
Hello everyone
And welcome to our German Word of the Day,
this time, with a closer look at the modal verb
sollen
Since it’s one of the modal verbs, people usually meet it very early on, but then they never really use it and even among advanced learners there’s this lingering uncertainty about it. Like… What does it actually mean exactly? How to translate it? And there’s the question about the difference ich soll vs ich sollte and more generally about how to translate should in German.
In this lesson, we’ll clear it all up.
We’ll start with a little look at the origin and family of sollen, because there are some surprises waiting there.
Then we’ll talk about the main meaning and how to best translate sollen and then we’ll explore if there are other uses or meanings.
And last but not least, we’ll talk about soll vs sollte.
Sounds a lot, but don’t worry, we’ll take a little break in between so you can go get a coffee or on vacation or whatever.
Yeah… it’s going to be a two part lesson :)
Anyway, are you ready to dive in?
Then let’s go!
The interesting origin of “sollen” and “should”
Many of you probably know that sollen is the German brother of English shall. What you might not know is that they’re also related to the German words around die Schuld. Yes, the one that’s at the core of Entschuldigung.
Schuld itself means guilt (and sometimes fault) but the plural die Schulden is actually the German word for debt, and the verb schulden means to owe.
- Ich schulde dir eine Entschuldigung.
- I owe you an apology.
(“Entschuldigung” – “de-guilt-ification”)
- Practice pronunciation – click once to start recording and again to stop
This example kind of shows the connection between the two. You feel guilty and so you feel like you owe an apology. Like… in a way, guilt is what you feel if you don’t settle some sort of debt.
I’ve explored this word cluster in more detail in a separate post, so I’ll leave the link below if you want to dig deeper.
But yeah, this idea of guilt and owing someone is actually kind of the core theme of the family and it was indeed the idea of the super duper ancient Indo-European root that the family comes from.
And we can find shades of it in other members of the family as well.
Take the word should for example.
For one thing, it looks a LOT like Schuld.
But more importantly, the ideas are directly connected as well. If you owe (schulden) someone an apology, you’d say that you SHOULD apologize. Like… in a way you can think of to owe as “should give”.
In fact, shall and should could literally mean to owe back a few hundred years ago, but they have shifted over time toward a more abstract and fairly diffuse sense of obligation.
- You shall not steal.
(You “are obliged” not to steal)
It can also morph into the idea of permission at times, which makes sense if you think of permission as a removing an “obligation not to”.
- Okay, you shall steal now.
(The obligation “not to steal” is removed – permission)
And sometimes, it can even cross over into sort of expressing future tense.
- I shall call you tomorrow.
This is a weird blend of future and obligation.
It sounds a bit pompous in English, but in Swedish, this phrasing actually became the proper future tense. In English, future tense evolved from a statement of intent (I will), in Swedish it evolved from talking about one’s obligations (“I shall”). And the German option with werden evolved from talking about which direction you “grow”. It’s kind of cool how even languages that are rather close relatives can use very different ways to express the same…
*buiiii buiiiii buiiiiiiii
Oh… hah… hold on.
*beeping stops
So that was actually my new digressio-meter that warns me if I veer off track too far. Sorry for that.
So yeah, the core theme that we found in all members of the family we just looked at was a sense of obligation.
And that’s also the core of sollen.
The main meaning of “sollen”
When you first come in contact with sollen, you might learn it as the German brother of shall. And that’s not wrong, as we’ve just seen, but it’s also a bit misleading because the usages don’t line up all that well.
They do line up in the classic commandment style phrasing.
- Thou shalt not eat my yogurt without asking.
- Du sollst nicht meinen Jogurt essen, ohne zu fragen.
But they do NOT line up at all in the use that leans more toward the future.
- Apologies! I shall never eat your yogurt again.
- Entschuldigung! Ich soll nie wieder deinen Jogurt essen… NOPE!!
The German sentence is not wrong, but it does not mean the same as the English one.
What the German version actually means is this:
- Apologies! Someone told me to never eat your yogurt again.
Because the core idea of sollen is obligation in the specific sense of someone wants me to.
Hold on, let me say that again, but in a box:
Take this example:
- Ich soll morgen ins Büro.
- Practice pronunciation – click once to start recording and again to stop
This doesn’t just mean that I have to go to the office tomorrow. It means that someone WANTS me to go to the office tomorrow (and told me so).
That’s the core of sollen.
It does NOT include a notion of actually doing it or agreeing that I should indeed do it.
And it also doesn’t really include “obligations” that arise from circumstances, which brings us to the difference between sollen and müssen.
The Difference between “sollen” and “müssen”
Suppose you want to catch the train at 7, and in order to do that, you have to get up at 6. You could say that getting up at 6 is an “obligation” now, but it’s circumstantial.
Even if your friend tells you “Get up at 6 tomorrow if you want to catch the train.” the reason for you getting up would still be mainly the circumstances, not the fact that your friend told you to.
This can sometimes get lost in translation.
- Ich muss um 6 aufstehen.
- I have to get up at 6.
- Practice pronunciation – click once to start recording and again to stop
- Ich soll um 6 aufstehen.
- I have to get up at 6. (someone told me to do it)
- Practice pronunciation – click once to start recording and again to stop
The first one is just making a statement about the facts. The second one is kind of making a statement about what someone said to you and it could well be that you don’t agree with it at all.
- My boss says I have to clean her car… yeah, no way I’m doing that.
- Meine Chefin sagt, ich soll ihr Auto putzen… ja genau, auf keinen Fall mach ich das.
You could also use müssen here, but sollen specifically stresses that it’s something she TOLD you.
I hope you can feel the difference between these two. It’s a bit hard to really capture in a simple one word translation actually.
So let’s look at some more examples for sollen to get a better feel for it.
- Wir sollen um 8 zu Hause sein, hat Mama gesagt.
- We have to be home by 8, mom said.
- Practice pronunciation – click once to start recording and again to stop
- Laut meinem Arzt soll man dreimal täglich eine Tablette nehmen.
- According my doctor you’re supposed to / you have to take one pill three times per day.
- Practice pronunciation – click once to start recording and again to stop
- “Warum spritzt du deine Katze mit Sprühflasche nass?”
“Die soll lernen, dass sie nicht auf den Tisch darf.” - “Why are you spraying your cat with a spray bottle?”
“She has to learn/ I want her to learn that she’s not allowed on the table. - Practice pronunciation – click once to start recording and again to stop
- “Wann soll ich morgen kommen?”
“So gegen 8 wäre gut.” - “What time do you want me to/should I come tomorrow?”
- Practice pronunciation – click once to start recording and again to stop
- “Soll ich Bier mitbringen?”
“Nee, nur dich und gute Laune.” - “Should/do you want me to bring beer?”
“Nah, just bring yourself and a good mood.” - Practice pronunciation – click once to start recording and again to stop
As you can see, the contexts vary quite a bit and so does the most accurate translation. But I hope you can see the core theme of sollen in all of them:
The idea of “someone wants someone to do something“.
In the first one, the mom wants the kids to be home by 8. In the second one, the doctor wants the patient to take the pills three times per day. In the third one, I want my cat to learn to stay away from the table and the last two are basically asking someone what they want me to do, just in a friendly context.
Now, many of you are probably wondering if we could also use sollte in these two examples. And the answer to that is …drumroll… what we’ll find out next time.
Nah, kidding of course.
I can’t leave you hanging like that.
The answer is no.
And the reason for why it wouldn’t work is … drumroll… what we’ll find out next time.
Hahahaha…got’em!
I’m sorry, I really couldn’t resist.
But seriously, every good show needs a good cliffhanger, and I feel like this is the perfect moment to take a little break.
In part two (which will come out very soon, I promise) we’ll explore all about soll vs sollte and how they relate to should. And we’ll also look at some side uses of sollen itself that you’ll see in daily life sooner or later.
The key takeaway for today is the core idea of sollen, this theme of “we’ll go over that in the quiz again”.
Oh boy… I’m on fire right now.
But yeah, if you want to recap what we’ve learned so far and go over a few examples, just take the little quiz I have prepared. It’s just 5 questions, but better than nothing, I think.
And of course if you have any questions or suggestions or thoughts, just leave me a comment and we’ll continue the discussion there.
I really hope you enjoyed this, have a great week and I’ll see you next time.
Further reading:

Just wanted to add my wish that “sollten” were covered in an article. I tried AI, but I don’t believe the answer. I’d like to hear your explanation of how it differs from “sollen”. Thanks.
You know what…I had actually completely forgotten that this was still pending!! This is a really welcome reminder. I’ll add it to my short term todo list now.
Hi Emmanuel
Coming to this late as I’ve been offline (so to speak) for the last couple of months. Just wanted to check that Part 2 is yet to be released, and that I haven’t simply failed to locate it?
Thanks
Steve
Just went down a little etymological rabbit trail on Sold (which is where Soldat and Söldner [mercenary]) come from.
So that one is borrowed via French from Latin and is originally related to “solid” – it’s the “solid coin” paid to soldiers for their service. HOWEVER, under the influence of sollen and Schuld, it also came to mean “duty” or “obligation” in Mittelhochdeutsch.
Oh nice one. I didn’t think of “Sold”, but if it had come to my mind, I’d 100% expected it to be related to sollen.
Now, I’m wondering about “Can you do me a solid?”. I mean… I’m pretty sure it’s just a coincidence, but it’s a bit funny.
“Those mercenaries really did us a solid against Napoleon.”
Ich freue mich ur auf den zweiten Teil dieses Artikels, um über “sollte” zu lesen.
Wow, I didn’t know about this nature of sollen… I always treated it as a less peremptory brother of müssen
Found this gem on today’s morning, maybe it’s a sign for me to start learning German again. Thank you for this website.
Willkommen hier :)
Du sollst nächste Woche das zweite Teil über Sollte posten. (to post something ?)
Ja, das wäre gut, aber das schaffe ich nicht :)
Mist… :)
I agree wholeheartedly with jgsheppard. That’s the first really clear, uncomplicated explanation I’ve seen. I’m optimistic that this will actually stick in my brain. Looking forward to the follow-up article!
Maybe the first reasonable exploration of “sollen” contrasted with “mussen” I have seen since I started Deutsch zu lernen. Sehr gut. Danke.
Oh, happy to hear that but it’s also kind of sad, at least for the German teaching space :)
Wanted to say how insanely thankful I am for this community to sponsor broke lads like me)
I’m a Ukrainian moving to Germany, so is going to be a huge help.
Can’t wait to stand on my own feet and start giving back to the community
Another excellent article!
It’s interesting that the “is supposed to” sense or translation is most often treated as secondary to the “shall” translation. As others have remarked, “shall” is rarely used in English this way where “should” is usually preferred (or “is supposed to”, even “ought to”. and others)
A couple of minor comments:
1. “Heidi soll hübsch sein” – “Heidi is said to be pretty.” Just another possible use of “sollen” similar in sense to “is supposed to” by using “sein”.
2. English “shall” as alternative to “will” in future tense is of course. never “sollen” but “werden”. But I think you can say the following if the outside obligation is to be emphasised: “Ich soll ihn morgen besuchen.” = I’m supposed to visit him tomorrow”.
Yeah, I’ll talk more about the “is said to”-meaning in part two. It’s definitely common and good to know!
Another way to translate “sollen” could be “ought to”. I feel, “ought to” have more of a sense “it is expected of me/him/them to do something”.
however, considering the quiz says “sentence says that someone (Maria or someone else) wants me to be at home by 7, but there is no “actual” need beyond that”, I could be wrong here. Ought to kinda implies some need.
So purely based on the “vibe”, I’d say that “ought to” matches well with “sollte”, which has much less focus on this notion of “someone wants me to” and instead is more about a general need.
Hallo,
Some typos first:
“there this lingering uncertainty about it” (there‘s this lingering uncertainty about it)
“Even if you’re friend tells you” (Even if your friend tells you)
Thanks, after almost 8 years of learning German, I realised I still didn’t know how to use “sollen” properly!!!!
Great article :)
Bis bald!
” I realised I still didn’t know how to use “sollen” properly!!!”
Really? But mostly the “soll” vs “sollte” part, no?
Your German is so good generally, I’d be surprised if you really struggled with “sollen”.
One of the stranger aspects in play here is just how small a role “shall” plays in modern English. I would venture that there’s a largish proportion of native speakers who’ve *never* used the word in conversation, except perhaps in mimicking Gandalf’s exhortation to the Balrog: “You shall not pass!”. With that in mind, I think it gives us German learners a good rule-of-thumb: if your teacher is routinely translating “sollen” and friends with “shall”, as I recall seeing on some youtube channels, then you need to change teachers, and find someone who speaks better (modern) English.
I actually find it quite tough to point out the zone where “shall” still has some *bite*, but it does seem to work best in questions: “Where shall we go to eat?”, or “Shall we go now, or would you rather wait for an hour or so?”, or “Shall I open the champagne?” (Slightly different from “Should I open the champagne?”, which is more like a request for permission, or advice)
German? Oh yeah, that’s right, we’re learning German! I think a good translation for “sollen” is often “meant to”, a phrase that is super idiomatic in everyday Australian English, but I’m not actually sure whether it carries the same resonances elsewhere. I guess it’s similar to the “supposed to” that Chip recommended above:
“I am meant to take four tablets a day, but who’s got time for that?”. “I’m meant to be in bed by 9pm.” “They’re meant to take out the garbage.” It’s a lighter form of “have to” or even “should”, and essentially points out that someone’s prescribed that such a task should be completed, but it’s up to the individual…
– “Shall I open the champagne?”
– “Soll ich den Champagner aufmachen?”
It’s really interesting how these two mean the same thing semantically, but they’re COMPLETELY different in tone and vibe. The German is basic normal colloquial German that everyone would use, the English feels pompous to me.
Ugh… I can’t believe this is even a thing. In old school classrooms, maybe, but on Youtube?!
A for “meant to”… this is interesting. It does kind of express the same idea, but the “feel” it has is different for me. I’m not a native speaker of course, so that might be the reason, but I feel the “explanatory” component of “meaning” quite a bit here. Like… “What I meant is that you should take out the trash”.
Do you feel that at all, or is it just a soft “have to/should/was told”?
“Shall I open the champagne” doesn’t really sound so much pompous to me as deferential and super-polite. James Bond would readily say such a thing to his bikini-clad companion. “Should I…” doesn’t fit so well here, and there’s no obvious alternative I know of that carries the same kind of feel.
The “sollen as shall” might be commoner than you might think. Even “Your German Teacher”, who’s mostly decent and reliable comes up with “You shall sleep now” for “Ihr sollt jetzt schlafen”, and “He shall be quiet now” for “Er soll jetzt still sein”, when a simple “should” would sound infinitely better in English.
https://youtu.be/VnhkeHwQnt8?si=IVraQbgFcCCx-iMl&t=236
And I’ll just claim that there are much more egregious examples out there, but don’t really have the stomach to substantiate it right now ;-)
The “meant to” reading/translation doesn’t have any of the “explanatory” aspect in my mind: it’s a relatively straightforward, unadorned “supposed to/should” alternative. But, as above, it could be a little regionally dependent, so it’d be good to hear how it feels to some Brits and/or Yanks before crowing too loudly.
Hmmm, yeah, this is a bit of a strange video in how they structured it. But okay, it’s 5 years old. My ancient articles don’t exactly shine with clarity either.
As an American, your meant to sounds fine and I understand it, but I wouldn’t say it. In American English, “meant to”= “intended to do” and is mostly used for internal reasons for doing something. “Crap, I meant to buy milk but was totally distracted by the whisky and forgot”
Aah, thanks for the reply, and super interesting that it’s more about intention than some form of external prescription in the US. Now I’m left wondering where our UK counterparts stand on the issue!
I meant to = internal and very common in American English
I am meant to = external and uncommon in American English
Yeah, I tend to gloss “be meant to” as BE for AE’s “be supposed to.” I’d consider both to be the go-to mental translation for sollen.
I’d say for me in AE, most of the “shall” examples would be more or less indistinguishable from “should” in natural speech and most people wouldn’t really give much thought to which was meant (or actually pronounced).
One exception that sounds maybe just slightly theatrical but is absolutely idiomatic is to say, “Shall we?” to sort of initiate whatever you and your companion(s) are intending to do. It definitely needs to be “shall” there – and to my ear, that’s more of the shall/should difference: “shall” sounds more clearly like a suggestion, “should” can be a real question.
I’m not even sure I’d go as far as pmccann on “Shall I open the champagne?” – to me, it sounds like a less casual way to say, “How about I open the champagne?” It’s a suggestion, graciously expressed and fitting to a bit of an occasion.
Shall is certainly used in English. „We shall overcome“, the song. „We shall fight them on the beaches“-Churchill. „When shall we three meet again in thunder, lighting or in rain“. „ Shall I compare thee to a summer’s day“. Shall was actually the correct first person Singular Future in English „I shall“ not I will and „we shall“ not we will, although has changed with contemporary usage.
Danke, das was sehr interessant & lustig (ich bin tim – Entschuldigung, i hab meine nane vergessen)
Kein Problem :). Danke für das schöne Feedback!
Amazing article!
I’ve wondered a long time for the equivalent “shall” in English: I only use “should” but not “shall”.
The only time I see it used is in religious texts, such as in the 10 commandments: “Thou shalt not steal”, “Thou shalt not commit adultery” etc. I suppose it’s quite similar to the explanation you give for “sollen”, meaning you’re not supposed to steal because God told you not to.
It’s however not used colloquially when someone tells you to do something or when you’re supposed to do something.
Yeah, the commandments are basically “God wants you to NOT do X” :).
FWIW, it’s also definitely used in modern legal language (law codes and such) to express an obligation.
I mean, I don’t have the feeling that in German you’re normally consciously thinking about who’s expecting what you soll, right? The point is that the expectation or requirement or obligation is external and not a logical necessity.
In the Ten Commandments (and other biblical commands), there’s actually no modal verb in the Hebrew – just the negative particle lo’ and the verb in the imperfect, which kind of covers future and various modal/subjunctive sort of functions. There’s a different negative particle used with the imperative to express “don’t ____” in a more immediate, non-legal way.
“I don’t have the feeling that in German you’re normally consciously thinking about who’s expecting what you soll, right? “
Maybe not consciously, but if someone says “Das soll man nicht machen.” my impulse is to go “Says who?!”. Same as with “darf nicht”.
“In the Ten Commandments (and other biblical commands), there’s actually no modal verb in the Hebrew – just the negative particle lo’ and the verb in the imperfect, which kind of covers future and various modal/subjunctive sort of functions.”
Wow, interesting. So basically it’s a bit like a (not) to do list? Like “not stealing, not coveting someone else’s wife, ….”? Or like a “no loitering” kind of sign thing?
“Man soll das so machen.”
“Says who??”
“Man.”
…
I’m not at all enough of an expert to know exactly the force of the Hebrew. Grammatically, at any rate, the commands are definitely second person singular, so it doesn’t feel to me nearly as impersonal as “no loitering” or a “(not-)to-do list.” It’s clearly “Du sollst nicht stehlen” and not “Man soll nicht stehlen” (let alone “Stehlen verboten” or something).
For that matter, it’s also clearly “du” and not “ihr” for these kind of foundational rules.
There are also casuistic laws, where it’s “If a person does xyz, this is the penalty/procedure…”
It’s one of those things that makes you wonder whether there’s influence from the Bible on German and English, whether they would have phrased laws/commandments differently in the pre-Christian era, or whether “thou shalt (not) / du sollst (nicht)” would have been the default anyway.
The Septuagint (~2nd century BC Greek translation) uses the negative particle that negates the indicative (there’s a different one for negating subjunctive or imperative) plus the future indicative to translate those.
So maybe the closest in term of pure “tense+mood+mode” or whatever would be “Du stiehlst nicht!”? Like… just a statement about what “you” is not doing.
I wonder how many fierce debates were held over how to best translate these things throughout the centuries :). And it’s interesting also that there seems to be consensus now. Where is the person going like “ACTUALLY, the Hebrew original was this and that and so we should say it this and that way ad blah blah blah.”
Well, as I understand it, it’s definitely got a clear imperative force. So I don’t think you can do better than “Du sollst nicht.” I mean, how would you read the difference between “Du sollst nicht stehlen” and “Stiehl nicht!” in German?
It’s just that that imperfect form kind of covers both future and a lot of modal ground. And actually you see it seeming to indicate a “used to” sort of thing, repeated/typical action in the past.
For “you do not steal/are not stealing,” I’d expect to see yet another negative particle (this one often means “there is/are not”) plus a participle. It would sound like “Du bist kein Stehlender,” at least in terms of the closest German equivalents, but I think it would feel much more present, not substantival.
“Du sollst nicht stehlen” vs “Stiel nicht”… oh that’s very different in my mind, especially if we factor out the fact that the first one cometh from God.
The first one quite literally makes me go “Says who?”. I’m immediately defiant and will take that out on the messenger without having to confront the actual rule maker.
Whereas “Stiel nicht” is super direct. The “oppressor” is in front of me and I have to either stand up or back down.
“Du stiehlst nicht!”
In the right context, this can sound very “authoritative”. If a store had this as sign, I would be a bit uncertain. Like… “how are they so confident? I better not steal here.”
But how is it? Were these translations a matter of heavy debate at some point or did they just kind of settle on one way rather quickly?
To my knowledge, there’s never been any controversy about the translation – it’s just interesting to compare how different kinds of commands or requirements are expressed in different languages.
If I had to guess, I’d say (at least ancient) Hebrew had a lot less discomfort with personal-sounding (that 2nd-person singular) commands than we tend to in the modern West. We’re just more used to kind of de-personalized forms like “man soll nicht stehlen” or “Stehlen verboten.” There are quite a lot of places where biblical Hebrew’s idioms and expressions sound more concrete and personal than those in German and English.
Or:
“Ach naja, was soll’s! = Aehh, what’s the good [anyway]!
This though is exceedingly colloquial, I would say.
The last question in the quiz (“Maria sagt, ich soll um 7 zuhause sein.” ) isn’t responding for me.
That must be a glitch. Could you try again?
Same for me…
So does it just freeze up? Does it show the answer at all? Could you tell me what exactly happens and also what device you’re on with what browser? That might be a UI issue actually, but I’d need some more info.
I’m hoping there’s a unanimous agreement with this in English … however, and yes, the German meaning of ‘soll’ as in someone told me to was new to me… nevertheless, in having understood this, I believe I’ve found, and personally use, a possible expression in english that carries the same meaning in german, with respect to a usage and translation. A variant of the indicated translation “I have to get up at 6.” (somone told me to do it.) But, more directly in English to what many use and has a very similar meaning using the word “suppose”, as in: “I’m supposed to get up at 6.” with supposed: as in “presumed,” “intended,” “expected,” or “obliged”. Which I believe is very close in intention to the German meaning, with perhaps the English slant or perspective included. IMHO. :-) FYI ;-)
TBH, the “supposed to” meaning is how I’ve understood it as well.
Yup, that’s a good match. I just wanted to be more descriptive in the post and use a broader variety of translations.
I have the same impression as Chip. Emanuel , do you agree?
Yes, absolutely.
“to be supposed to” is a great way to capture “sollen”. I usually use that as a translation actually, I just wanted to be a bit more descriptive in the article and “someone wanting me to do something” also captures uses like “Soll ich Bier mitbringen?” – “Do you want me to bring beer?”. The same question with “supposed to” sounds a bit different in tone, at least to me.
I’ve been studying German for a while now, and I must say (ha!) this was probably your most useful article for me ever – and you’ve written a lot of useful articles. And by the way, turn off the digression alarm. I love following the rambles.
Wow, thanks for the great feedback and happy to hear that the rambles are appreciated. It makes writing so much more fun sometimes.