Grammar Jargon – What the heck are adverbs

adverbsHello everyone,

and welcome to another episode of Grammar Jargon, where we explain one of these cryptic nerdy terms that teachers and textbooks use, because for some strange reason they think it’s … helpful.
Well… IT’S NOT! Stop it!! Stop feeding us stupid, yawn-inducing Latin vocabulary that half the class has no idea what it means, and that no one can remember because it so complicated, and that sucks out all the fun. You hear me? IT SUCKS IT OUT! THE FUN. ALL OF I.. oh… I uh… I think I’m getting a little worked up …. must … breathe.. phaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa…
all right. I’m sorry. I hate jargon.  I really do.
But it’s there, we have to cope. And there are some terms like verb or noun or subject that are so basic, well established and hard to replace that everyone should know them. Today we’ll look at one of those terms. Today, we’ll try to find out, once and for all, just what are


To do that let’s… take a detour and first look at adjectives.
The term adjective comes from old Latin. At the core is the Latin verb iacere which meant to throw or to cast. This is where the word jet comes from by the way. The ad means… well… pretty much the same as at… or add.  So,  adjective literally means something like “thing that is thrown or slapped at stuff” and that is pretty much what they’re used for. Adjectives are like little tags that are added to nouns to give us more information about them.

  • Princess Lyra gazed at the flower.

Sounds interesting…but a bit bland. We need to be a little more descriptive. How is the flower? Beautiful …  and fair. That sounds nice.

  • Princess Lyra gazed at the flower, fair and beautiful as it was.

Sure, I could have just said “the beautiful and fair flower”, but there are different ways to include adjectives into a sentence, and the one I used is just more literararierer. But not literary enough. She just gazes. Princesses don’t just gaze. And that’s where adverbs come in. If adjectives are descriptive tags for nouns, adverbs are tags for… verbs. So … let’s see how she gazes…

  • Dreamily, Lyra gazed at the flower, fair and beautiful as it was; as SHE was. Such beauty, ever so frail. She trembled as she felt the desire to pick it.

Yeah maaan. That’s deep. And layered. It’s from my upcoming novel, by the way; a story about a depressed princess who gets to know the royal forester and is cured by unicorn-therapy… it’s an adult tale. You can pre-order it here. … oh.. sure, sorry.
So adjectives describe stuff, they tell us how something IS. Adverbs describe activities, they tell us how something is DONE. The are added to verbs.

  • The car is fast. (fast functions as an adjective)
  • The car drives fast. (fast functions as an adverb)

That was easy.
But that was also only just a fraction of what adverbs do.
For example, adverbsalso describe adjectives.

  • Lyra sang beautifully(describing verb), while she combed her beautifully (describing adjective) long hair.

And that’s still not all of it. Not even close. There, whenever, therefore, soon, anyway, though … all those are adverbs too. Even even.
Now, how does that make any sense with the added to verb idea we had?
Well… back in the days (in Rome and before that in Greece) verb didn’t just mean verb as we understand it. It comes from the aineshant Indo-European root *were which meant something like to speak and verb was a much more general term for word or even statement. We can still see that in verbal or verbatim and of course word itself, which also comes from that root.
So, an adverb was not only a tag for a verb, it was a quite general information-tag for words or statements.  And that hasn’t changed.

  • I ‘ m     t  y  p i n g    s l o w l y    (describes the verb to type).
  • I   ‘    m              t      y     p    i     n     g            p    a    i      n    f      u       ok, I’ll stop that)  painfully slowly.       (describes the adverb slowly)
  • I am not very funny.     (describes the adjective funny)

And finally, one example for a statement-adverb… or sentence adverb, if you will.

  • Today, Thomas did a huge pile of dishes in 10 minutes.

Yes. Today is an adverb too.  It kind of tags the statement about what Thomas did. Like… Thomas instagrams himself in front of the huge pile and writes

  •  “did all that in 5 minutes” #today #champ

Or let’s take a different example. It’s been pouring down all day, your friends sit at home, wondering what you’re doing, and then you upload a selfie of you in park, soaked but full of glee… #regardless.
Okay…. of  course this tag-analogy has it’s limits. But I hope you get the idea.
The only thing that adverbs CAN’T refer to directly are things and persons (or nouns, if you will). Because if they did that, the moon would explode… okay no, they don’t do that because the Romans were just like:

“Adjectives are for nouns, adverbs for the rest!”
“But… I don’t think that this is what the Greeks had in mind when they developed thes…”
“The old Greeks! The ones that inven… oh wait… I get it.”

So, adverbs can give information about verbs, adjectives, adverbs, sentences and whole statements. That’s quite a bit, and the kinds of information they give is just as  “quite a bit”-y. So let’s make some categories. Actually let’s make a coffee first… hmmm… coffee. I love it.
All right. The first big group are adverbs that give information about how? Let’s call them… how-adverbs. In common English grammar terminatorgy, this group is actually divided into two groups… adverbs of manner and adverbs of degree.

  • He talks slowly.
  • I am very tired.

The first one is pure manner, the second is 100% degree… very just moves up the intensity-slider of tired, if that makes sense. But then, what about badly.

  • He was badly injured.

I mean… that does tell us something about the degree of the injury, doesn’t it. Yet, it’s called a manner-adverb. And barely on the other hand is called a degree-adverb.

  • He was barely injured.

Hodor. That don’t make no sense to me.
Degree-adverb, manner-adverb… they all somehow answer to how and so as far as I’m concerned it’s one group.

  • How beautiful is the flower? Very/really/ incredibly/stunningly beautiful.
  • How does he dance? Elegantly/barely/mesmerizingly.

All right.
The next big group are the  when-adverbs. Again, in the English grammar books I use (i.e. the internet) they make a distinction. Time-adverbs and frequency-adverbs …

  • He does that tomorrow.
  • He does that often.

The first one is time, the second one frequency… but what is always? Or never? or Occasionally? Sure, they talk about frequency but they also answer the question when. They are definitely all related to time, so let’s just call them when-adverbs or time-adverbs. And my god, are there many important ones… today, before, then, later, soon, never, sometimes, seldom, earlier, now, monthly…  in fact, if you learn a new language, some time-adverbs should be among the very first 100 words you learn.
Same for the next big group… the where-adverbs.

  • Here, there, left, right, up, down, forward…

Not much to say. They are tremendously useful, they answer to where, and there are more.
Now, there are a few smaller groups like amount (much, little), or reason (therefor, hence) but the the last BIG group is formed by what I call meta-adverbs.
You see, the ones we had so far added information that integrated into the statement itself, and we can ask for them.

  • How pretty is it?
  • How, where, when did I do something?

Meta-adverbs do other things. They connect a statement with something that has been said before, or they let us know what the speaker’s thought are, or they feed us other rather complex information. In either case, they all kind of transcend the pure account of events.

  • Unfortunately, my boss was really being a dick today. Oddly, he was also kind of smelly.

What happened today? My boss was a dick, and he was smelly. That’s it. That’s what happened. All the stuff the adverbs add is… well… meta. Let’s see… the also connects the second sentence with the first … especially with bit that is implied by unfortunately.  The unfortunately is meta-info about what I think about his being dick and the oddly kind of implies that my boss usually smells nice, AND it can between the lines even imply that him being a dick is rather common in comparison. Not bad at all.  3 little words tell a whole world.
And there are many adverbs like that.

  • Sadly, luckily, too, also, though, however, anyway, regardless…

All right.
So, we’ve seen how-adverb, where-adverb, when-adverbs and a whole bunch of more or less crazy meta-adverbs. Those categories are not “official”, but as a matter of fact, there are no official categories and German has others than English anyway. The groups were really just to give you an idea of what adverbs can do.
Oh and one adverb does not belong to just one group. In fact, an adverb might not even be an adverb all the time. Many little words can have several functions.

  • I put my book on the table.
  • I turn my charm on.

The first on is a preposition, the second one is an adverb. But why?
Well… that brings us to out next question.

Spotting adverbs

Adverbs are eclectic. And because they are, it is hard to say:

“Adverbs look like that, and they do this.”

Now you might be like “Oh, that’s totally fine with me.” and turn away. But it is kind of useful to know when a word is or functions as an adverb. Why? Well… because…. you know… there’s this certain language that tends to have different words for different functions and it also tends to be painfully uptight about that.
So, let’s see how we can recognize adverbs.
The ones that describe other adjectives or adverbs are easy to spot. They are next to them and the connection is apparent.

  • He was almost asleep.

Almost is an adverb because it modifies asleep here and asleep is an adjective because it tells us how he is.
The tricky ones are the adverbs that don’t refer to their neighbor.
But there are two major features that make an adverb. The first one is this:

  1. Adverbs do not refer to or stand for nouns directly

Behold the first example:

  • The tree? Yeah I saw that that.’
    It was not that high.

The first that is a pronoun, because it stands for the tree. It is a what-box, and adverbs cannot be what-boxes. The second that on the other hand, does answer to how? and yet it doesn’t describe a thing and it describes an adjective… high.  So it must be an adverb.
Now, behold the second example:

  • A new bar opened down the street.
    I like it so I go there a lot.

Both words, there and it do refer to the same thing, right? The bar. So that means that there can’t be an adverb here, because we’ve learned that adverbs don’t directly stand for things. BUT… in fact it is NOT directly referring to the bar. Let’s try:

  • I liked the bar and I go the bar a lot.

The first one works, because it is truly just fills in for the bar.Both can be a what-box. There fills in for to the bar. So there stands for information about where. It’s a where-box and the bar is just a part of that.
As a little side note… all those boxes besides the who-box and the what-box, so the where-box and the when-box and the why-box and the with what box, all those smaller or larger chunks that answer one particular question besides who and what are also called…  adverbials.

  • After I was done reading the chapter I flushed.

In “real” grammar, the whole after-part is called a “time adverbial”. It’s the answer to when?. And we can replace that with a time-adverb. Then. In a way, adverbs one-word-adverbasdoiwgqiahlgllllllllllladllllllldllll…  huh? Where am I? …oh…  I … I just fell asleep. Sorry… too much theory.
Where were we? Uh yeah… so two features that adverbs have in common… the first one was that they do not stand for nouns directly, or in other words they cannot answer to who or what.
Now,not all adverbs are boxes and they don’tr always answer to one question. Just remember those crazy meta-adverb.
So, for those, the second feature is really really helpful and you really really need to understand this or German time and place words will be “unlearnable”.

2. Adverbs  don’t have a grammatical function.
They don’t “organize” things grammatically.

Once more, behold the example.

  • Before I eat, I cook.
  • I’ve done it in that order before and it has worked well.

Both befores do order things in time. But the first one also has a grammatical function. It integrates the “I  eat ” into the sentence and makes it a when-box.

  • When do I cook? Before I eat.

I could say when or as or after because they have the same function, but I cannot put another time-adverb in there… like today.

  • Today I eat, I cook.

That is nonsense. Or art. But it is not the same structure as before…*ahem… because the adverb does not job.
Now let’s see with the other sentence…

  • I have done this before and it has worked well.

Does this before introduce or organize anything? No. I can take it out and the structure is still the same.

  • I have done this and it has worked well.

So, in this example before is a when-box alone.

  • When have I done this? Before.

Now, let me say it again… the crucial takeaway is NOT that adverbs are boxes. The point is that they don’t have a grammatical function like conjunctions or prepositions. Adverbs sit in their sentence, convey their message and that’s it. They’re not involved in the “mechanics”.
Actually, let’s do an example with a preposition.

  • Thomas pees behind the tree.
  • The wind comes from behind.

Thomas is lucky. Both behinds do tell us something about spatial relations. But the first one also has some grammar to do… it organizes tree and puts it into a where-box.

  • Where does he pee? Behind the tree.

Now, the second behind doesn’t organize anything. Sure, it completes the from,but it can do that because it is a location… a where-box, alone.

  • From where does the wind come?
  • From behind.

Let’s maybe do one more… with one of these so called phrasal verbs. One last time, behold the example

  • I put on my charm.
  • I  put my book on the table

The sentences look VERY similar but the ons are VERY different. And which one is a an adverb? The first one. Because it does not do any organizing. Sure, without it the sentence would mean something different but the point is not that adverbs don’t have meaning… they don’t have grammatical functions.  They are just meaning-vessels, if you will. The second on on the other hand integrates table and forms a where-box with it.
The first one is free. It can even be moved around.

  • I turn my charm on.
  • On I turn my charm…. (theoretically)

So… again… the point is not that adverbs are boxes themselves. The time-adverbs are and the place adverbs are and if you’re not sure about a word… see if it answers where or when alone. But the main main point is that adverbs … do not  fill in the blanks for you ;)
Ok, seriously, they don’t do any grammar, if that makes sense.

  • I want to do that too.

What is also? It doesn’t refer to a noun, it doesn’t stand for a noun, and nothing depends on it grammar-wise. It’s an adverb.

  • I’m tired though.

Same here.
Adverbs are kind of a when-in-doubt category… all the little words that you cannot tell what they are… try adverb. It’s probably right :).
All right. Now let’s take a quick look at how it is in German and then we can wrap up. Sounds … okay-ish? Awesome.

Adverbs in German

So … the one main difference between German and English is that German does not have an adverb marker like –ly.

  • Er ist langsam
  • He is slow
  • Er läuft langsam
  • He walks slowly

Adverb and adjective look the same. But adverbs don’t only get no special ending in German. They get NO ending. EVER. It’s part of their official definition actually. Adverbs remain unsullied.

  • Ich sehe die unglaubliche schöne Frau.
  • Ich sehe die unglaublich schöne Frau.

The second unglaublich has no ending, so it cannot be an adjective and it cannot refer to the woman. It refers to schön.

  • I see the incredible, beautiful woman.
  • I see the incredibly beautiful woman.

An -e might not be much, you may think, but it does change the rhthymnynm completely,  so every native speaker will always hear it and process it correctly.
Other than that, there are no big differences. German adverbs are every bit as versatile as English ones. It probably doesn’t surprise anyone that German has more adverbs.English tends uses adverbial phrases more often… like that’s why or because of that or for that reason  while German has all these darum, daher, deshalb, deswegen, nämlich, somit etc. Also, German rarely uses the same word for different functions. Before, the adverb is a different word than before, the preposition.
And then, there is of course the whole location thing not even think about location… hierin, dahin, hierher, daher, dorthin, hinauf, herunter, hinunter.
Boy… German really does have many adverbs. Well… at least German doesn’t have phrasal verbs, right? But German has prefixes. And guess what a prefix is once it has detached from the “mother ship”…

  • Ich mache das Fenster auf.

Let’s do the checklist…

  • Doesn’t directly refer to a thing or person?    √    Check
  • Doesn’t have grammatical function/doesn’t organize things grammatically?    √  Check
  • Does it carry content?   √  Check   (just made that question up)

It must be an adverb. Just like it was with the phrasal verbs. So wait… does that mean that phrasal verbs and prefix verbs are actually the sa… but I digress.

All right. Recap-time.
Adverbs are little cutsy putsy words that give us addition information about verbs, adjectives, other adverbs, side-sentences or full statements. The information is mainly about how, when and where but there are adverb-answers for all questions (except who and what) and then there is this HUGE group of meta-adverbs. Those tell us something about what the speaker thinks, they connect a sentence content-wise to something that has been said before, or they can evoke crazy implications that our stupid computers will never ever understand.
Recognizing adverbs is not simple because they are so divers, but it’s not hard either… they don’t directly refer to nouns and they don’t have a grammatical/organisational function. They just give information. But that, they’re good at.
And to show you just how good they are, I will go ahead and answer all your questions with only adverbs. Nah… just kidding. They’re not THAT powerful. Anyway, please please let me know if this helped you understanding adverbs a little better or if you’re more confused than before. And of course, if you have any questions or suggestion about adverbs or this post…  just go ahead and leave me a comment.
I hope you liked it and see you next time.

4.8 10 votes
Article Rating

Newsletter for free?!

Sign up to my epic newsletter and get notified whenever I post something new :)
(roughly once per week)

No Spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

Your Thoughts and Questions

Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
6 months ago

Are there rules as to placement of the adverbs? I got this sentence wrong on Duolingo “Do you know when the band is playing in Egypt again?”Translation:Weißt du, wann die Band wieder in Ägypten spielt?
I put the “wieder” in front of spielt.

6 months ago
Reply to  Emanuel

Thanks, I will definitely read that.

1 year ago

When I read unsullied, I was like Dovoghedhi, (Game of Thrones). Anyone else? :D

Prakhar Gyawali
Prakhar Gyawali
2 years ago

can adverbs be sometimes ignored in german language? for example in the sentence “Die Außerirdischen können nicht nur durch die Zeit, sondern auch durch Dimensionen reisen.” Can the “durch” in the second clause be omitted and carried over implicitly from the first so that it makes this sentence?“Die Außerirdischen können nicht nur durch die Zeit, sondern auch Dimensionen reisen.”

Napay 1
Napay 1
3 years ago


I have spent the last 5 days or more trying to undertand the german adverbs (my mother tongue is spanish for that matter). I have checked far ans wide. I even have a quote from Eisenberg saying that the german adverbs are the most darkest challenge that the german language has to offer.
Nevertheless any author, big or small convinced me to use their way to structure and understand this subject, until you.

Meta-adverbs will be official, you have a new disciple now.

I’ll be back to this page from time to time.

Please let me know where do I left my 5 stars, like and everything else

Julian Koch
Julian Koch
3 years ago

Vielen Danke for this article! I really have problems sometimes to distinguish between adjectives and adverbs.. and also to get them into the right position and a sentence. But you really explained it really well….. Just a suggestion.. mabye you could add some more graphics as on . So, thanks again and greetings!

3 years ago

Hey, consider the following sentence,

Ergänzed Sie in der Tabelle rechts

is rechts here an adverb?

3 years ago
Reply to  A.Imtinan

Hey man, please answer my question above.

3 years ago
Reply to  Emanuel

Thanks, no problem. But isn’t “rechts” describing “Tabelle” here so shouldn’t it be adjective?

3 years ago
Reply to  A.Imtinan

Adverb is that which describes a verb. I can’t find “rechts” here describing “Ergänzen” anyway. Rather it’s describing “Tabelle”. Consider the following,

-Ergänzen Sie in der Tabelle
– welche(or “welcher”?) Tabelle?
-rechte Tabelle

than again that begs the question why isn’t “rechts” declined.

3 years ago
Reply to  A.Imtinan

Thanks, things just got a bit complicated. Adverbs describes more than verbs. I know it describes adjectives and adverbs too in english & I guess it does the same in german. Can u refer me some material to read further to clear up the concept?

4 years ago

Ich bin sehr dumm. Du hast mich vor den Kisten verloren.

Aleisha Kudrass
6 years ago

Thank you very much for the very helpful post

Aleisha Kudrass
6 years ago

Phrasal verbs versus prefix verbs… did I understand the hint correctly that there is a post on this somewhere?

Aleisha Kudrass
6 years ago

What is the name of this post and where can it be found on your website? I can only find it be directly searching in google, just wondering if I’m missing something…

Aleisha Kudrass
6 years ago

I’ll have to come back and read this article again tomorrow. Brain explosion.

7 years ago

Thank you soooo much for your blog. It is immensely helpful and very entertaining to boot. I am a native English speaker learning German and struggle to put those pesky adverbs in their place. They just dance around my sentences sticking their tongues out and making rude gestures. Anyway, I was wondering if you had any tips for the proper word order of German adverbs within a sentence? I often seem to put them in the wrong spot. Thanks again!!
7 years ago

FUCK YOU AND YOUR SITE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Grateful Reader
Grateful Reader
8 years ago

Ein paar Trickfragen.

Ist “das Drum und Dran” ein Wort? Ist “das zu Hause” ein Wort?

Ist “hin und hergehen” ein Verb mit 2 Präfixen oder 2 Verben?

Grateful Reader
Grateful Reader
8 years ago
Reply to  Emanuel

“Also… “das Zuhause” ist ein Nomen. Da herrst glaub ich weitestgehend konsens :).”

Ich hab mehrmals die getrennte Version – “das zu Hause” – gesehen. Das bedeutet vermutlich, dass ein Substantiv aus 2 Wörtern bestehen kann…

“Für “Drum und Dran”… keine Ahnung. Ich würde mal sagen, dass es offiziell zwei Substantive sind… “das Drum” und “das Dran”. Das würde zumindest Sinn machen.”

Aber dann wäre es auch das Drum und das Dran oder…
Duden sagt zumindest, es sei ein Substantiv.

“Drum und Dran, das
Wortart: Substantiv, Neutrum”

Grateful Reader
Grateful Reader
8 years ago
Reply to  Emanuel

Also, wenn die Leute so schreiben, wieso ist es falsch? Du hast doch gesagt, dass die Sprache den Leuten gehört, und nicht dem Duden usw. :P

Grateful Reader
Grateful Reader
8 years ago
Reply to  Emanuel

Ich habe einmal einen Kompaktkurs Deutsch-C1 bei Goethe-Institut in Deutschland besucht, und genau da habe ich erfahren, dass es 2 Varianten gibt: im Text stand “das zu Hause”, “das Zuhause” wurde als die zweite Variante angegeben. Also, wenn es bei GI geht, ist es meiner Meinung nach kein Fehler, auch wenn die getrennt geschriebene Variante als Standard gilt.

Grateful Reader
Grateful Reader
8 years ago

Ach, Adverbien…
Ne Frage über “herüber”.

Ich ging über die Strasse herüber.
Ich ging über die Strasse.
So wie ich es sehe: Ersteres ist eher vollendet, während es sich bei Letzterem auch um einen Vorgang gehen kann. Ich weiß, dass es höchstwahrscheinlcih nicht stimmt, aber diese sind meine unwillkürlichen Assoziationen.

Gibts einen Unterschied?

Bei “herüber” kriege ich immer Probleme. Könntest du ein paar Beispiele zum Gebrauch anführen?

Grateful Reader
Grateful Reader
8 years ago
Reply to  Emanuel

Es ist gut zu wissen. Aber wird es bei “komm zu mir” nicht schon angenommen, dass man von gegenüber nach hier kommt? Ich meine, ist “über” hier nicht überflussig?

Grateful Reader
Grateful Reader
8 years ago
Reply to  Emanuel

Impliziert “herüber”, dass sich der Sprecher und der Zuhörer, voneinander entfernt, auf ungefähr derselben Ebene befinden?

Grateful Reader
Grateful Reader
8 years ago
Reply to  Emanuel

“Es gibt leckeres Eis in diesem neuen Cafe. Willst du rübergehen?” – geht das?

8 years ago

I have always appreciated your site for providing such knowledgeable posts on German language. These posts are always useful for people learning German language.

8 years ago

Very helpful as usuel funny comparison betwween English and German Adverbs . Till the next post, Aufwiedersehen!

8 years ago

Those adverbs! Seriously, I only get them right by accident when speaking English (I am German). Thanks for this awesome explanation. It sparked up my day.

8 years ago

Thanks, geeky post,

but man.. typo city.

8 years ago
Reply to  Emanuel

Please what does it mean NOPE ? You use it frequently? Is somthing like Nee or Na or Nëu or simply NEIN ???

8 years ago
Reply to  Emanuel

Vielen danke .