My Coming Book – Sample Chapter 2

cartoon about a sneak peek of an epic book

Hello everyone,

Summer is over, and so is our Update August.
*everyone is sad
But despair not, for this month has a special name too: Sneak Peek September.
*everyone is happy

Okay seriously, a lot of my writing energy is going to the book about prefix verbs right now and I also got a bit stuck with the edit of the second part of the series on German Word Order. I think I might just redo that article from scratch. Might be easier than to edit around the old one.

Anyway, so I didn’t manage to finish a new lesson for you just yet and I think the second part on word order will still take a while. But I do have a chapter in the book that talks about word order, and in particular about the underlying principle that “rules it all” and explains a lot.
And so I decided to just share that as another sample chapter.

Head Final – The Key to German Word Order

For context, the main part of the book is going to be a look at 32 of the most common prefix verbs, and how they get the meanings they have.
So I’m not spoiling main parts of the book here.
This chapter as well as the previous sample chapter I shared (find it here)are from the introduction section where I go over the needed grammar to get everyone up to speed.

But it’s a book, so there is enough “room” to go a bit beyond and learn not just the rules but also get some insight into WHY the rules are the way they are. Because understanding why something is the way it is makes it MUCH easier to remember.

German word order is a particularly great example for how one simple concept can transform a lot of confusion, stupid rules and exceptions into a super intuitive common sense. If you’re an avid reader of YourDailyGerman, you’ll probably have encountered this idea before, but I think it’s always good to get a refresher.

So if you’re ready to dive it, let’s gooooo!

Get My Newsletter

I'll send an email whenever I post a new lesson (once per week usually).

***

Head Final – A Key to German Word Order

“head final” is a special linguistic term that is used to describe kind of an order-paradigm for words that constitute an entity. And just so you know – this was the most complicated sentence in the entire chapter, and you can pretty much ignore it, because I’ll explain everything.

“head final” is not exactly well known. Even people who are fluent in ‘Grammarese’ often haven’t heard of it and it pretty much never comes up in the context of German teaching.
But that’s a huge missed opportunity. Because the concept of head final is an unbelievably powerful help for understanding German word order.

And it’s not even difficult to understand.

Let’s take a simple noun: coffee.
This is enough to constitute an element or entity in a sentence.

  • I don’t like [coffee].

But that’s very general, so let’s add in a bit more information about this coffee-entity.
Then, there are essentially two places where we can put it: before the main word, or after the main word.
Or in other words, head final (main word comes last), or head first (main word comes first).
An example for head first are for instance relative sentences.

  • I like [coffee that is overpriced and sour].

And an example for head final is when we add adjectives to the coffee directly.

  • I don’t like [sour, overpriced coffee].

The head of the noun-phrase, the coffee, comes after the adjectives, because that’s just how it is in English.

But it doesn’t have to be that way.
In French for example, the same sentence would look like this:

  • I don’t like Americano.

Okay, that was my deep resentment against the concept Americano talking. You know… because I find it sour and overpriced.

Seriously though, here’s how the example would actually look like in French:

  • Je n’aime pas [le café acide et trop cher].

Because in French, when you have a noun with an adjective, the noun (aka the head) typically comes first.
And in some languages like Italian or Portuguese, apparently both options work, each with their slightly distinct meanings.
There is no better or worse way, different languages just take different approaches.

So, now you know what head final means and that you’re already familiar with it because English uses the approach for nouns with adjectives.

But what does that have to do with German word order?
Well, take a look at this example:

  • the much-discussed, overly long, wildly complicated, and notoriously difficult to understand book

Structurally speaking, this is the same thing as “sour, overpriced coffee“.
The heads (coffee, book) are at the end, with a bunch of qualifiers before them. The only difference is that the book example is much longer, and in order to know what is talked about, we kind of “have to wait till the end“.

I think you might have a hunch where this is actually going.

You see, this concept of a “head” is not limited to nouns. It can also be used for actions and verbs.
Let‘s imagine we‘re writing a to do list for the weekend.
In English, it might look like this:

  • go shopping
  • play piano
  • drink a beer with Thomas
  • study for the exam next week

Each item on the list is one activity and what we can see here is that the verb comes first and the specifications follow. So for activities, English uses the head first approach here.
And now let’s see how the exact same list would look like in German:

  • shoppen gehen
  • Klavier spielen
  • mit Thomas ein Bier trinken
  • für die Prüfung nächste Woche lernen

This is the natural way in German and no native speaker would ever write it in the order that English uses.
It looks like it’s English reversed but what’s actually going on is that German simply uses head final for verbal phrases, while English uses head first.

So German uses the same approach that English uses for nouns with adjectives. For a German a verb phrase like “mit Thomas über das neue Projekt reden” is just as effortless and normal as a noun phrase like “the overly long and notoriously boring meeting” is for a native speaker of English.

Now, of course that doesn’t mean that the German approach to verbs now has to feel natural or that you’re not allowed to be confused by it. It’s different from what you’re used to, so of course it feels weird and of course you can get confused. But it’s not entirely new. It’s a concept you’re familiar with, used in a new place.

And understanding this idea of head final and how German uses it for its verbs can help us make sense of various aspects of German word order and sentence structure.
I don’t want to go into all of it here, but what particularly matters for us as we talk about the grammar separable prefix verbs is the whole “verb at the end” thing.

Because the verb or parts of the verb going to the end of a sentence in German doesn’t mean that they leave their “normal” place to go to that far far away land at the end.
What it really means is that the part of the verb is “going home from work”.
Let’s do an example:

  • am Sonntag mit Thomas Schach spielen
  • play chess with Thomas on Sunday

This is just a verbal phrase, as we’d put it on a to-do list. The verb (the head) sits at the end in German and at the beginning in English, and the other elements are arranged based on where the head is.

Now, let’s see it as a sentence

  • Ich spiele am Sonntag mit Thomas Schach.
  • I‘m playing chess with Thomas on Sunday.

Sentences like these make it appear that German sentence structure is basically just like English, but with some random twists. In reality though, when you look at the order of elements, you can see that in German, they’re still ordered the way they were before in the to-do list version. Only the verb at the end is missing. That’s because the verb had to go to position 2 for “work“.
But now, let’s put this into past tense:

  • Ich habe am Sonntag mit Thomas Schach gespielt.

Here, we have a second verb, the helper verb haben. It’s now the one basically taking on the “shift” at position 2 – and the other part of the verb gets to go home to the end.

I know this might sound a bit confusing even for advanced learners, because it’s usually not taught that way. But essentially, you can think of any German sentence as having a verb slot at the end – the verb’s “home”.
It can be empty sometimes because the verb is at work in position number two. But the slot at the end is still there, and if the verb or part of it doesn’t have to be at work, it’ll go home.

Now, of course we could explore this in much more depth, but that would be a bit out of the scope of this book. Maybe think of it as a region that you find on vacation while exploring something else and you think to yourself “Wow, this place looks really interesting. I definitely want to go there and explore at some point.”
There definitely are some hidden gems waiting that most mainstream learners of German don’t know about yet.

But now let’s get back to our actual topic – the separable prefix verbs.
In the next chapter, we’ll get a basic overview over their grammar, and you’ll see the effects of what we just learned – “head final for verbs” – on full display.

***

 

So, what did you think?
Again, like with the last sample chapter, my main worry is that it’s maybe too dense, especially for beginners or people who have a harder time with grammar and theory in general. I’m trying to make it interesting for every level, A1 to C1, so I have to find a balance between basics and depth. And also speed, because like I said… this is more like the introductory portion of the book.

So please let me know ALL your thoughts and feedback in the comments. Of course it’s also great if you find typos and let me know, but I definitely will have someone edit this book properly before release, so don’t worry.

I really hope you enjoyed this, have a great day and see you next week.

Oh and if you want to check out more about the book and sign up to my book mailing list, you can find our page here:

German Prefix Verbs – The Book

4.5 8 votes
Article Rating
Emanuel

Emanuel Creator & Author

World's best teacher of German words and grammar. Full Bio →

German GrammarVocabulary • Etymology

Get My Newsletter

I'll send an email whenever I post a new lesson (once per week usually).

Your Comments and Questions

guest

63 Comments
Newest
Oldest

tayfunyigit
tayfunyigit

It is a hard topic. However after several reads, one really gets the lightbulb.
Good work!

culturalanimus
culturalanimus

” But the slot at the end is still there, and if the verb or part of it doesn’t have to be at work, it’ll go home.”

Your are probably correct with your hypothesis, and I love to learn how languages tick, but I find it hard to apply it to practice. Speaking from the position of learner, does this help to understand some hard parts of German? Is this really more informative, than simply remembering, that with “haben” or “werden” main verbs stand at the end of a sentence?

Last edited 9 months ago by culturalanimus
culturalanimus
culturalanimus
Reply to  Emanuel

I’ve understood importance of the head-final concept after reading your series on word order and the position of nicht. It helps understand how moving words earlier and further in the sentence creates emphasis. I hope you include overview of this topic in your book.

ultraviolet
ultraviolet

I actually love the ‘language geekery’, both in the sample chapter and in your articles in general and that’s what keeps me coming back here. I have a degree in English Language though and this type of content lets me deepen my ‘geekery’ in English while helping me to improve my understanding of German, so for me, this style of writing is the perfect mix. I also *really* need help with the German prefixes, so I’m looking forward to your book coming out. I’ll definitely get the e-book version if that comes out first, but I prefer a paper version of my ‘study’ books so I can flick through them, so please don’t give up the idea of producing a physical book.

Adrian Wiliams
Adrian Wiliams

I have two sentences from the tutorial on Perfekt & Präteritum which I think I understand:

Das oben gezeigte Pseudoperfekt ergibt sich nur aus der Konstruktion zweier Sätze mit verschiedenen Verben.

Is the “-er” in “zweier” correct? I like the look of it. I want it to be correct. But I’ve only ever seen that done with an adjective in forming the genitive plural, not a number.

Paritzipien sind Adjektive und keine Verbalformen, wie oft in germanistischen Grammatiken behauptet.

Shouldn’t “behauptet” be followed by “wird”? Also shouldn’t “Verbalformen” just be “Verbformen”?

Harald
Harald
Reply to  Adrian Wiliams

“Zweier”, “dreier” are written or old-fashioned formal designations, as numerals following “ein” are not declined in modern German.

Contemporary German might employ, for example,”dieser zwei/drei….”, however, as we know, the Dative case is gradually overtaking the Genitive, just as Bastian Sick predicted over a decade ago!

Anisha
Anisha

Hi Emanuel
I just completed the B1 level !!! and still processing the whole journey. All the credit goes to this platform, as I’ve been a constant visitor here for all my queries.
Sending lots of ‘gratitude-filled wishes’ for your upcoming book.
Please make it fast, as it can help me with the B2 exam :)
Danke

Rominatsr
Rominatsr

A real perfectionist is supposed to replant a tree, rebuild the house and reeducate his son (says a sarcastic proverb :D ). Emmanuel feels the urge to rewrite his articles in exchange :-)

gallia_a
gallia_a

Are you planning to keep color in the book? I remember from the other post that you intend to publish an ebook, so color could be maintained. However, in this extract the color is used inconsistently; if you use green for all instances of “head first” and blue for all instances of “head final”, it will be easier for readers to notice the pattern. Instead, in this chapter you start writing “head final” in green, but then you use it for the English “shopping list”, but after that it is used for the German. The opposite for blue.
If the color is intended to highlight the two different patterns it should be used consistently throughout the text

Yseult Louvel
Yseult Louvel

I really like the way you explain German, and l enjoy the humour. I do like the suggestion below about having two sections (beginner and intermediate/advanced. I’m buying this book when it’s available and getting membership so l can access more of your brain and get traction on German. It’s been on the back burner for good reasons, but it’s time to crank it up.

Harald
Harald
Reply to  Yseult Louvel

As a German teacher of many years, learning to eventually kick start the brain into thinking, feeling, appropriately reacting in a culturally accepted fashion, truly understanding the language in nearly any native speaker setting, obviously requires way way more than simply a textbook or an Internet program!

Living the language authentically means absorbing the language through the everyday, ideally by spending considerable time in a native German-speaking home, from there, allowing for the golden opportunity of interning in a German-speaking work place where the nitty gritty of daily
life can be mentally absorbed, internalized, and naturally applied.

David N
David N

Just a thought… if you want to make it both accessible and interesting to all levels of learners, you could split the article into two:
Section A is an explanation for beginnners.
Section B develops Section A and adds the additional points for intermediate/advanced learners.

IknowBubble
IknowBubble

Sorry for the irrelevant mention but I think logo panel of blog site has changed and it’s quite difficult to read on mobile as logo box charging almost one third of screen and text are below smaller! And as logo box is white, nightmode lose its meaning pls ignore if it show up only to me

IknowBubble
IknowBubble
Reply to  Emanuel

Iphone and chrome to open your blog. And normaly there was menu tap on the left above made of three lines? It’s also gone so to go to menu I have to go to home page from the beginning. Just to let you know for improvement. I can wait

Jeffrey
Jeffrey
Reply to  IknowBubble

If you open the site in an “incognito tab” it will load the normally cached stuff anew and you’ll see what the site should look like now. I have the same issue as you but it looks fine incognito.

Last edited 11 months ago by Jeffrey
IknowBubble
IknowBubble
Reply to  Jeffrey

Thanks a lot! I gotta do it secretly then :)

Barbara
Barbara

It’s a useful explanation for a more advanced learner, especially the “home” vs “work” concept. However, from the excerpt I didn’t really understand why the verb still holds a “working” position early in the sentence, if its “home” is at the end. Maybe that is covered in another chapter, though.

I’m not sure that the explanation would be as helpful for a new learner, but as a “deep dive” it is certainly a valuable addition! I hadn’t heard of the Head Final concept before. (Apologies if you’ve already covered this in another comment response, I haven’t read them all yet.)

coleussanctus
coleussanctus
Reply to  Emanuel

What if there was a separate section about word order? An intro about “head final,” then a nutshell primer on word order so we can get a feel for how verbs go in different sentences.

Something like, the verb goes at the end by default, and side sentences have the default word order. In a main sentence, the finite part of the verb moves to the second position (which isn’t necessarily the second word). Which happens to look like English, but that’s not what’s going on under the hood. And maybe something about word order in common types of questions.

It sounds like a lot, but it can be done in a long-ish Reddit comment. That kind of info scratched the “why” itch for me.

Jeffrey
Jeffrey

Honestly I liked that last chapter, in terms of writing style, more. The idea here is useful but I feel like there is more filler and quasi digressions, where you start to digress but then say “ahh but not now” to which I say “but please digress!” or leave the start of the digression out (go big or go home). I found the “like an espresso but better coffee” part interesting in that it pointed out that English speakers are used to putting some things at the end as well, German just does it more consistently, but the many examples with different adjectives seemed to be getting away from the purpose of explaining verb and prefix placement. And you didn’t get into the harder topic of how the various adjectives are ordered.

And the more relevant potential digression is missing: why does German even put the verb in position 2? Like “verb is important and important stuff goes to the end” is great, but why does a basic sentence put the verb in position 2 then? Something like “actually all the stuff after the verb is effectively a “half sentence” (nebensatz) so the verb is at the end of the first “half sentence” and then a second verb is also at the end of the second “half sentence”? I just made that up and I’d love a researched answer.

Jeffrey
Jeffrey
Reply to  Emanuel

Actually the whole discussion of head in the context of adjectives and nouns feels like the unnecessary digression. I feel like the concept of head is sufficiently introduced with the verb examples, which are the core of the book anyway. The adjective section just makes fun of a perfectly valid coffee choice. Then you could just say that is concept of head is there for all syntax structures such as nouns and their adjectives, but also conjunctions, question phrases, etc, and whether a language is head first or last can vary for each structure.

This all became a lot clearer for me today when i started poking into “why position 2”. I read through a couple of very dense linguistics articles and started to get an idea of the linguistic theory used for breaking down syntax structures. There is a lot of ambiguity though, and specifically there is little consensus to the origin of “verb 2nd” in Germanic languages.

Generally agreed is that the default structure is verb at the end, and then there are various arguments for why it jumps to position 2 to do some essential work there. I don’t think you can or should try to solve this debate in your book but i found that learning that the default place for the verb is the end and that it comes forward to position 2 to express things like tense and fact vs conjecture really enlightening, even if the cause for this structure isn’t known.

Last edited 11 months ago by Jeffrey
ExDC
ExDC
Reply to  Jeffrey

I agree with Jeffrey that the writing in this chapter is a bit too scattered, but for a different reason. I think there are too many digressions and flippant remarks for this topic, which is conceptually more difficult. I did understand it and appreciate learning about “head first”/”feet first” – oops “head final”/”head initial” (which I have seen instead of “head first” in some explanation). But you are a bit too loose and flippant in Chapter 2. In a more dense or difficult explanation, the diversions, while helpful to lighten the process, should be fewer and/or shorter, or the reader can get lost. And from several comments here, it appears that you may need to make a chapter on modal verbs Chapter 1.5, located before you get to Chapter 2, to explain your “haben ….gespielt” example.

DoomedJack
DoomedJack

It is a very useful framing for the word order. Thanks! But I feel like you are taking a bit too long with writing a book. I will finish learning German faster than you finish!

coleussanctus
coleussanctus

I don’t think it’s too dense. I think it’s pretty easy to understand, except the first sentence, and for that I would say…mission accomplished :) There are a few places where you could maybe tweak it so it clicks a little faster. Just a few small things in the spots with grammar (or grammar-ish) terms.

I like the part about going to work. It sticks in your brain.

coleussanctus
coleussanctus
Reply to  Emanuel

Sure do!

This is enough to constitute an element or entity in a sentence.

“Entity” makes me pause for a second to think about it. It feels more abstract than “element” somehow. Maybe if it was left out, or there was a very short explanation. It’s a key piece of info, part of the “who what when where.” Or like one of the actors or props on stage.

An example for head first are for instance relative sentences

I’d consider adding a quick explanation of what a relative clause is. For example, a description that comes after the main word and it’s sometimes connected by “that.”

You see, this concept of a “head” is not limited to nouns. It can also be used for actions and verbs.

Nothing wrong with this, but if you wanted, you could do something like this:

  • You see, this concept of a “head” is not limited to things (nouns). It can also be used for actions (verbs).

I think you might have a hunch where this is actually going.

Unrelated, but this would sound better without “actually.”

layman
layman

I am not a beginner and did not think it was too dense. I grasped the idea immediately and found it helpful!

moosh
moosh

I really enjoyed this chapter preview. The density seemed perfect and the idea (head first/last) well presented. You have increased my interest in the final book! Keep doing what you’re doing.

Anonymous
Anonymous

I am really enjoying your approach to learning German. I am in the B1-B2 range and I liked the word order with head first and head final with the examples very much. It might not be quite as helpful to someone who was not an English speaker but it really helps to be reminded of what is similar and what is different.

kgeatright
kgeatright

The whole ‘head first’ vs ‘head final’ was really new to me, and suuuuuper fascinating!! I also like how you gave examples of German, French, and English- I’m a native English speaker but learned Spanish and French as a child, and I’ve struggled with German word order b/c the foreign language part of my brain defaults back to the word order of the Romance languages. This was something really cool to think about- vielen Dank!!

Harald
Harald

In my umpteen-odd years of teaching German to non-German, Anglophone college students, I’d have to say that besides those quixotic, grammatical gender assignments, word order is probably the most troublesome aspect for those learning German as their first second language!

Your examples are excellent, of course, and very few Americans in my experience can ever “feel” or internalize the basic difference between “Ich spielte Klavier” vs. “Ich habe Klavier gespielt“, for example.

However, the Brits seem to have a far easier time of it:-)

Last edited 11 months ago by Harald
coleussanctus
coleussanctus
Reply to  Harald

For me, the hard part was finding an explanation that made sense. A lot of them were complicated. Or they made sense at first, but fell apart later. Those were the ones that said the verb has to be in the second position and stopped there.

About that last part, have you heard this joke? If someone who speaks two languages is bilingual, and someone who speaks three languages is trilingual, what do you call someone who speaks one language?

coleussanctus
coleussanctus
Reply to  Emanuel

An American!

Harald
Harald
Reply to  coleussanctus

When I lived in the States, I heard a similar quip about a cat chasing a mouse back into its hole, only to be met with a loud “WAU WAU!” from the mouse.
At which point, the scared, startled cat scampers away. One of the mice then turns to his neighbor,
“You see how good it us to know another language!”

Jeffrey
Jeffrey
Reply to  Harald

Actually many Americans do know another language, it is just probably not Your language because there are like 3000 languages in the world. Most people learn their local language and English. But an American or Brit already knows English, and what are the chances that the second language they learn will be yours?

And the opportunities to practice any language other then English are pretty limited, so no they probably don’t speak that other language as well as you speak English.

Last edited 11 months ago by Jeffrey
Harald
Harald
Reply to  Jeffrey

Yes, Jeffrey! Unfortunately you’re right. Frankly, I think many native speakers, particularly Americans, are intimidated by certain languages, German among them.

Many of us in Europe also do have a bad habit of feeling they can switch to English as soon as we hear an “American accent”.

I was exposed to English through my US-born dad when I was practically knee-high to a grasshopper. My German mother though always deferred to my father in matters concerning proper English:-)

Anonymous
Anonymous

That’s clear to me. I think I can see where you’re going with it:

dog + man = main verb (ausführen)
assistant = helper verb (sein, haben, etc.)
man = main verb stem (führen)
dog = separable prefix (aus)
**** = anything you like describing project

Ein ***** Projekt ausführen.
(no action yet; man at home with his dog)

Er führt das **** Projekt aus.

(man goes to work; dog stays at home)

Ein Assistent werde das **** Projekt ausführen.
(assistant goes to work; man stays at home with dog)

Before work starts, the man (main verb stem – führen) is at home with his dog (separable prefix – aus), thinking about the project. When the man goes to work, he has to leave his dog at home, but when the man’s assistant (helper verb – werde) goes to work for him, he stays at home with his dog.

Am I on the right lines, or is this confusing?

opie
opie
Reply to  Anonymous

I was about to comment that I like the “at work” and “at home” framework – but, after reading your comment, Anonymous, the “dog + man” version is even more appealing! Both analogies make verbs’ positions so much easier for me to grasp!