
Hello everyone,
and welcome to our German Word of the Day, this time with a look at:
The Meaning of “lassen”
Sometimes it’s to let, sometimes it’s to leave, and sometimes it’s used for some kind of passive voice or like a modal verb.
Definitely one of the more confusing verbs for learners.
And let’s not forget about its various prefix versions, like verlassen (to leave) or auslassen (to skip) and more.
In this lesson, we’ll learn all about all of that. What meanings there are, how they make sense and of course how to use the lassen-family like an absolute boss.
This is quite a huge topic though, so we’ll split the lesson into two parts and leave all the prefix versions for part two.
Today, in part one, we’ll focus on lassen itself.
So we’ll find the core idea and see how its various uses relate to that.
And that includes this weird thing called Passiv-Ersatzform that you come across in B2 courses.
So… are you ready to dive in?
Then lasst uns anfangen.
Let’s go.
***
The core idea of ‘lassen’
The origin of lassen is the disrespectfully ancient Indo-European root *lē(i)-. This root carried an idea of to let go, to slacken but I think an image might capture it best:
letting the air out of a balloon
Pffffffffrrrrrrrrrrt… and you’re left with a flabby piece of rubber.
This root grew into a pretty large word tree with branches in many languages. In English for example, we have the direct brother of lassen, to let.
But also late and last are part of the family, and they’re are based on the idea of weak or slow travelling… low energy travelling if you will.
Other relatives are for examples lax and lazy which mean that we don’t invest much energy into something, and to relax which is all about removing tension from a system. And tension is just a form of energy.
And this notion of little or no energy is actually really helpful for explaining lassen. If we make that into a verb, we could say “investing no energy into something” and that is kind of similar to the simple idea of
“not doing something”
That’s the core of lassen and as you’ll see now in our little tour, all the various uses of the verb are actually just different angles of that idea.
So let’s take a look.
‘lassen’ – A tour of its Meanings
And we’ll start with the core idea itself, because lassen is indeed often used as literally not doing something, as opposed to doing it.
lassen for “not doing”
Think of it as the opposite of machen.
- “Mein Gott, deine Suppe ist ein Salzmonster.”
“Ja, ich glaube ich lasse das Kochen lieber.” - “My god, Your soup is a salt monster.”
“Yeah… I think I’m not gonna leave/stop/”not do” the cooking.” - Practice pronunciation – click once to start recording and again to stop
- Eigentlich wollte ich heute Abend Fußball spielen gehen, aber ich glaube ich lass das lieber. Mein Knie tut weh.
- Originally I wanted to go play soccer tonight but I think I’m not going to do it. My knee hurts.
- Practice pronunciation – click once to start recording and again to stop
- Lass das!
- Stop that/Don’t do that!
- Practice pronunciation – click once to start recording and again to stop
- Lass es.
- Don’t do it. Don’t bother.
- Practice pronunciation – click once to start recording and again to stop
If you’re wondering about the difference between the last two… the es sounds less direct and focused (and harsh). You’d use the first if you kid was messing with your phone for example and the second if you’re friend, who recently broke up, ponders calling the ex again and you think it’s a waste of time (and energy).
Cool. So one aspect of lassen is the idea of not doing something. That’s pretty general, actually, and all the others are kind of a sub-group of that.
Like the next one: the idea of not changing something.
‘lassen’ for ‘not changing’
Or in other words: leaving things as they are.
This is can be used in the sense of not changing a state…
- Ich lasse das Bild, wie es ist.
- I leave the picture as it is.
- Practice pronunciation – click once to start recording and again to stop
- Lass mich in Ruhe!
- Leave me alone!
- Practice pronunciation – click once to start recording and again to stop
- Because the weather is so good, I’m leaving the window open while I’m out of the house.
- Weil das Wetter so gut ist, lasse ich das Fenster auf, während ich weg bin.
but also in a sense of not taking away…
- “Ich hab’ Eintopf gemacht. Willst du was?”
“Ne, ich muss los, aber lass mir was übrig.” - “I’ve made a stew. You want some?
“No, I gotta go, but leave some for me, please.” - Practice pronunciation – click once to start recording and again to stop
- Maria mag Thomas, weil er ihr ihre Freiheiten lässt.
- Maria likes Thomas because he gives her her space.
- Practice pronunciation – click once to start recording and again to stop
… and it also works in combination with activities.
- Ich lasse meine Haare wachsen.
- I grow out my hair.
- Ich lasse meine Sachen überall in der Wohnung rumliegen.
- I leave my things lying all over the apartment.
- Practice pronunciation – click once to start recording and again to stop
And here, it actually seamlessly blends with the next aspect of lassen – the idea of not preventing something.
‘lassen’ for ‘allowing’
Non-doing can of course also mean not doing something against something. And if you don’t prevent something, you basically allow it. Or in other words, you let it happen.
This is basically how to let got its meaning, but unlike lassen, it lost all the other aspects and fully focused on this idea of permission or leaving be.
- Lass mich rein.
- Let me in.
- Practice pronunciation – click once to start recording and again to stop
- Mich hat heute im Supermarkt jemand vorgelassen…. voll nett.
- Someone let me go ahead in the supermarket line today… so nice.
- Practice pronunciation – click once to start recording and again to stop
- Ich lasse mich nicht verarschen.
- I won’t let people bullshit me.
- Practice pronunciation – click once to start recording and again to stop
- Lass mich gehen.
- Let me go.
As you can see in the last examples, we do not need a zu in German to connect a second verb to lassen. That’s a bit special because lassen is not a modal verb, but it’s the same grammar as in English, so it should feel natural actually.
What’s less natural are some of the more figurative uses of this lassen …
- Ich lasse das Glas fallen.
- I drop the glass.
I let the glass fall (lit.) - Practice pronunciation – click once to start recording and again to stop
- Die Kritiken lassen auf einen guten Film hoffen.
- The reviews suggest it’s going to be a good movie.
The reviews allow hope for a good movie (lit.) - Practice pronunciation – click once to start recording and again to stop
- Ich lasse mir die herablassende Art von meinem Chef nicht länger gefallen.
- I won’t let the condescending attitude of my boss “please” me any longer.(lit).
- I won’t take/accept the condescending attitude of my boss any longer.
(this must seem really odd but it’s very common. Maybe just take it as a fixed idiom) - Practice pronunciation – click once to start recording and again to stop
- “Ich komme 5 Minuten zu spät.”
“Lass dir Zeit, ich bin eh noch nicht fertig.. - “I’ll be 5 minutes late.”
“Allow yourself some time… (lit.)”
“Take your time, I’m not ready yet anyway. ”
- Practice pronunciation – click once to start recording and again to stop
As you can see, to let is not a translation in these, but I think the core idea of permission is still pretty present.
And the two verbs line up again in the following, very common kind of statements:
- “Lass uns ein Bier trinken.”
- “Let‘s have a beer.”
- Practice pronunciation – click once to start recording and again to stop
This is about inviting and initiating, so it’s actually a call to PUT IN energy. And that doesn’t really seem to fit in with the base idea of not putting in energy. But if we think of it as a kind of “Allow the momentum.” then it fits perfectly.
The phrase isn’t as common in German as it is in English, but still, it’s pretty common and works with all kinds of verbs.
Including lassen itself :).
- Lass es uns lassen.
- Practice pronunciation – click once to start recording and again to stop
Yes, we really do say that :). And it brings us full circle to the beginning of our tour because it basically means
- Let’s not do it.
All right.
So this was our little tour along the different ideas that we can express with lassen. And I hope you could see that they actually aren’t that different but just different aspects of a base idea of not putting in energy.
Here’s a quick recap of the ideas we had so far:
- not doing something
- not changing (leaving, letting be)
- not preventing (letting)
- inviting (let’s go)
Note that There’s one idea that is completely missing: the idea of LEAVING in the sense of NOT STAYING.
That’s because it’s NOT a meaning of lassen. Instead, we need a prefix version for it.
But we’ll talk about those in part two.
For now, we’ll need to talk about one more aspect of lassen itself. One that doesn’t really seem to fit in with the rest.
‘lassen’ – Having Something Done
Take the following little dialogue.
Location: random kitchen in a shared flat.
Time: dinner party, the next morning:
“Thomas…. feel free to help with the dishes.”
“I appreciate the freedom to help, dude!” (heads for the PlayStation)
“Hey uhm… that’s actually not how I meant it.”
I think you all understood the problem in this little conversation. The first statement wasn’t about freedom of choice. This was a demand in disguise.
Many phrasings that talk about permission or opportunity (like may or could) can be used that way. And so it’s no surprise that lassen can do it, too.
- Emanuel lässt seine Praktikanten hohe Schuhe tragen.
This sentence can actually mean two things. One is that I allows them to wear heels. The other is that I have them wear them.
- Emanuel lets/has his interns wear heels.
In this case, it’s the first one. I would never make them wear heels. I mean, except this one time when they put too much sugar in my coffee… anyway, here’s a couple
- Der König lässt seine Diener kommen.
- The king calls for his servants./has his servants show up.
- Practice pronunciation – click once to start recording and again to stop
- Maria lässt Thomas warten.
- Maria makes Thomas wait.
- Practice pronunciation – click once to start recording and again to stop
And while these are about actually “making” something happen, this lassen is also used in a more toned down sense of getting a service.
- Am Freitag lasse mir die Haare schneiden.
- I’ll get a haircut on Friday.
- Practice pronunciation – click once to start recording and again to stop
- Ich lasse mein Fahrrad reparieren
- I’m having my bike repaired [by someone]
- Practice pronunciation – click once to start recording and again to stop
And this type of phrasing actually doesn’t sound bossy at all and it’s much less “demanding” than “have someone do something“.
And it’s really really really common, so let’s look at a few more examples.
- Ich lasse mir morgen die Fälle erklären.
- I’ll have someone explain the cases to me.
- Practice pronunciation – click once to start recording and again to stop
- Ich lasse mir die Rechnung bringen.
- I’m having the waiter bring the bill.(lit)
- Practice pronunciation – click once to start recording and again to stop
- Ich lasse mich morgen massieren.
- I’ll have someone massage me tomorrow…. sounds odd and demanding
- I’ll get a massage tomorrow… this is how the German sentence feels.
- Practice pronunciation – click once to start recording and again to stop
- Ich lasse mich scheiden.
- I’m getting a divorce.
- Practice pronunciation – click once to start recording and again to stop
- Kann ich mir Mandelmilch verschreiben lassen?
- Can I have almond milk prescribed to me? (lit.)
- Can I get a prescription for almond milk?
- Practice pronunciation – click once to start recording and again to stop
All right.
Now, we already have quite a bit of input but there’s one more thing I want to talk about, just because it ties in so well with all we’ve learned.
I am talking about what in textbooks and course is often referred to as
“Passiversatzform für Passiv mit Modalverb ‘können'”
which roughly translates to “Term that no German has ever heard of”.
Seriously, people usually do not know that term. It sure sounds very complicated and B2-ish, but it’s actually not difficult at all. Because it’s just a natural byproduct of using lassen with a self reference.
The Meanings of ‘sich (nicht) lassen’
Take this example:
- Das Einhorn lässt sich streicheln.
This means that the unicorn allows us to pet it. Or literally, it allows itself petting.
Okay, this example is nonsense of course, because unicorns HATE human hands on their fur.
But anyway, if we now change the example and use a mere object like a door and the verb to open, we get this:
- Die Tür lässt sich öffnen.
- Practice pronunciation – click once to start recording and again to stop
And this basically means that the door can be opened. And THAT’S why the German phrasing sich lassen is called Passiversatzform…. because it can replace a proper passive form with werden.
- Something can be done.
- Etwas kann gemacht werden.
- Etwas lässt sich machen.
The name Passiversatzform might sound a bit intimidating, but it’s nothing special. There’s always more than one way to express an idea and many languages have ways to express the notion of a passive without the grammatical passive.
Actually, I think it’s not very helpful to focus on that too much, though.
Take a look at these examples:
- Das Licht lässt sich nicht dimmen.
- You can’t dim the light./The light ain’t dimmable.
(these -able forms would be called Passiversatzform in German, too)
- Practice pronunciation – click once to start recording and again to stop
- Die Fliege lässt sich nicht fangen.
- The fly can’t be caught.
- Practice pronunciation – click once to start recording and again to stop
- Die Katze lässt sich nicht streicheln.
- The cat won’t let people pet it.
- Practice pronunciation – click once to start recording and again to stop
- Thomas lässt sich nicht aus der Ruhe bringen.
- Thomas can’t be fazed easily/isn’t easy to faze.
- Practice pronunciation – click once to start recording and again to stop
I mean… where does “can be done” (a grammatical passive) end and lets you do (not a passive) start? All these sentence are the exact same phrasing but would they all be called Passelaffufforms? No.
This sich lassen phrasing is really just the plain straight-forward allow-meaning of lassen combined with a self reference. And in certain contexts, this can express the same thing that a passive would express.
Here are a few more really common uses…
- Das lässt sich nicht mit Sicherheit sagen.
- That can’t be said for sure.
- Practice pronunciation – click once to start recording and again to stop
- Das lässt sich nicht ändern.
- That’s just how it is.
- Practice pronunciation – click once to start recording and again to stop
- Über Geschmack lässt sich (nicht) streiten.
- There is no accounting for taste.
- Practice pronunciation – click once to start recording and again to stop
- Das Ergebnis kann sich sehen lassen.
- Lit.: The result it can allow for itself to be seen (because it is good enough).
- The result is impressive.
- Practice pronunciation – click once to start recording and again to stop
Now, there are lots of common phrasings with lassen but if you have a question about one of them, we can always clear it up in the comments. For today, we’ve done enough, I think. And next time, in the second part, we’ll face the swarm. Dun dunn dunnn.
I can already see it in the distance. A dark menacing cloud. Prefixes. Many, many prefixes. But…. the cloud’s not here yet so… uhm… I guess we’ll have to wait for part two :).
Anyway, I hope you got a good impression of what lassen is used for, and more importantly, how it all connects. If you want to check how much you remember, just take the little quiz I will have prepared at some point… after the summer of 2020 is over probably :D.
If you have any questions about lassen so far or if you want to try out some examples just leave me a comment.
I hope you liked it and see you next time.
Find part two here:

good article
I was so impressed by how beatifully you explained this I felt compelled to leave a comment. Fantastic article!
Thanks a lot :)!!
It feels like ‘the light is not allowing itself to be dimmed’…
is that the feeling in a round-about way?
You mean for “Das Licht lässt sich nicht dimmen.”?
Yeah, that the literal translation and kind of also captures the sense.
I encountered this sentence “Aufgaben lassen sich alle oder weitestgehend auch im Home-Office ausführen” and I was totally confused.
Now I learned from your article. it should mean: You can excecute the every or most aufgabe in home office. Thx for the article, it helps a LOT!
Happy to hear that :). Danke!!
I have been dipping into the writings of Georg Trakl and just came across a sentence that reminded me of your article.
“er lasst (sic) euch sagen ob ihr schreibfaul geworden seid?”
This threw me for a minute but then I remembered this article and its basically like your example with the king right?
“He requests you say if you have got lazy about writing?”
I mean i first thought it might be “he leaves it up to you to say if you got lazy about writing” but this makes less sense with the question mark.
Without the question mark it would have some of the abiguity that your example with allowing /ordering people wear high heals has ?
I’d need more context to say for sure. As it stands, it can mean two things:
1) He has someone tell you “ob” (sounds wrong to me, but with Austria you never know)…
2) He tells you to say “ob” …
Those were the meanings that came to my mind, but actually, your option with him giving us the choice ALSO works.
So yeah… I’d need the surrounding text to know what he means.
Liebe Mitzi!
Verzeihe dass ich dir so lange nicht geschrieben habe. Ich habe 5 Karten von Willi bekommen. Er lasst euch sagen ob ihr schreibfaul geworden seid? Mir hast du auch noch nie geschrieben. Es grüsst dich dein Schorschl.
So based on your first suggestion Willi has Georg ask if they have become lazy about writing?
I mean, in english if i am understanding correctly,both your examples would be covered by “he requests you say” because in both cases the information is being conveyed indirectly.
That said if you really wanted to include the distinction to emphasise Willi is having someone convey the info…
1) he asked me to ask you whether…
2) he asks you to say whether…
I wanted to make a minor edit to this but apparently i am posting comments too quickly…
Ugh… this seems to be a new security feature of the comment system. I don’t really have an influence on that unfortunately :/
Oh, that’s interesting.
So in this context, within this old writing style, I read it as … get ready…
– He wants to know/He wants me to ask you/ He’s wondering if..
It’s a mix between a question and a complaint, but it’s not a way I would use “lassen” in modern German.
Intersting… thanks…thinking about it I guess something like “he would have you say” would encompass those options to some extent…. (?) i mean that sounds old school and fancy but that’s the vibe
That’s something only you can tell as an English native speaker, I think. If it sounds old school and fancy, then that’s a good match.
If it’s also something someone might have written that way in that time period then it’s perfect :)
In standard German this would be the common expression: er lässt euch sagen oder ausrichten, ob ihr …
Emglish: he’s letting you know whether …
Yeah, exactly. The only difference that here the “message” is actually a question.
Interesting article. I read a definition once that stated: ‘you can only use ‘sich lassen’ when it’s something that is done to the person and not something that is done to an object the person owns.’
But then it should be wrong to say: ich lasse mir die Tür öffnen; or: ich lasse mir das Auto reparieren. Still, there seems a slight difference in focus between, ‘ich lasse mir das Auto reparieren’ and ‘ich lasse das Auto reparieren’. Also between ‘Ich lasse die Tür öffnen’ and ‘ich lasse mir die Tür öffnen’.
Also: ich lasse meine Haare waschen and ich lasse mir meine Haare waschen. The focus seems to be more on the subject, even though the action is performed on the object. Or would it be categorically wrong to use the ‘mir’ here?
Interesting question!
The definition you read is … uh… nonsense
I think what they’re trying to say is that the direct object of this phrasing can’t be a person.
However, that’s just a trend, not a rule.
This is grammatically correct.
So that’s problem number one and problem number two is that “sich lassen” is not really a thing. They make it sound like it’s a reflexive phrase, but as you have noted correctly, it’s NOT.
This is the same phrasing, only that in the second version we’ve added a self reference to make it sound personal.
In this example, it does make theoretical difference in meaning, but in the following one, it doesn’t:
All mean the same. I would call the second one as the most idiomatic, because German tends to use “mir/sich” + “definite article” for body related things.
Both are correct and mean the same, but the second one is just way more idiomatic.
I hope this helps :)
Thank you so much! This makes a lot of sense.
Sorry for double questions.
Thomas lässt sich vom Kellner den Weg erklären.
If I were to write this in werden form:
Thomas wird vom Kellner den Weg erklärt.
It seems very weird here. Which makes me think this is more of a notion of service rather than passive.
Your second version indeed does not work at all.
Grammatically, this lassen-version is NOT a passive.
The closest translation is
– Thomas has the waiter explain the way to him.
The sky can’t be green:
Der Himmel kann sich nicht grün sein lassen
why wouldn’t this work here? I would 100% never say this but just want to understand.
Could you give me some background about how you came up with this German phrasing? Is it based on something in this article? Or something you found online?
Translated it would be:
– The sky can’t let itself be green.
Which doesn’t really make a whole lot of sense.
Well it was from the test, about if the “sky can’t be green” is a notion of lassen. While solving that I was thinking how would I say that with lassen. So I got convinced that this would be okay to say as I wrote it, but yeah at deeper inspection it makes no sense.
Ok – this is a difficult verb for me so apologize if this sentence is obvious but does
Sie sollte es lassen mir so etwas anzubieten
fall under the stop that/don’t do that! construction?
Thx
Yup, it’s like
A bit like “Knock it of!” but as a normal sentence.
Think of it as “I let myself be separated”. It’s a direct object.
It doesn’t make sense with “mir”.
ok thanks
Good afternoon
I am struggling to get my head around the word order here ( I am only an A1 so have pity)
I did think to have a browse through the comments to see if you had already answered ( couple of hours later) but didn’t find it
My first glance translation was that someone HAD LET YOU go ahead
I was expecting something alog the lines of ..
Ich habe Heute im Supermarkt jemand vorgelassen
Any advice would be welcome and thanks for your time
I’m not 100% sure what your confused about – is it the use of tense in English or the “mich” vs “ich” in German or the word order?
The subject in my sentence is “someone” – the person who let me skip ahead.
I am the direct object, so we need accusative. That’s why it is “mich”.
The thing with German word order is that it’s a lot more flexible than in English.
Those mean the same thing. In both of them, the subject is “jemand” and I am the one allowed to go forth.
Let me know if that’s what you were unsure about or tell me what you need help with :)
Well written!! Thx – to reinforce my understanding the following sentences :
Lass mich nicht luegen
Lass mich nicht vergessen
Have the notion of don’t let me…lie/forget
Yes, but the exact translation depends on context. It’s a bit different for each of the verbs.
Hallo – Beste Erklaerung von “lassen”, die ich je gelesen habe!! Das duale Konzept von Erlaubnis und Zwang war ausgezeichnet. Das hat wirklich geholfen, einen Satz wie diesen zu erklaeren, die ich gelesen habe:
Mein Vater hat mich das ganze Wochende ueber im Garten arbeiten lassen.
Und je nach Kontext koennte es in beide Richtung gehen- er gab mir die Erlaubnis oder er zwang mich im Garten zu arbeiten..
Nochmals vielen Dank fuer den tollen Artikel!!
Hey :)
Warum ist es manchmal “lassen mir” und manchmal “lassen mich”?
Das hängt vom Kontext und dem Rest des Satzes ab. Da gibt es nicht “die eine” Antwort.
Wenn du mir Beispiele gibtst, dann kann ich dir die erklären.
This blog is the greatest! I’m learning Deutsch in the most enjoyable, sensible, and organized fashion, by way of help through community support. Ich danke allen auf der ganze Welt. Viel zu genießen!
Viel Spaß :)!!
Wow, your lesson helped me very much. I’m constantly doing some exercises and now I’ve stumbled upon one, where I’m having some difficulties. I have 3 sentences here:
1) Die Eltern lassen die Kinder zu Hause bleiben. (Parents order/command kids to stay home)
2) Um wie viel Uhr hast du dich wecken lassen? (at what hour have you ordered/commanded to wake you up?)
3) Er hat sich überholen lassen. (He let (us/me) overtake him)
What would these sentences look like, if I would like to say:
1) Parents let their children stay home (picture a school day and children don’t want to go to school)
2) At what hour have you let (him/her/me) wake you up?
3) He ordered/commanded us to overtake him
?
Vielen Dank im Voraus!
Thankyou! another German mystery solved!
Freut mich zu hören :)
A quick question on the “let’s do something” Lassen. In one of your examples, you have “Lass es uns machen.” To me, that matches what we say in English, 3rd person “let” with “es” as a filler subject. But I’ve seen other sentences where it looks like one is speaking to Du, eg Lass uns machen or to Sie, Lassen Sie uns machen or Ihr, Lasst uns machen. Should I be conjugating for the person I’m speaking to? Or is it always “lass” no matter what? Thanks for your help. I love this blog !
Great question!
Yes, conjugating is generally a good idea. So when you talk to someone in formal register it is
– Lassen Sie uns….
although those instances will be rare, since this lassen-use is colloquial.
For one person it is
– Lass uns…
You can also use that for a group though. Only if you want to put extra emphasis on the group, you can use
– Lasst uns…
I don’t think I use that very often though.
hey! I just wanted to say that I use a lot of websites to learn German, but this one ist the best ever!
Cool, danke!! Das freut mich zu hören :)
hi!
your lessons are great !
Lassen is difficult but a lot of fun, if hurting your brain is fun.. it is!
it seems like to let / to allow in english is more straight ahead / less ironic than in german.. in one particular instance in english you wrote above, one does sense the irony of “permission via inaction” – namely ‘let him wait’ –
you translated it as “make him wait” … is that the same thing? kinda, yeah, i think. um…
devilish!
question:
how would you say “I dropped the glass on purpose” in German?
would you need to add an “absichtlich” to the “Ich lasse das Glas fallen.” to show intention?
In English, ‘I let the glass fall’ sounds like one took an active (or passive/aggressive) role in the dropping, along with gravity.
many thanks und
MfG