
Guten Tag!
In the quiz there was this sentence: “Ich will dahin”,
Can the verb wollen function without an infitive at the end? Are there other examples where it would be understandable? German loooooves specifics so I find this a bit out of character.
Also in the quiz, what’s the difference between “Ich bin hingefallen” and “Ich bin dahin gefallen”? Is the second one gramatically wrong or does it have a different meaning?
Yes, this is a common phrasing in colloquial German.
– Ich will nach Hause.
– Ich muss zur Arbeit.
– Ich kann nicht nach Hause.
-…
– Ich darf nicht zum Konzert.
It’s also not really like a specific verb is skipped. It’s more like the concept of a motion verb is already half built in with the modals in these kinds of phrasings. Like… when you ask a German which verb is missing in “Ich will nach Hause.” they wouldn’t really know because it doesn’t matter. Could be “gehen”, could be “fahren”… no one cares.
About the other question:
– Ich bin hingefallen.
– I fell. (stumbled and fell down)
– Ich bin dahin gefallen.
– That is where I fell to.
The second one sounds really weird and only makes sense if you show someone the location where you ended up after falling there.
I like colloquial German.
– Ich bin dahin gefallen.
– That is where I fell to.
The English version is WEIRD it helped me get how weird it sounds in German.
Dankeschön Emanuel!
Hi Emanuel, is there a follow on article regarding hin? I thought the text above suggested so. In any case I do have a few queries:
1) I’m still slightly unsure as to when one would use an, zu or hin. For example, you can say “er geht ans Fenster” (?), but could you also say “er geht zum Fenster hin”? I think “zum Meer hin” means “towards the sea”, so is a location and hin used in that example because it is only direction(al) and not necessarily final destination?
2) Hinlegen is putting something down or away, but we also came across the concept of away/separation with “ab”. So what would the difference be between hinlegen and ablegen?
Thanks
Part 2 is still on my to do list (I know, it’s been way too long). I’ll have to read this again to see what I was actually planning to do next :)
1) “zu” and “an” are prepositions so they constitute a location together with a noun or pronoun. “zum Strand”, “ans “Fenster”, …
“hin” is a location by itself and does NOT combine with a noun.
“zum Fenster” is a destination, so there is no need to add “hin”. It is done sometimes to underline the directionality, rather than the getting there, but it can sound unidiomatic and I would stay away from doing that as a learner.
2) “ablegen” has a stronger focus on “down” and “away”… like removing. “hinlegen” has the focus more on just placing/putting down an object that can’t stand.
Hope that helps!
Thanks Emanuel, it definitely does for 2), I think I need to do a bit more thinking around 1) !! ;-)
Hi Emanuel
Do you have anything on the site which looks at an v hin v zu? I realise there’s a bit of a crossover between “towards, to and at (in the sense of towards rather than position). I am reading an article in which the following appear:
anlaecheln
zuwinken (what is the distinction here? Could we use zulaecheln and anwinken?)
Zurueck an die Arbeit (could this be Zurueck zur Arbeit?)
Thanks
If her indicates toward the speaker, then could I say “They’re coming here” as “Sie kommen hier her“?
Absolutely!
You actually HAVE to use “her” in that sentence. The “hier” is optional.
Thank you :3. By the way, I’ve seen that the way a word is spelled sometimes fluctuates depending on what case it’s in. For example, the plural of south is “Süde“, but when in dative, it’s spelled “Süden“. Is this something I should bother studying? (sorry for the long reply)
A fair portion of nouns does get an ending for Dative and Accusative. This is called n-declension, but unless you need it for a test, you don’t need to bother. Just know that it’s a thing and pick it up by rhythm over time. It’ll slow down your talking too much if you think about it.
“Süden” is NOT an example for that though. It’s “der Süden” and there is no “Süde”.
An example would be der Elefant.
Hallihallo Emanuel! Wunderbarer Post! Ist Teil 2 schon raus :) ?
Nee, noch nicht :). Tut mir leid :/!!
**standing ovation**
**bows down, remembers part 2 is still pending, goes backstage, checks facebook**
Hello Emanuel,
I LOVE your da/hin/her articles! It’s irritated for so long me not to have a proper explanation, and yours is very good.
I wondered if you’re familiar with the 30 Rock “I want to go to there” joke? (https://youtu.be/1w1VCJaUGiE) – It works as a joke because she says the English equivalent of “dahin” where it doesn’t fit, and it’s just awkward enough to be funny.
No I didn’t know that :). Is the character having some German heritage or did they put this in just as a running quirk in her speech? Would a native speaker ever say without being ironic about it?
It’s a quirk. It’s not something a native speaker would ever say (unless referencing this joke, I suppose). You can either say “I want to go there” or “I want to go to Chicago/the store/ a play/somewhere” – mixing them as “to there” sounds childish. Definitely wrong.
The only exception I can think of is with emphasis on the “to”, when correcting a misunderstanding (so, unlike how it’s said in 30 Rock):
me: So you want our route to bypass the city? Even though our friends are there?
them: No, I want to go *to* there!
Even then, that’s pretty awkward. But I could imagine it actually being said, at least. Maybe.
The character in the show isn’t German and doesn’t have German heritage, that I can tell, but while looking that up I found that she was an exchange student in Frankfurt for a year and speaks German somewhat, and finds German to be “the most beautiful language in the world”. :D
Wow, it’s quite a gamble then to add such a weird phrasing to a character that otherwise doesn’t have an accent :). But a great little bit of help for people who know the show and who’re learning German.
It’s something a little kid would say. I think that’s where Tina Fey got it from. The joke is she’s so taken by the idea of a private jet with popcorn that she forgets how to talk right. Or at least that’s how I always thought of it.
I think the character was said to be german at one point. I’ll be on the lookout during my next rewatch. In an audio commentary Tina Fey she said that the line came from her then very young daughter.
without wanting to spoil the long-awaited part II :)
Is there a reason why sometimes the hin is attached to the verb (hingehen) and sometimes attached to the place (eg. ging dorthin, ging hinauf, rannte hinunter)? (And why do some places get hin at the start (hinauf, hinein) and some at the end (dorthin/dahin)?
(I thought perhaps hinauf, etc were just prefixes of the verbs (hinaufgehen?), which makes sense, but dict.cc says they are standalone adverbs, so they can also just answer the question wohin on their own?)
Is there a difference between:
Ich bin dort hingegangen
Ich bin dorthin gegangen
(obviously not when we speak it!)
“hin” and “her” are kind of free spirits, and they attach to whatever feels the most natural.
– Ich gehe dorthin.
– Ich gehe dort hin.
– Ich bin dort hingegangen.
– Ich bin dorthin gegangen.
Only the last one sounds weird here, because it puts a weird emphasis on “GEHEN”, as if we’re pitting it against another form of movement.
When we speak, we don’t have to worry about that though. Ask a German, how to spell these examples and they’ll probably tell you that they’re not sure.
As for “hin” in front vs in the back… for that, I have a more conclusive answer:
– auf, aus and so on are prepositions. Here, adverbs of location like hin her or da can only attach at the front.
“da” and “dort” are adverbs of location. To them, hin and her can only attach to the rear.
Hope that helps :)
Wo gehst Du hin?
Correctly, the question word wohin is used, but it is often separated from the plain wo, which asks for location.
Wohin gehst du?
Likewise:
Wo kommst du her? asking for someone’s origin.
Woher is the real question word: woher kommst du?
I disagree with that analysis.
I think it makes just as much sense to say that the “hin” belongs to the verb in both these examples.
I am not seeing a link to HIN Part 2 (“Son of Hin”). I came here after a recent post that showed hin being more idiomatic at the end as Wo gehst du hin? I came across a sentence that was in past tense that was something like “Wohin bist du im Urlaub gereist?” (don’t hold me to those exact words…) and I was thinking: is it possible to have HIN at the end, split apart from wo? If I missed an obvious link to Part 2, I apologize.
I haven’t written part two yet… shame on me! I got stuck while structuring it and whenever I get stuck on a post, I walk away and let it be until my mind naturally comes back to it.
As for your question:
– Wo bist du im Urlaub hingereist.
This totally works!
Hey, is it possible that I missed a comment of yours? I can’t remember what post it was on…
Maybe… :)
Its ok. I know I ask a lot of questions.
I think it was about Sollen/Sollten and the slippery slope where “Ich sollte ein Nicherchen machen” could be a casual comment, or past tense (‘should have’) after being commanded/ordered to do so.*
*If wrong, than I am worse off than I thought.
So it would probably be under the article for Modal verbs which include Sollen.
Oh, it’s not you. I just got overwhelmed a bit by the feedback to the Duolingo article. That threw me off track a bit :D.
The comment you mentioned was indeed the one. I replied now.
Also, I forgot to reply to your question about how to tell me about typos… that’s actually what I remembered not having replied to. So the absolute best (and only) way is to put them right in the comments under an article. I tried by mail, but I really hate it, so yeah, comments is the way to go :)
Can’t find your notes feature to write out things I have learnt
Are you logged in?
Thank you for the article, very nice read. But I have a question. “hier hin” in “Ich lege das Buch hier hin.” It sounds to me like a contradiction: since “hin” is outward from speaker, but if “hier” is at the speaker, then what are we doing exactly? Are we putting the book away from the speaker or here? Besides that, I feel like “hier her” would be more natural here. Since “her” already means towards the speaker. Pls help :(
The speaker has the book in their hands, so putting it down is definitely “parting” from the book.
The “here” in this case is a location presented by the speaker… like “Here, on this desk.”
Does that help?
Yeah I guess so. But this has to be one of the of the hardest concepts to wrap my head around so far. Thank you again for the effort you put in and I am looking forward to part2!
Let me know if you have any more questions like that. I don’t think I’ll do part two soon. I’m completely “out of the topic” at the moment.
But I’m happy to help clear it up in the comments!
Oh my goodness. At the age of 45 after learning German I’m school, I’ve never fully understood hin/her until reading this post. Thank you, thank you, thank you x
Happy to hear that :)!
Hey Emanuel, thanks for the wonderful Article. But Emanuel even if I read all these explanations and there are so many of them, it becomes so daunting to remember each and every one of them and then put it all in context. I always end up getting so overwhelmed!
I can imagine!!
There is definitely more information in each article than is realistic to remember. What’s important is that you take one or two key takeaways. It’s totally fine to ignore the finer points.
Maybe you could use my notes-feature to write out two core learning after each article. Not more, just two.
And then you try to just remember those.
So, why “Ich lege das Buch hier hin“? Shouldn’t it be “Ich lege das Buch her“, or maybe “Ich lege das Buch hier her“? Because “her” means “here” with the sense of direction, and “hin” establishes a destination that it’s not “here”
The versions with “her” also work but to my ears they put a focus on the fact that the book is precisely “there” (here).
“hin” is more generic and just expresses that you put down the book, you put it “away” from your hands.
In the original example is really only expresses “destination”, nothing else. The rest is carried by “hier”.
Does that help?
Oh by the way… this stuff also depends on region. So in some parts of Germany, you version with “hier her” might be the more common one.
Thank you! The “away from your hands” idea made it totally clear to me